Sihong Lin
ABSTRACT
With the widespread application of online learning platforms in universities, the functional section of the online discussion area has gradually become a virtual place for expressing communication, collaborative sharing, presentation, reporting and debate evaluation. Interactive discussion is an important means of forming knowledge construction. However, it is difficult for the existing system framework to reflect the systematic nature of online collaborative discussion. Therefore, this study aims to reconstruct the interaction quality evaluation framework of collaborative knowledge construction, and use the Delphi method to revise the framework to help teachers better conduct design and analysis of collaborative discussions. Finally, combined with the framework, the text discussion posts are automatically classified to verify the feasibility of automatic evaluation under the new coding system.
- He Ji, Yanfei Zhu. Inheritance and Innovation: From Community to Learning Community [J]. China Distance Education, 2019(10):74-79.DOI:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2019.10.007.Google Scholar
- Yanru Wu. Empirical research on blended learning to promote the development of college students' critical thinking ability[J].Electronic Education Research,2014,35(08):83-88.DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2014.08.013.Google Scholar
- Decuyper S, Dochy F, Van den Bossche P. Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations[J]. Educational Research Review, 2010, 5(2): 111-133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qingtang Liu, Liming He and Linjing. Educational Text Mining Model and Application in the Age of Intelligence [J]. Modern Distance Education Research, 2020,32(05):95-103.Google Scholar
- Zhiqiang Ma, Wenxin Guo and Wang Meng. Intelligent Mining Analysis of Conversation Content for Collaborative Knowledge Construction [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2022(01):3-13.Google Scholar
- Garrison D R, Anderson T, Archer W. The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective[J]. The internet and higher education, 2010, 13(1-2): 5-9.Google Scholar
- Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis[M]//Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992: 117-136.Google Scholar
- Gunawardena C N, Lowe C A, Anderson T. Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 1997, 17(4): 397-431.Google Scholar
- Chi M T H, Wylie R. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes[J]. Educational psychologist, 2014, 49(4): 219-243.Google Scholar
- Anderson L W, Krathwohl D R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives[M]. Longman,, 2001.Google Scholar
- Veerman A L, Andriessen J E B, Kanselaar G. Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation[J]. 1999.Google Scholar
- Nandi D, Hamilton M, Chang S, Evaluating quality in online asynchronous interactions between students and discussion facilitators[J]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2012, 28(4).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dongmei Zhang, Lu Wang. Research on the Influence of Cognitive Conflict Management on the Quality of Cooperative Learning [J]. China Electronic Education, 2021(09):131-136.Google Scholar
- Cendros Araujo R, Gadanidis G. Online collaborative mind mapping in a mathematics teacher education program: a study on student interaction and knowledge construction[J]. ZDM, 2020, 52(5): 943-958.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McKenzie W, Murphy D. " I hope this goes somewhere": Evaluation of an online discussion group[J]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2000, 16(3).Google Scholar
- Jiping Jiang, Jinyan Hu, and Yibing Zhang. Research on the Development Track of "Perspective Improvement" in Knowledge Construction Learning Community [J]. Electronic Education Research, 2019,40(02):21-29.DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.02. 003.Google Scholar
- Marshal, Huan Huang, Tingting He, and Wei Huang. Evaluation of College Teachers' Network Teaching Investment Based on Teaching Behavior Analysis: Taking Z University in Hubei Province as an Example [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2021,31(03):57-63.Google Scholar
- Pena-Shaff J B, Nicholls C. Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions[J]. Computers & Education, 2004, 42(3): 243-265.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yibing Zhang. Knowledge Construction: Transformation of Teaching and Learning from the Perspective of New Education Equity [M]. Nanjing Normal University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
- Liying Wang, Yibing Zhang. Quality Evaluation of Viewpoints Integrating Knowledge Construction and Machine Learning[J].Modern Educational Technology,2020,30(11):62-69.Google Scholar
- Tiansheng Cao, Fanshi Kong, Ke Zhu, and Yanmin Li. Research on grouping strategies to promote the depth of interaction between learners[J].Modern Educational Technology,2020,30(06):55-60.Google Scholar
- Yunzhen Liang. Research on learner interaction evaluation in online learning space[J].Modern Educational Technology,2018,28(11):73-79.Google Scholar
- Ling Chen, Chongyang Yang, and Shengquan Yu. Research on the internal mechanism of high-quality dialogue between teachers and students in online tutoring [J]. Distance Education Journal, 2021,39(05):76-86.DOI:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304 /g4.2021.05.008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yanyan Li, Yu Peng, Jia Kang, Haogang Bao, and You Su. Analysis Model Construction and Application of Group Learning Engagement in Online Collaborative Learning [J]. China Distance Education, 2020(02):40-48+77.Google Scholar
- Xuejiao Huang, Dongdai Zhou, and Fengjuan Liu. Research on the developmental trajectory of learners' critical thinking in online interactive activities[J].Modern Distance Education, 2021(01):24-31.Google Scholar
- Xinlai Dai, Congcong Liu. Research on Deep Interaction of Virtual Learning Community Based on Learning Analysis [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2019(05):51-58.Google Scholar
- Yaqian Xu, Li Chen. Research on the Relationship between Individual Network Status and Conceptual Network Characteristics in Connectivism Learning——Based on the Analysis of Partial Interactive Content of cMOOC Phase 1 Course[J]. China Distance Education, 2019(10):9-19+51 +92.Google Scholar
- Pingxia Zhang, Jia Lv. Research on Learning Evaluation of MOOC Discussion Area Based on Text Mining [D]. Chongqing Normal University, 2018.Google Scholar
- Yassine, Benjelloun & Hadioui, Abdelladim & El Faddouli, Nour-eddine & Bennani, Samir. (2020). Machine learning for Knowledge construction in a MOOC Discussion Forum. 9. 2933-2942.Google Scholar
- Shimojo S, Hayashi Y. Prompting learner-learner collaborative learning for deeper interaction: conversational analysis based on the ICAP framework[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. 2020: 177-182.Google Scholar
- Junling Liu, Wenlan Zhang, Bin Liu. Design and Application of Online Collaborative Interactive Text Coding System: A Research Based on Emotional Interaction Perspective [J]. Research in Electronic Education, 2020,41(06):53-59.DOI:10.13811/j. cnki.eer.2020.06.008.Google Scholar
- MacKinnon G R. The dilemma of evaluating electronic discussion groups[J]. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 2000, 33(2): 125-131.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee S J C, Abdul Rabu S N. Google docs for higher education: Evaluating online interaction and reflective writing using content analysis approach[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2021: 1-31.Google Scholar
- Nami F, Marandi S S, Sotoudehnama E. Interaction in a discussion list: An exploration of cognitive, social, and teaching presence in teachers’ online collaborations[J]. ReCALL, 2018, 30(3): 375-398.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ling Yang, Shukun Tang, and Peixiao Qi. Research on evaluation indicators of popular science service in Chinese universities based on grounded theory [J]. Popular Science Research, 2021,16(05):76-84+103.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Research on Online Interaction Quality Evaluation of Collaborative Knowledge Construction
Recommendations
Effects of an individual's prior knowledge on collaborative knowledge construction and individual learning outcomes in videoconferencing
CSCL '05: Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!This paper deals with collaborative knowledge construction in videoconferencing. The main topic for investigation is how to predict individual learning outcomes, and in particular the degree to which an individual's prior knowledge and collaborative ...
Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in desktop video-conferencing: effects of content schemes and cooperation scripts in peer teaching settings
CSCL '02: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL CommunityVideo-conferencing is expected to become increasingly important for tele-learning environments. In contrast to asynchronous, text-based computer-mediated communication, video-conferencing facilitates cooperation tasks that require highly frequent and ...
Research on the Construction of online Course Quality Evaluation System in Universities
ICISCAE 2021: 2021 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided EducationBased on the investigation and analysis of the current situation of online course construction, and in the light of the problems existing in online course quality, from the five dimensions of course construction, course organization, course examination, ...
Comments