skip to main content
10.1145/3554364.3559109acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extending the ontology, metacommunication and communicability of semiotic engineering to the emerging paradigm of human-computer integration (HInt)

Published:19 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human-Computer Integration (HInt) is an emerging paradigm in the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) area, which characterizes the relationship between humans and technologies as a partnership. This paradigm offers new challenges for the HCI area, including demands for reviewing and proposing theories and methods to consolidate and evolve HInt within HCI. Thus, this paper presents an analysis of the applicability and a proposal for extending the Semiotic Engineering ontology and concepts to characterize HInt. As contributions, our results are useful to: (1) advance in the consolidation and evolution of HInt as a new HCI paradigm; and (2) stimulate other initiatives and contributions grounded in Semiotic Engineering for HCI with a lens on HInt.

References

  1. Mohammed Alharbi and Shihong Huang. 2020. A Survey of Incorporating Affective Computing for Human-System Co-Adaptation. In Proceedings of the 2020 The 2nd World Symposium on Software Engineering (Chengdu, China) (WSSE 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Josh Andres, m.c. schraefel, Nathan Semertzidis, Brahmi Dwivedi, Yutika C. Kulwe, Juerg von Kaenel, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2020. Introducing Peripheral Awareness as a Neurological State for Human-Computer Integration. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Glívia A. R. Barbosa, Raquel O. Prates, Ulisses da S. Fernandes, and Natália S. Santos. 2021. Extending Interaction to Human-Computer Integration: What Do We Already Know and What Do We Need to Explore?. In Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Virtual Event, Brazil) (IHC '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 7 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Glívia A. R. Barbosa, Raquel O. Prates, Ulisses da S. Fernandes, and Natália S. Santos. 2022. O presente e o futuro da Integração Humano-Computador como extensão da Interação: Uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura. Technical Report RT.DCC.002/2022. Departamento de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG. 42 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lauren M. Britton and Bryan Semaan. 2017. Manifesting the Cyborg through Techno-Body Modification: From Human-Computer Interaction to Integration. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2499--2510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bruno Azevedo Chagas. 2020. Metacommunication and Appropriation in the Design of the Interactive Internet of Things. Ph.D. Dissertation. PUC-Rio.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruno A. Chagas, David F. Redmiles, and Clarisse S. de Souza. 2018. Observed Appropriation of IoT Technology: A Semiotic Account. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Belém, Brazil) (IHC 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 33, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bruno A Chagas, David F Redmiles, and Clarisse S de Souza. 2019. Signs of Appropriation: A Semiotic Account of Breakdowns with IoT Technology. Journal on Interactive Systems 10, 2 (2019), 3--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bruno Santana da Silva and Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2007. Designing human-computer interaction with MoLIC diagrams-a practical guide. Technical Report 12/07. PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro. 12 pages. ISSN: 0103-9741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 2005. The semiotic engineering of human-computer interaction. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza and Carla Faria Leitão. 2009. Semiotic engineering methods for scientific research in HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 2, 1 (2009), 1--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Andreas Dengel, Laurence Devillers, and Laura Maria Schaal. 2021. Augmented Human and Human-Machine Co-evolution: Efficiency and Ethics. Reflections on Artificial Intelligence for Humanity (2021), 203--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Umer Farooq and Jonathan Grudin. 2016. Human-Computer Integration. Interactions 23, 6 (Oct. 2016), 26--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Verena Fuchsberger. 2019. The Future's Hybrid Nature. Interactions 26, 4 (June 2019), 26--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Miriam Gil, Manoli Albert, Joan Fons, and Vicente Pelechano. 2020. Engineering human-in-the-loop interactions in cyber-physical systems. Information and Software Technology 126 (2020), 106349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jeffrey C. F. Ho. 2018. Computer as Partner: A Critique Perspective of Interaction Design for Social Sustainability. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Chinese CHI (Montreal, QC, Canada) (ChineseCHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sang-won Leigh, Harpreet Sareen, Hsin-Liu (Cindy) Kao, Xin Liu, and Pattie Maes. 2017. Body-Borne Computers as Extensions of Self. Computers 6, 1 (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Zhuying Li, Rakesh Patibanda, Felix Brandmueller, Wei Wang, Kyle Berean, Stefan Greuter, and Florian 'Floyd' Mueller. 2018. The Guts Game: Towards Designing Ingestible Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (CHI PLAY '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 271--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rodrigo de A. Maués and Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2013. Cross-Communicability: Evaluating the Meta-communication of Cross-Platform Applications. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 241--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodrigo de A. Maués and Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa. 2014. Reflections on the Cross-Platform Semiotic Inspection Method. In Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 533--544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Florian Mueller, Pattie Maes, and Jonathan Grudin. 2019. Human-Computer Integration (Dagstuhl Seminar 18322). Dagstuhl Reports 8, 8 (2019), 18--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Florian Floyd Mueller, Pedro Lopes, Paul Strohmeier, Wendy Ju, Caitlyn Seim, Martin Weigel, Suranga Nanayakkara, Marianna Obrist, Zhuying Li, Joseph Delfa, Jun Nishida, Elizabeth M. Gerber, Dag Svanaes, Jonathan Grudin, Stefan Greuter, Kai Kunze, Thomas Erickson, Steven Greenspan, Masahiko Inami, Joe Marshall, Harald Reiterer, Katrin Wolf, Jochen Meyer, Thecla Schiphorst, Dakuo Wang, and Pattie Maes. 2020. Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jasmin Niess and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2020. Embracing Companion Technologies. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (Tallinn, Estonia) (NordiCHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Erica R. Oliveira, Luiz C. S. Luz, and Raquel O. Prates. 2008. Aplicação Semi-Estruturada Do MéTodo de Inspeção SemióTica: Estudo de Caso Para o DomíNio Educacional. In Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil) (IHC '08). Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, BRA, 50--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Charles Sanders Peirce Peirce and Charles Sanders Peirce. 1992. The essential Peirce, volume 1: Selected philosophical writings?(1867--1893). Vol. 1. Indiana University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Raquel Oliveira Prates and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 1998. Towards a semiotic environment for supporting the development of multi-user interfaces.. In CRIWG, Vol. 98. 15pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Raquel O Prates, Clarisse S de Souza, and Simone DJ Barbosa. 2000. Methods and tools: a method for evaluating the communicability of user interfaces. interactions 7, 1 (2000), 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Soraia Reis and Raquel O. Prates. 2011. Applicability of the Semiotic Inspection Method: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco, Brazil) (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, BRA, 177--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Samsung. 2022. Solução Samsung Galaxy Fit2. Retrieved May 27, 2022 from https://www.samsung.com/br/watches/galaxy-fit/galaxy-fit2-black-sm-r220nzkazto/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Chairs Constantine Stephanidis, Gavriel Salvendy, Members of the Group Margherita Antona, Jessie Y. C. Chen, Jianming Dong, Vincent G. Duffy, Xiaowen Fang, Cali Fidopiastis, Gino Fragomeni, Limin Paul Fu, Yinni Guo, Don Harris, Andri Ioannou, Kyeong ah (Kate) Jeong, Shin'ichi Konomi, Heidi Krömker, Masaaki Kurosu, James R. Lewis, Aaron Marcus, Gabriele Meiselwitz, Abbas Moallem, Hirohiko Mori, Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Stavroula Ntoa, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Dylan Schmorrow, Keng Siau, Norbert Streitz, Wentao Wang, Sakae Yamamoto, Panayiotis Zaphiris, and Jia Zhou. 2019. Seven HCI Grand Challenges. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 35, 14 (2019), 1229--1269. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Extending the ontology, metacommunication and communicability of semiotic engineering to the emerging paradigm of human-computer integration (HInt)

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IHC '22: Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        October 2022
        482 pages
        ISBN:9781450395069
        DOI:10.1145/3554364

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader