skip to main content
10.1145/3555051.3555064acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesopencollabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Surveying the Open Science Knowledge in a Southern Brazilian University

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Open Science can be seen as a movement that has been spread out by the scientific community of all areas. In this movement, practices that seek to facilitate the sharing of research artifacts are considered. Possible artifacts include articles, data, scripts, and processes. In this paper, we present and discuss the results of a survey on open science carried out in the context of the State University of Maringá (UEM) in Brazil. Such a survey is aimed at investigating the degree of knowledge about open science from lecturers who supervise Master’s degree students and PhD candidates. The university has currently 54 graduate programs, distributed in different centers, encompassing almost 900 lecturers. We collected data using a web questionnaire with 22 questions. In total, 90 lecturers answered our survey. Results show that a significant subset of respondents never heard about open science, whereas the complementary subset barely dealt with the open science principles, tools or license types. We then provide in this paper a set of assumptions on several open science-related subjects. In addition, this paper might be used to guide any other university to measure the degree level of open science knowledge and to provide a plan to inspire the institutionalization of such an extremely relevant scientific topic.

References

  1. Johan Linåker, Sardar Sulaman, Martin Höst, and Rafael de Mello. 2015. Guidelines for Conducting Surveys in Software Engineering. Technical Report 1.1. Lund University, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Erin C McKiernan, Philip E Bourne, C Titus Brown, Stuart Buck, Amye Kenall, Jennifer Lin, Damon McDougall, Brian A Nosek, Karthik Ram, Courtney K Soderberg, 2016. How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife 5(2016), e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.16800Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Daniel Mendez, Daniel Graziotin, Stefan Wagner, and Heidi Seibold. 2020. Open Science in Software Engineering. In Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering. Springer, 477–501.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carole Paleco, Sabina García Peter, Nora Salas Seoane, Julia Kaufmann, and Panagiota Argyri. 2021. Inclusiveness and Diversity in Citizen Science. Springer International Publishing, 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Open Science Policies. 2020. The future of science is open. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/taxonomy/term/8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniel Schlagwein, Kieran Conboy, Joseph Feller, Jan Marco Leimeister, and Lorraine Morgan. 2017. “Openness” with and without Information Technology: A Framework and a Brief History. Journal of Information Technology 32, 4 (2017), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0049-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. UNESCO. 2019. UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378841Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chris Woolston. 2021. Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions. Nature 595, 462 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Surveying the Open Science Knowledge in a Southern Brazilian University

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          OpenSym '22: Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
          September 2022
          86 pages
          ISBN:9781450398459
          DOI:10.1145/3555051

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 September 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate108of195submissions,55%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format