Surveying the Open Science Knowledge in a Southern Brazilian University
Article No.: 1, Pages 1 - 10
Abstract
Open Science can be seen as a movement that has been spread out by the scientific community of all areas. In this movement, practices that seek to facilitate the sharing of research artifacts are considered. Possible artifacts include articles, data, scripts, and processes. In this paper, we present and discuss the results of a survey on open science carried out in the context of the State University of Maringá (UEM) in Brazil. Such a survey is aimed at investigating the degree of knowledge about open science from lecturers who supervise Master’s degree students and PhD candidates. The university has currently 54 graduate programs, distributed in different centers, encompassing almost 900 lecturers. We collected data using a web questionnaire with 22 questions. In total, 90 lecturers answered our survey. Results show that a significant subset of respondents never heard about open science, whereas the complementary subset barely dealt with the open science principles, tools or license types. We then provide in this paper a set of assumptions on several open science-related subjects. In addition, this paper might be used to guide any other university to measure the degree level of open science knowledge and to provide a plan to inspire the institutionalization of such an extremely relevant scientific topic.
References
[1]
Johan Linåker, Sardar Sulaman, Martin Höst, and Rafael de Mello. 2015. Guidelines for Conducting Surveys in Software Engineering. Technical Report 1.1. Lund University, Sweden.
[2]
Erin C McKiernan, Philip E Bourne, C Titus Brown, Stuart Buck, Amye Kenall, Jennifer Lin, Damon McDougall, Brian A Nosek, Karthik Ram, Courtney K Soderberg, 2016. How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife 5(2016), e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.16800
[3]
Daniel Mendez, Daniel Graziotin, Stefan Wagner, and Heidi Seibold. 2020. Open Science in Software Engineering. In Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering. Springer, 477–501.
[4]
Carole Paleco, Sabina García Peter, Nora Salas Seoane, Julia Kaufmann, and Panagiota Argyri. 2021. Inclusiveness and Diversity in Citizen Science. Springer International Publishing, 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_14
[5]
Open Science Policies. 2020. The future of science is open. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/taxonomy/term/8
[6]
Daniel Schlagwein, Kieran Conboy, Joseph Feller, Jan Marco Leimeister, and Lorraine Morgan. 2017. “Openness” with and without Information Technology: A Framework and a Brief History. Journal of Information Technology 32, 4 (2017), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0049-3
[7]
UNESCO. 2019. UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378841
[8]
Chris Woolston. 2021. Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions. Nature 595, 462 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5
Index Terms
- Surveying the Open Science Knowledge in a Southern Brazilian University
Recommendations
Open Science
DATA 2015: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Data Management Technologies and ApplicationsThe term â open dataâ refers to information that has been made technically and legally available for reuse. In our research, we focus on the particular case of open research data. We conducted a literature review in order to determine what are the ...
Open science – towards reproducible research
APE 2017, Berlin, Germany, January 16-18, 2017This paper presents an overview of several efforts towards reproducible research in the field of medical imaging and visualization. In the first section, the components of Open Science are presented: open access, open data and open source. In the second ...
Open science progress: A literature assessment of open access articles
IC3INA '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its ApplicationsThe open science movement has been widely adopted in multiple scientific fields across nations. Its benefit has been proven in many cases, most notably when the practice accelerated the search for solutions to the Covid-19 pandemic both in medical and ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2022
86 pages
ISBN:9781450398459
DOI:10.1145/3555051
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 14 September 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
OpenSym 2022
OpenSym 2022: The 18th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
September 7 - 9, 2022
Madrid, Spain
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 195 submissions, 55%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 59Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)10
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format