skip to main content
research-article

Designing for Shared Values: Exploring Ethical Dilemmas of Conducting Values Inclusive Design Research

Published:11 November 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recent prevalence of values-inclusive design research introduces the potential of conducting research with those whose values conflict with researchers' own values. This is the scenario we have found ourselves in as we conduct values-inclusive participatory design to develop and deploy critical digital literacy education in a rural Appalachian community. We present provocations which outline the ethical concerns we have grappled with in pursuit of conducting fair and responsible research for our participants, indirect stakeholders, and ourselves. Through consideration of these provocations, we have developed a preliminary approach for managing a research relationship with those with whom we disagree which we call Designing for Shared Values. This approach is a conflict-avoidant method for negotiating values in values-inclusive design. It centers around reflexivity as a mechanism to account for one's own values and potential impacts of design research outcomes on indirect stakeholders, while maintaining responsibility to prioritize beneficial outcomes to research participants.

References

  1. Tamara Alsheikh, Jennifer A. Rode, and Siân E. Lindley. 2011. (Whose) value-sensitive design: a study of long- distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '11. ACM Press, Hangzhou, China, 75. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mariam Asad. 2019. Prefigurative Design as a Method for Research Justice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Seyram Avle and Silvia Lindtner. 2016. Design(ing) 'Here' and 'There': Tech Entrepreneurs, Global Markets, and Reflexivity in Design Processes. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 2233--2245. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kyle Barnes and Janet Vertesi. 2020. Invisiborders: Wearable Politics. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Eindhoven Netherlands, 157--162. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395858Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Allen Batteau. 1979. Appalachia and the Concept of Culture: A Theory of Shared Misunderstandings. Appalachian Journal, Vol. 7, 1/2 (1979), 9--31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40932719 Publisher: Appalachian Journal & Appalachian State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Erling Björgvinsson. 2017. Managing Collaborative Critique in Times of Financialisation Capitalism. (2017). https://gup-server.ub.gu.se/publication/260384Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign, Vol. 8, 2--3 (June 2012), 127--144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672577Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kathleen M. Blee. 2007. Ethnographies of the Far Right. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (April 2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lorraine Boissoneault. 2017. The Coal Mining Massacre America Forgot. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/forgotten-matewan-massacre-was-epicenter-20th-century-mine-wars-180963026/ Section: Articles, History, U.S. History.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pam Briggs and Lisa Thomas. 2015. An Inclusive, Value Sensitive Design Perspective on Future Identity Technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 22, 5 (Sept. 2015), 1--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2778972Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Barry Brown, Alexandra Weilenmann, Donald McMillan, and Airi Lampinen. 2016. Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 852--863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Catherine E. Burnette, Sara Sanders, Howard K. Butcher, and Jacki T. Rand. 2014. A Toolkit for Ethical and Culturally Sensitive Research: An Application with Indigenous Communities. Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 8, 4 (Oct. 2014), 364--382. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.885987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Edward J. Cabbell. 1980. Black Invisibility and Racism in Appalachia: An Informal Survey. Appalachian Journal, Vol. 8, 1 (1980), 48--54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40932362 Publisher: Appalachian Journal & Appalachian State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Banny S. K. Chan, Daniel Churchill, and Thomas K. F. Chiu. 2017. Digital Literacy Learning In Higher Education Through Digital Storytelling Approach. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), Vol. 13, 1 (May 2017), 1--16. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v13i1.9907Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Natalia Churchill, Hong Kong, Lim Cher Ping, Grace Oakley, and Daniel Churchill. 2008. Digital Storytelling and Digital Literacy Learning. (2008), 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lane W. Clarke. 2020. Walk a Day in My Shoes: Cultivating Cross-Cultural Understanding Through Digital Literacy. The Reading Teacher, Vol. 73, 5 (2020), 662--665. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1890 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/trtr.1890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. James S. Coleman. 1957. Community conflict. Glencoe, Ill.,. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015028774597Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Appalachian Regional Commission. [n.,d.] a. About the Appalachian Region. https://www.arc.gov/about-the-appalachian-region/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Appalachian Regional Commission. [n.,d.] b. Addressing Substance Abuse in Appalachia. https://www.arc.gov/addressing-substance-abuse-in-appalachia/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Appalachian Regional Commisson. [n.,d.]. Appalachian Region Health Disparities and Bright Spots. Fact sheet. https://www.arc.gov/report/appalachian-region-health-disparities-and-bright-spots/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Angela Cooke-Jackson and Elizabeth K. Hansen. 2008. Appalachian Culture and Reality TV: The Ethical Dilemma of Stereotyping Others. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, Vol. 23, 3 (Aug. 2008), 183--200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520802221946Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Daniela De Angeli, Daniel J. Finnegan, Lee Scott, Anna Bull, and Eamonn O'Neill. 2018. Agonistic Games: Multiperspective and Unsettling Games for a Social Change. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. ACM, Melbourne VIC Australia, 103--108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3270594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jordan Stangle Debra Wright, Brittany Cunningham. 2016. The Appalachian Region: A Report Identifying and Addressing the Region's Educational Needs. Technical Report. U.S. Department of Education, Appalachia Regional Advisory Committee. https://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/rac/appalachian-region.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharon A. Denham. 2016. Does a Culture of Appalachia Truly Exist? Journal of Transcultural Nursing, Vol. 27, 2 (March 2016), 94--102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615579712 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Carl DiSalvo. 2010. Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism. In Design and Complexity - DRS International Conference 2010, Bousbaci R. Chen L Gauthier P. Poldma T. Roworth-Stokes S. Durling, D. and E Stolterman (Eds.). https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drsconference-papers/drs2010/researchpapers/31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Carl DiSalvo. 2011. Community and conflict. interactions, Vol. 18, 6 (2011), 24--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, Brisbane QLD Australia, 656--671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Abigail Durrant and David Kirk. 2018. On Ethical Responsiveness: Being Answerable to Others as an HCI Researcher. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 30, 2 (March 2018), 99--115. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwx021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Constance Elam. 2002. Culture, Poverty and Education in Appalachian Kentucky., Vol. 18, 1 (2002), 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Raphael S. Ezekiel. 2002. An ethnographer looks at neo-Nazi and Klan. The American Behavioral Scientist (Sep 2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Gary Alan Fine. 2019. Relational Distance and Epistemic Generosity: The Power of Detachment in Skeptical Ethnography. Sociological Methods & Research 4 (Nov. 2019), 828--849.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. R Edward Freeman, Jeffrey S Harrison, Andrew C Wicks, Bidhan L Parmar, and Simone De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions, Vol. 3, 6 (Dec. 1996), 16--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Batya Friedman, Peter H Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2008. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. (2008), 27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. M Garside. 2021. Appalachian region - coal-mining employment 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/215789/coal-mining-employment-in-the-appalachian-region-by-mine-type/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Aakash Gautam, Chandani Shrestha, Andrew Kulak, Steve Harrison, and Deborah Tatar. 2018. Participatory tensions in working with a vulnerable population. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2. ACM, Hasselt and Genk Belgium, 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210629Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Chu Hiang Goh and Narayanan Kulathuramaiyer. 2020. Developing an Indigenous Cultural Values Based Emoji Messaging System: A Socio-Technical Systems Innovation Approach. In 12th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, Southampton United Kingdom, 32--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394332.3402826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Erik Grönvall, Lone Malmborg, and Jörn Messeter. 2016. Negotiation of values as driver in community-based PD. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1. ACM, Aarhus Denmark, 41--50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2940299.2940308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. John Christopher Haddox. 2018. Impact of Design on Patient Participation in Healthcare in a Rural Health Clinic in Appalachia: A Qualitative Pilot Study. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, Vol. 11, 1 (Jan. 2018), 31--39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717696701 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Benjamin V Hanrahan, Ning F Ma, Eber Betanzos, and Saiph Savage. 2020. Reciprocal Research: Providing Value in Design Research from the Outset in the Rural United States. (2020), 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jean Hardy, Susan Wyche, and Tiffany Veinot. 2019. Rural HCI Research: Definitions, Distinctions, Methods, and Opportunities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Wilburn Hayden. 2002. In Search of Justice: White Privilege in Appalachia. Journal of Appalachian Studies, Vol. 8, 1 (2002), 120--131. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41446518 Publisher: [Appalachian Studies Association, Inc., University of Illinois Press].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Amanda Hayes. 2017. Place, Pedagogy, and Literacy in Appalachia. English Education (2017), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10. ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1311. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lilly C. Irani and M. Six Silberman. 2016. Stories We Tell About Labor: Turkopticon and the Trouble with "Design". In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 4573--4586. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858592Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Naomi Jacobs and Alina Huldtgren. 2018. Why value sensitive design needs ethical commitments. Ethics and Information Technology (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018--9467--3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Sukwoo Jang, Minsun Hong, and Youn-kyung Lim. 2019. Ally-Opponent Understanding: Co-existence of Conflicting Values through Participatory Design., Vol. 2, 2 (2019), 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. M. Laeeq Khan, Howard T. Welser, Claudia Cisneros, Gaone Manatong, and Ika Karlina Idris. 2020. Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: Understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 50 (July 2020), 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101380Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Melissa Latimer and Ann M. Oberhauser. 2004. Exploring Gender and Economic Development in Appalachia. Journal of Appalachian Studies, Vol. 10, 3 (2004), 269--291. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41446640 Publisher: [Appalachian Studies Association, Inc., University of Illinois Press].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Sara Lawrence, Zachary Oliver, Michael Hogan, Sara VanLear, Jim Baller, John Horrigan, Mark Johnson, Jane Smith Patterson, and Ashley Stelfox andDeborah Watts. 2015. Program Evaluation of the Appalachian Regional Commission's Telecommunications and Technology Projects: FY 2004-FY 2010. Technical Report. Appalachian Regional Commisson. https://www.arc.gov/report/program-evaluation-of-the-appalachian-regional-commissions-telecommunications-and-technology-projects-fy-2004-fy-2010/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Christopher A. Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the Gate: Gaining Access, Building Rapport, and Co-Constructing Community-Based Research. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 1348--1358. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675147Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Philip G Lewin. 2019. "Coal is Not Just a Job, It's a Way of Life": The Cultural Politics of Coal Production in Central Appalachia. Social Problems, Vol. 66, 1 (Feb. 2019), 51--68. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Helen Matthews Lewis, Linda Johnson, and Donald Askins. 1978. Colonialism in modern America: the Appalachian case. OCLC: 1064511767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Sue McKemmish, Frada Burstein, Rosetta Manaszewicz, Julie Fisher, and Joanne Evans. 2012. INCLUSIVE RESEARCH DESIGN. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 15 (Sept. 2012), 1--30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.707225Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Bharat Mehra, Vandana Singh, Natasha Hollenbach, and Robert P. Partee. 2017. Rural Librarians as Change Agents in the Twenty-First Century: Applying Community Informatics in the Southern and Central Appalachian Region to Further ICT Literacy Training. In Rural and Small Public Libraries: Challenges and Opportunities, Brian Real (Ed.). Advances in Librarianship, Vol. 43. Emerald Publishing Limited, 123--153. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065--283020170000043006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Jessica K. Miller, Batya Friedman, and Gavin Jancke. 2007. Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Conference on supporting group work - GROUP '07. ACM Press, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 281. https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Wendy Moncur. 2013. The emotional wellbeing of researchers: considerations for practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013), 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Jerry W. Morris. 1979. The Aesthetics of Rural Appalachia's Poverty Culture. Appalachian Heritage, Vol. 7, 1 (1979), 25--31. https://doi.org/10.1353/aph.1979.0035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Hannele Niemi, Vilhelmiina Harju, Marianna Vivitsou, Kirsi Viitanen, Jari Multisilta, and Anne Kuokkanen. 2014. Digital Storytelling for 21st-Century Skills in Virtual Learning Environments. Creative Education, Vol. 05, 09 (2014), 657--671. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.59078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Ann M. Oberhauser. 1995. Gender and Household Economic Strategies in Rural Appalachia. Gender, Place & Culture, Vol. 2, 1 (March 1995), 51--70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699550022080Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Guy Larry Osborne. 2004. Fighting Racism in Appalachia: A Progress Report from the Grassroots. Journal of Appalachian Studies, Vol. 10, 1/2 (2004), 143--151. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41446612 Publisher: [Appalachian Studies Association, Inc., University of Illinois Press].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Kevin Oshnock. 2019. Recent Republican Dominance in Appalachia. Master's thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Signe Pedersen. 2020. Staging negotiation spaces: A co-design framework. Design Studies, Vol. 68 (May 2020), 58--81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.02.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Roberto Pereira, Samuel B. Buchdid, and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2012. Keeping Values in Mind - Artifacts for a Value-oriented and Culturally Informed Design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 2. 25--34. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003996800250034Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Chaundel Presley. 2013. Cultural Awareness: Enhancing Clinical Experiences in Rural Appalachia. Nurse Educator, Vol. 38, 5 (2013), 223--226. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182a0e556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. George Revill and John R. Gold. 2018. "Far Back in American Time": Culture, Region, Nation, Appalachia, and the Geography of Voice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 108, 5 (Sept. 2018), 1406--1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1431104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jennifer L. Rice and Brian J. Burke. 2018. Building More Inclusive Solidarities for Socio-Environmental Change: Lessons in Resistance from Southern Appalachia. Antipode, Vol. 50, 1 (2018), 212--232. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12336 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/anti.12336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Matthew S. Richards. 2019. "Normal for His Culture": Appalachia and the Rhetorical Moralization of Class. Southern Communication Journal, Vol. 84, 3 (Aug. 2019), 152--169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2019.1566399 Publisher: Southern States Communication Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Campbell Robertson. 2019. They Were Promised Coding Jobs in Appalachia. Now They Say It Was a Fraud. The New York Times (May 2019). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/12/us/mined-minds-west-virginia-coding.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Bernard R. Robin. 2008. Digital Storytelling: A Powerful Technology Tool for the 21st Century Classroom. Theory Into Practice, Vol. 47, 3 (July 2008), 220--228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Cara Robinson. 2015. An Exploration of Poverty in Central Appalachia: Questions of Culture, Industry, and Technology. KOME, Vol. 3, 2 (Dec. 2015), 75--89. https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2015.26Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Amalia G. Sabiescu, Salomão David, Izak van Zyl, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2014. Emerging spaces in community-based participatory design: reflections from two case studies. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers - PDC '14. ACM Press, Windhoek, Namibia, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661446Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Alaa Sadik. 2008. Digital storytelling: a meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 56, 4 (Aug. 2008), 487--506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008--9091--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Susan Sarnoff. 2003. Central Appalachia--Still the Other America. Journal of Poverty, Vol. 7, 1--2 (Jan. 2003), 123--139. https://doi.org/10.1300/J134v07n01_07Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Hanna Schneider, Florian Lachner, Malin Eiband, Ceenu George, Purvish Shah, Chinmay Parab, Anjali Kukreja, Heinrich Hussmann, and Andreas Butz. 2018. Privacy and personalization: the story of a cross-cultural field study. Interactions, Vol. 25, 3 (April 2018), 52--55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197571Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Rachel Charlotte Smith and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2018. Participatory design for sustainable social change. Design Studies, Vol. 59 (Nov. 2018), 9--36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Marina Henrieke Sonneveld. 2014. Positive Ethics in Design Education. DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations (Sept. 2014), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Brandon M. Stump. 2009. From Reconstruction to Obama: Understanding Black Invisibility, Racism in Appalachia, and the Legal Community's Responsibility to Promote a Dialogue on Race at the WVU College of Law. West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 112, 3 (2009), 1095--1138. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wvb112&i=1095Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Linda C. Tillman. 2002. Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American Perspective. Educational Researcher, Vol. 31, 9 (Dec. 2002), 3--12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031009003 Publisher: American Educational Research Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Job Timmermans and Brent Mittelstadt. 2014. Reflexivity and Value-Sensitive Design. (2014), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Austin Toombs, Shad Gross, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. From Empathy to Care: A Feminist Care Ethics Perspective on Long-Term Researcher--Participant Relations. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 29, 1 (Jan. 2017), 45--57. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Paris France, 429--438. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Shilumbe Chivuno-Kuria, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Nicola J. Bidwell, and Edwin Blake. 2010. Being participated: a community approach. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC '10. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Daisy Yoo, Anya Ernest, Sofia Serholt, Eva Eriksson, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Service Design in HCI Research: The Extended Value Co-creation Model. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019. ACM, Nottingham United Kingdom, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363401Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Stephen T. Young. 2017. Wild, Wonderful, White Criminality: Images of "White Trash" Appalachia. Critical Criminology, Vol. 25, 1 (March 2017), 103--117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-016--9326--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing for Shared Values: Exploring Ethical Dilemmas of Conducting Values Inclusive Design Research

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
        CSCW
        November 2022
        8205 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3571154
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 November 2022
        Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader