skip to main content
10.1145/3551504.3551558acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesceeegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Latin American eGovernance and data protection: the EU model

Published:25 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

eGovernment potential benefits and challenges are similar for Latin America and the European Union, although they have different levels of development. In seeking to advance in the development and application of eGovernment, Latin America has followed, as in other areas of law, the example of the European Union of cooperating among the countries of the region, agreeing on a common agenda for the development of digitization covering the provision of government services, government portals, and privacy protection. However, it can be concluded that while Latin America is focusing on expanding Internet coverage and deploying digital infrastructure, the European Union is at a point of technological development that allows it to focus its efforts on issues such as privacy protection. In the area of privacy protection, Latin America has cases of state espionage and cyber criminality coming from guerrilla groups and drug trafficking gangs that affect citizen's trust in the mechanisms used by eGovernment. This paper proposes Latin America to improve security based on its own social and economic context.

References

  1. Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações. 2022. Plano Nacional de Banda Larga. https://​www.gov.br​/​anatel/​pt-br/​regulado/​universalizacao/​plano-nacional-de-banda-larga. Accessed 30 March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2020. Agenda Digital para América Latina y el Caribe (eLAC2022). Séptima Conferencia Ministerial sobre la Sociedad de la Información de América.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baladron, M. 2019. El Plan Argentina Conectada: una política de Estado desde la infraestructura de comunicaciones. 1 2, 2, 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Berrío-Zapata, C. 2020. The Digital Divide: Observations from the South About a Failed Dialog with the North. In Digital Inequalities in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 289–318. DOI=10.1007/978-3-030-32706-4_14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. BOSMAN, I. 2022. COVID-19 and E-Governance. Lessons from South Africa. South African Institute of International Affairs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brendan van Alsenoy, Els Kindt, and Jos Dumortier. 2011. Privacy and Data Protection Aspects of e-Government Identity Management. In Innovating Government, 251–282. DOI=10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Electrónico. 2007. Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. CEPAL. Agenda Digital para América Latina y el Caribe (eLAC2022). Séptima Conferencia Ministerial sobre la Sociedad, 20-00903. Accessed 10 March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CLAD. 2016. Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Abierto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 2004. Decision 2004/387/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on the interoperable delivery of pan-European eGovernment services to public administrations, businesses and citizens (IDABC). Official Journal L 144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dehousse, F. and van Hecke, K. 2006. The European Union and eGovernment. Studia Diplomatica 59, 3, 135–155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ECLAC, United Nations, and EuropeAid Co-operation office. White Book of eGovernment Interoperability for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Entel; Subsecretaría de Telecomunicaciones del Gobierno de Chile, Ericsson. 2014. Todo Chile Comunicado.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. 1015. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. COM(2015)192 final. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission. 2001. eEurope 2002. Impact and priorities. A communication to the spring European Council in Stockholm, 23-24 March 2001. COM (2001) 140 final. European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission. 2002. eEurope 2005. An information society for all. An Action Plan to be presented in view of the Sevilla European Council, 21/22 June 2002 COM(2002) 263 final. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission. 2003. The Role of eGovernment for Europe's Future. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2003) 567 final. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission. 2016. EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020. Accelerating the digital transformation of government. COM(2016) 179 final. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission. 2018. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions. Towards a common European data space. COM(2018)238. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions. A European strategy for data. COM(2020)66. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. European Commission. 2020. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European data governance (Data Governance Act). A European strategy for data. COM(2020)767 final. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. European Commission. 2021. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity. COM(2021)281 final. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission. 2022. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act). COM(22) 68 final. European Commission, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. European Council. European Council meeting (1-2 October 2020) - Conclusion EUCO 13/20, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. European Council. European Council meeting (21-22 October 2021) - Conclusion EUCO 17/21, 2021, p. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 2011. iGovernment. Amsterdam University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Ignacio Criado. 2009. E-government in latin america.: An approach from an intergovernmental perspective. Estado, gobierno, gestión pública: Revista Chilena de Administración Pública, 14, 9–35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Park, H. W., Swar, B., and Rho, J. J. 2011. A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: a scientometrics approach. Scientometrics 87, 2, 267–286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Magis. 2022. La agenda digital en México - Magis. https://​magis.iteso.mx​/​nota/​la-agenda-digital-en-mexico/​. Accessed 30 March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones de Colombia. 2019. El Plan Vive Digital. https://​mintic.gov.co​/​portal/​vivedigital/​612/​w3-propertyvalue-6106.html. Accessed 30 March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones de Colombia. 2019. El Plan Vive Digital 2014-2018. https://​mintic.gov.co​/​portal/​vivedigital/​612/​w3-article-19654.html. Accessed 30 March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones de Colombia. 2021. Plan TIC 2018-2022. https://​mintic.gov.co​/​micrositios/​plan_tic_2018_2022/​777/​w3-channel.html. Accessed 30 March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Molano Vega, D. Colombia's Digital Agenda: Successes and the Challenges Ahead. In The Global Information Technology Report 2013. Growth and Jobs in a Hyperconnected World, 111–117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Prins, C., Broeders, D., Griffioen, H., Keizer, A.-G., and Keymolen, E. 2011. RECOMMENDATIONS. WORKING ON iGOVERNMENT. In iGovernment. Amsterdam University Press, 197–222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 2020-2020. Séptima Conferencia Ministerial sobre la Sociedad de la Información de América Latina y el Caribe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. United Nations. 2020. Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. Economic & social affairs 2020. United Nations, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. 2020. Peace, justice and strong institutions - United Nations Sustainable Development. https://​www.un.org​/​sustainabledevelopment/​peace-justice/​. Accessed 30 March 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. van Alsenoy, B., Kindt, E., and Dumortier, J. 2011. Privacy and Data Protection Aspects of e-Government Identity Management. In Innovating Government: Normative, Policy and Technological Dimensions of Modern Government, S. van der Hof and M. M. Groothuis, Eds. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands, 251–282. DOI=10.1007/978-90-6704-731-9_15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yuehua Wu. 2014. Protecting personal data in E-government: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly 31, 1, 150–159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Latin American eGovernance and data protection: the EU model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CEEeGov '22: Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days
      September 2022
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781450397667
      DOI:10.1145/3551504

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format