skip to main content
10.1145/3551624.3555304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaamoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Attrition of Workers with Minoritized Identities on AI Teams

Published:17 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The effects of AI systems are far-reaching and affect diverse communities all over the world. The demographics of AI teams, however, do not reflect this diversity. Instead, these teams, particularly at big tech companies, are dominated by Western, White, and male workers. Strategies for preventing harms done by AI must also include making these teams more representative of the diverse communities that these technologies affect. The pipeline of students from K-12 and university level contributes to this - those with minoritized identities are underrepresented or excluded from pursuing computer science careers. However there has been relatively little attention given to how the culture at tech companies, let alone AI teams, contribute to attrition of minoritized people in the workplace. The current study uses semi-structured interviews with minoritized workers on AI teams, managers of AI teams, and leaders working on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the tech field (N = 43), to investigate the reasons why these workers leave these AI teams. The themes from these interviews describe how the culture and climate of these teams may contribute to attrition of minoritized workers, and strategies for making these teams more inclusive and representative of the diverse communities affected by technologies developed by these AI teams. Specifically, the current study found that AI teams in which minoritized workers thrive tend to foster a strong sense of interdisciplinary collaboration, support professional career development, and are run by diverse leaders who understand the importance of undoing the traditional White, Eurocentric, and male workplace norms. These go beyond the “quick fixes” that are prevalent in DEI practices.

References

  1. Adobe. (2021). Adobe Diversity By the Numbers. Adobe. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://www.adobe.com/diversity/data.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amazon Staff. (2020). Our workforce data. US About Amazon. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/workplace/our-workforce-data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashcraft, C., McLain, B., & Eger, E. (2017). Women in Tech: The facts [Ebook]. National Center for Women in Tech. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://wpassets.ncwit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/13193304/ncwit_women-in-it_2016full-report_final-web06012016.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018, January). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency (pp. 77-91). PMLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2020). The whiteness of AI. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 685-703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chung-Yan, G. A. (2010). The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being. Journal of occupational health psychology, 15(3), 237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Code.org. (2021). Code.org's Approach to Diversity & Equity in Computer Science. Code.org. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://code.org/diversity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan. L. Rev., 43, 1241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Danaher, K., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Maintaining the system with tokenism: Bolstering individual mobility beliefs and identification with a discriminatory organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 343-362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. EhtİYar, R., & Ersoy, A. (2018). Job Embeddedness: A Ten Year Literature Review. Social Sciences Researches in the Globalizing World, 657Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Facebook. (2021). Facebook Diversity Update: Increasing Representation in Our Workforce and Supporting MinorityOwned Businesses | Meta. Meta. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://about.fb.com/news/2021/07/facebook-diversityreport-2021/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldstein, S., (2021). The Global Expansion of AI Surveillance. [online] Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: <https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/09/17/global-expansion-of-ai-surveillance-pub-79847>[Accessed 17 September 2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Foldy, E. G. (2019, July). Employee Resource Groups: What We Know about Their Impact on Individuals andGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Organizations. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 10633). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of ManagementGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Firth, N. (2021). Apple Card is being investigated over claims it gives women lower credit limits. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 23 November 2021, from https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/11/11/131983/apple-card-is-being-investigatedover-claims-it-gives-women-lower-credit-limits/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Google (2021).2021 Diversity Annual Report. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/diversity.google/en//annualreport/static/pdfs/google_2021_diversity_annual_report.pdf?cachebust=2e13d07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunaratnam, Y. (2003). Researching 'race' and ethnicity: Methods, knowledge and power. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Heater, B. (2020). Tech companies respond to George Floyd's death, ensuing protests and systemic racism. Techcrunch.com. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://techcrunch.com/2020/06/01/tech-co-protests/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill, C. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological AssociationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Karimi-Haghighi, M., & Castillo, C. (2021, June). Enhancing a recidivism prediction tool with machine learning: effectiveness and algorithmic fairness. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 210-214)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, J. Y., & Roberson, L. (2021). I'm biased and so are you. What should organizations do? A review of organizational implicit-bias training programs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Margetts, T., & Holland, E. (2017). The Case for Group Heterogeneity. In Discrimination and Diversity: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1852-1871). IGI GlobalGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Martinez, E., & Kirchner, L. (2021). The secret bias hidden in mortgage-approval algorithms | AP News. AP News. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://apnews.com/article/lifestyle-technology-business-race-and-ethnicity-mortgages2d3d40d5751f933a88c1e17063657586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. McMahon, B. T., Roessler, R., Rumrill, P. D., Hurley, J. E., West, S. L., Chan, F., & Carlson, L. (2008). Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA: Characteristics of charging parties. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(2), 122-132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ng, T. W., Yam, K. C., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 72(1), 107-137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Rooney, K., & Khorram, Y. (2020). Tech companies say they value diversity, but reports show little change in last six years. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/12/six-years-into-diversity-reports-big-tech-has-made-little-progress.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sanz, E. (2014). Exploring Stereotype Threat in the Workplace with Sexual MinoritiesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sears, B., & Mallory, C. (2011). Documented evidence of employment discrimination & its effects on LGBT people.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott, A., Kapor Klein, F., & Onovakpuri, U. (2017). Tech Leavers Study [Ebook]. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://www.kaporcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/TechLeavers2017.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Stanford HAI. (2021). The AI Index Report: Measuring Trends in Artificial intelligence [Ebook]. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-AI-Index-Report-_Chapter-6.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tomasev, N., McKee, K.R., Kay, J., & Mohamed, S. (2021). Fairness for Unobserved Characteristics: Insights from technological impacts on queer communities. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wang, J., Cheng, G. H. L., Chen, T., & Leung, K. (2019). Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6), 693-708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Women in the Workplace 2021. (2021). Retrieved 23 November 2021, from https://www.mckinsey.com/featuredinsights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Young, E., Wajcman, J. and Sprejer, L. (2021). Where are the Women? Mapping the Gender Job Gap in AI. Policy Briefing: Full Report. The Alan Turing Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Zweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2021). 2020 Taulbee Survey: Bachelor's and Doctoral Degree Production Growth Continues but New Student Enrollment Shows Declines [Ebook]. Computing Research Association. Retrieved 24 November 2021, from https://cra.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2020-CRA-Taulbee-Survey.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Attrition of Workers with Minoritized Identities on AI Teams
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        EAAMO '22: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization
        October 2022
        239 pages
        ISBN:9781450394772
        DOI:10.1145/3551624

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Upcoming Conference

        EAAMO '24
        Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization
        October 30 - November 1, 2024
        San Luis Potosi , Mexico
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader