skip to main content
10.1145/3551708.3551782acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Revitalizing Introductory Computer Courses for Non-CS Majors: A Comparative Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to better expand the academic horizons of non-Computer Science (CS) majors, the universities across Macao usually offer introductory courses on computer science and computer applications. There are often problems when these students enter an introductory computer course on conceptual learning (CL), because of lack of different experience levels with science topics. This paper aims to present and summarize a variety of performances on CL for non-CS majors at the Macao Polytechnic University (MPU), majoring in such disciplines as Social Work (SW), Public Administration (PA), Chinese-Portuguese/English Translation and Interpretation (CPETI), Science in Nursing (SN), particularly associated to CL. The paper also includes the descriptions and results of work done at the MPU. We have collected the assessment information of each class (continuous assessment and final examinations), more than 2,000 non-CS majors over the past 16 years at MPU. Based our statistics, for a high percentage of these students, they will feel certain difficulty of CL, but the degree of difficulties, the students from studies reflect the different characteristics, Through the questionaries and classroom conversations, the possible reasons and problem solutions are discussed in the end of this paper..

References

  1. MPU Student Engagement Survey (for BSc in Computing): from 2009-2010 till 2021-2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. MPU Student Engagement Survey (for MSc in Big Data and IoT): from 2019-20 till 2021-22Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. MPU Graduate Employment Survey (for BSc in Computing): from 2004-2005 till 2020-2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ngai Cheong (2022) “Personalized Learning in Science Recommendation System Based on Learners’ Preferences”, The proceedings of 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies (ICEDS 2022), pp.22-27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ngai Cheong (2021) “Knowledge-based Recommender System of Conceptual Learning in Science”,The The proceedings of 2021 5th International Conference on Education and E-Learning (ICEEL 2021), pp.9-15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jeannette M.Wing (2006), Computational thinking. Commun. ACM;49(3):pp. 33-35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniel D.Garcia, Collcen M. Lewis, John P.Dougherty, and Matthew C.Jadud (2010) “If you might be a computational thinker!”, In Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGCSE. ACM, New York, USA, pp.263-264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis Kafura and Deborah Tatar (2010) “ Initial experience with a computational thinking course for computer science students” In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGCSE. ACM,New York,USA, pp.251-256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Paul Curzon, Computing Without Computers: A Gentle Introduction to Computer Programming, Data Structures and Algorithms. http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/pc/research/education/puzzles/reading/;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. C. Bart, R. Whitcomb, D. Kafura, C. A. Shaffer and E. Tilevich (2017) "Computing with corgis: Diverse real-world datasets for introductory computing", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 57-62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Han, Z. Li, J. S. He and X. S. Tian (2019) "Understand the emerging demands of computing education for non-cs major students", Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 1266-1266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. McKinsey , (2011), Big data: the next frontier for innovation competition and productivity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Y. Lye and J. H. L. Koh (2014) "Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for k-12", Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 41, pp. 51-61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Hoenig, R. Pollak, B. Schulz and V. Stocke (2016) "Social capital participation in adult education and labor market success: Constructing a new instrument", Methodological issues of longitudinal surveys, pp. 291-312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. K. Antonis, T. Daradoumis, S. Papadakis and C. Simos (2010) "Evaluation of the effectiveness of a web-based learning design for adult computer science courses", IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 374-380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Weintrop, E. Beheshti, M. Horn, K. Orton, K. Jona, L. Trouille, (2016) "Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms", Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127-147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. Rich, C. Strickland and D. Franklin (2017) "A literature review through the lens of computer science learning goals theorized and explored in research", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 495-500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. VanDeGrift (2017) "Pogil activities in data structures: What do students value", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 597-602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. Medel and V. Pournaghshband (2017) "Eliminating gender bias in computer science education materials", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 411-416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sohail Alhazmi, Margaret Hamilton, and Charles Thevathayan (2018) “CS for All: Catering to Diversity of Master's Students Through Assignment Choices”, In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp.38-43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Katherine G. Herbert-Berger, Nina Goodey, Stephen Ruczszyk, Scott Kight, and Thomas J. Marlowe (2019) “Infusing CS Graduate Transition Curriculum with Professional, Technical and Data Science Competencies”, In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp.1266-1275Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Revitalizing Introductory Computer Courses for Non-CS Majors: A Comparative Study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICEMT '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
          July 2022
          482 pages
          ISBN:9781450396455
          DOI:10.1145/3551708

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 November 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format