ABSTRACT
In higher education institutions, teamwork has become an indispensable requirement and is becoming increasingly important for the effectiveness of courses. Teamwork skills were mentioned as a training goal which must be achieved after graduation by the students. Employers also express that they often have a favorable view of candidates possessing good teamwork skills. However, understanding the importance of teamwork does not mean it will get enough care for development. The current 4.0 technology era has gradually changed the way higher education develop in a new direction. Typically, the involvement of information technology in higher education and the emergence of online courses is becoming more common. Teamwork, which was considered limited at Vietnam's public universities, today seems to face a number of other challenges. The author's research focuses on the issue of teamwork in online courses at Vietnamese public universities.
- Dede, C. 2010. “Comparing Frameworks for 21st Century Skills.” In 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn, edited by James Bellanca and Ron Brandt, 51–76. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
- Hart Research Associates. 2010. “Raising the Bar: Employers’ View on College Learning in the Wake of the Economic Downturn.” Association of American Colleges and Universities. Accessed June 15, 2015Google Scholar
- Riebe, L., D. Roepen, B. Santarelli, and G. Marchioro. 2010. “Teamwork: Effectively Teaching an Employability Skill.” Education + Training 52 (6/7): 528–539Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hughes, R. L., and S. K. Jones. 2011. “Developing and Assessing College Student Teamwork Skills.” New Directions for Institutional Research 2011 (149): 53–64Google ScholarCross Ref
- West, M. A. (2004). Effective teamwork, practical lessons from organizational research. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Editorial Board. (Nov. 2008). Why our education is falling behind; lazy students. Minnesota Daily. Retrieved on June 12, 2009Google Scholar
- Baker, S., Comer, D., & Martinak, M. (2008). All I'm askin' is for a little respect: How can we promote civility in our classrooms? Organization Management Journal, 5(2): 65-80.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 222-226Google Scholar
- Chinowsky, P. S., & Rojas, E. M. (2003). Virtual teams: Guide to successful implementation. Journal of Management in Engineering,19,98-106.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DeRosa, D., & Lepsinger, R. (2010). Virtual team success: A practical guide for working and leading from a distance. San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
- Burke, A. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11 (2), 87-95Google Scholar
- Goold, A., Craig, A., Coldwell, J., Goold, A., Craig, A. & Coldwell, J. (2008). The student experience of working in teams online. In Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2008 (pp. 343-352). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.Google Scholar
- Bonk, C. J., Lee, S. H., Liu, X., & Su, B. (2007). Awareness design in online collaborative learning: A pedagogical perspective. In F. M. M. Neto & F. V. Brasileiro (Eds.), Advances in computer-supported learning (pp. 251–273). Hershey, PA: Information Science PublishingGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams: People working across boundaries with technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
- Graham, C. R. (2002). Factors effective learning groups in face-to-face and virtual environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(3)Google Scholar
- Dede, C. (2005). Planning for Neomillennial Learning Styles. Educause Quarterly, 28 (1), 714Google Scholar
- Anh. Lan Ngo, Duc Minh Hoang. (2020). Online training in universities in Vietnam today: Situation and solutions to improve quality. Journal of Industry and Trade - Results of scientific research and technology application, No. 23, September 2020Google Scholar
- Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 355–395). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Dempsey, J. V., & Van Eck, R. N. (2002). Instructional design online: Evolving expectations. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 281– 294). Merrill Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
- Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
- Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3)Google Scholar
- Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2018). Technology matters – The impact of transactional distance on satisfaction in online distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3)Google Scholar
- Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306Google ScholarCross Ref
- Littlefield, J. (2018). The difference between synchronous and asynchronous distance learning.Google Scholar
- Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 8(III)Google ScholarCross Ref
- Murphy, M. P. A. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 1-14Google Scholar
- John Demuyakor. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Online Learning in Higher Institutions of Education: A Survey of the Perceptions of Ghanaian International Students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 2020, 10(3), e202018Google Scholar
- Procter S. & Currie G. (2004) Target-based teamworking: groups, work and interdependence in the UK civil service. Human Relations 57(12), 1547–1572Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salas E., Sims D.E. & Burke C.S. (2005) Is there a ‘big five’ in teamwork? Small Group Research 36(5), 555–599Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heywood J.S. & Jirjahn U. (2004) Teams, teamwork and absence. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106(4), 765–782Google ScholarCross Ref
- Borrill C., West M., Shapiro D. & Rees A. (2000) Team working and effectiveness in health care. British Journal of Health Care Management 6(8), 364–37Google Scholar
- Kozlowski, S., and Ilgen, D. R. “Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.” Psychological Science, 2006, 7, 77–12Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morgeson, F. P., Lindoerfer, D., and Loring, D. J. “Developing Team Leadership Capability.” In E. Van Velsor, C. McCauley, and M. Ruderman (eds.), The Center for Creative Leadership Handbook of Leadership Development (3rd ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010Google Scholar
- Sewell G. (2005) Doing what comes naturally? Why we need a practical ethics of teamwork. International Journal of Human Resource Management 16(2), 202–218Google ScholarCross Ref
- Levin P. (2005) Successful Teamwork. Open University Press, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
- Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A conceptual framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356 –376Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ingram, H. (2000). Linking teamwork with performance. Journal of Team Performance Management, 2(4), 5-10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parks, C. & Sanna, L. (1999). Group performance and interaction. Boulder, CO: Westview.Robyn, E. (2000). Creating tribes. College Teaching, 48(2), 65-68.Google Scholar
- Levi, D. (2007). Group dynamics for teams. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69-95Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & BaconGoogle Scholar
- He, J., & Glenda, G. (2015). Examining factors that affect students’ knowledge sharing within virtual teams. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(2), 169–187Google Scholar
- Woerner, S. L., Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (2004). The media toolbox: Combining media in organizational communication.Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Mason, R. (1998). Globalising education: Trends and applications. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Driver, M. (2002). Exploring student perceptions of group interaction and class satisfaction in the web-enhanced classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 5(1), 35–45Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A Study on Teamwork in Online Courses at Vietnamese Public Universities
Recommendations
A Study on the Use of Electronic Library at Vietnamese Public Universities
ICDTE '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in EducationThe strong explosion of science and technology around the world has created conditions for information technology to be applied in many fields. The 21st century is known for the 4.0 technology revolution when digital becomes ubiquitous and virtual ...
Are You an Online Team Player?: A Pilot Study
The purpose of this pilot case study was to answer the following research questions: How do previous experiences affect students' attitudes toward online teamwork? When do students' attitudes toward online teamwork first develop and why? Using a social ...
Teamwork Online: Learning From the Experience
SIGITE '19: Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology EducationThe ability to work in teams is critical in IT. While traditional teamwork might include the expectation of face-to-face meetings, online interactions reflect the distributed environment that is becoming more common in the workplace. This paper will ...
Comments