skip to main content
10.1145/3551663.3558684acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cost-effective Measurements of 5G Radio Resources Allocation for Telecom Market Regulator's Monitoring

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Regulatory Authority monitors and regulates the telecom market at a national-wide range. One of its main tasks is to put spectrum at disposal of the Mobile Network Operators (MNO) for serving the increase number of users and services. For this scope, the Regulator needs to have an independent estimation of the usage of the radio resources by the operators, so that it may anticipate future needs and to initiate actions (e.g., liberation of frequency bands) directed to fulfill the demands of the market. This paper presents a methodology for Regulator-triggered monitoring of 5G radio resources allocation. The requirements of the methodology are: (1) monitoring measurements must be external to the network, (2) information from the MNO is limited to the data of the radio infrastructure, such as localization and technical data of the antennas, and (3) any measurements need to be cost-effective since it is supposed that the Regulator will make extended test campaigns through the whole national territory. Our results of 5G measurements validate the methodology and show the limitations of the estimation of radio resource allocation.

References

  1. A. Narayanan et al., "A Comparative Measurement Study of Commercial 5G mmWave Deployments," IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 2022, pp. 800--809, doi: 10.1109/INFOCOM48880.2022.9796693Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. ETSI TS 138 214, ''Physical layer procedures for data', Release 17. May 2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ETSI TS 123 502, Procedures for the 5G System, Release 15, June 2018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Gupta and R. K. Jha, "A Survey of 5G Network: Architecture and Emerging Technologies," in IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 1206--1232, 2015, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2461602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. ETSI TS 138 314, 5G NR Layer 2 Measurements, Release 16, July 2020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. -X. Wang, J. Bian, J. Sun, W. Zhang and M. Zhang, "A Survey of 5G Channel Measurements and Models," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4) 3142--3168, 2018, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2862141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Kim et al., "Full dimension mimo (FD-MIMO): the next evolution of MIMO in LTE systems," in IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 26--33, April 2014, doi: 10.1109/MWC.2014.6812288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. T. Lu, Z. Fan, Y. Lei, Y. Shang and C. Wang, "The Edge Computing Cloud Architecture Based on 5G Network for Industrial Vision Detection," 2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA), 2021, pp. 328--332, doi: 10.1109/ICBDA51983.2021.9402999Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Tikhomirov, E. Omelyanchuk and A. Semenova, "Recommended 5G frequency bands evaluation," 2018 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications, 2018, pp. 1--5, doi: 10.1109/SOSG.2018.8350639Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tahir, MN, Katz, M. Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11p, LTE and 5G in connected vehicles for cooperative awareness. Engineering Reports. 2022; 4( 4):e12467. doi:10.1002/eng2.12467Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Morton, Active and Passive Metrics and Methods, RFC7799, 2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunhao Zhong and Azzedine Boukerche. 2019. Traffic Signal Control Using Deep Reinforcement Learning with Multiple Resources of Rewards. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks (PE-WASUN '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 23--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345860.3361522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Mongay Batalla, M. Moshin, C. X. Mavromoustakis, K. Wesolowski, G. Mastorakis and K. Krzykowska-Piotrowska, On deploying the Internet of Energy with 5G Open RAN technology including beamforming mechanism, Energies 2022, 15, 2429. DOI: 10.3390/en15072429Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Mongay Batalla, On analyzing video transmission over wireless WiFi and 5G C-band in harsh IIoT environments. IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 118534--118541, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005641Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Xu, Dongzhu et al., Understanding Operational 5G: A First Measurement Study on Its Coverage, Performance and Energy Consumption, SIGCOMM '20, Virtual Event, USA, 2020. DOI: 10.1145/3387514.3405882Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marcelo S. Alencar. 2020. Epidemic Interference in a Cellular System. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks (PE-WASUN '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81--84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3416011.3424748Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. ETSI TS 128 533, 5G, Management and orchestration, Architecture framework, Release 15, Oct. 2018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Mongay Batalla, Advanced Multimedia Service Provisioning based on efficient interoperability of adaptive streaming protocol and High Efficient Video Coding. Springer Journal of Real-Time Image Processing. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11554-015-0496--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tito Raúl Vargas, Juan Carlos Guerri, and Pau Arce. 2021. Study on the Impact of DASH Streaming Services using Energy Efficient Ethernet. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks (PE-WASUN '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89--94. DOI: 10.1145/3479240.3488527Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Mongay Batalla, E. Andrukiewicz, G. Peinado Gomez, P. Sapiecha, C. X. Mavromoustakis, G. Mastorakis, J. Zurek, M. Imran, Security Risk Assessment for 5G networks - national perspective. IEEE Wireless communications, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 16--22, Aug. 2020. DOI: 10.1109/MWC.001.1900524Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cost-effective Measurements of 5G Radio Resources Allocation for Telecom Market Regulator's Monitoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PE-WASUN '22: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor, & Ubiquitous Networks
      October 2022
      148 pages
      ISBN:9781450394833
      DOI:10.1145/3551663

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PE-WASUN '22 Paper Acceptance Rate17of60submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate70of240submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader