skip to main content
10.1145/3555228.3555258acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Impact of the Group Maturity on the Software Development Team Effectiveness: an Experience Report

Published: 05 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Project-Based Learning (PBL) is an active learning method in which students gain knowledge and skills by exploring real-world problems for an extended period of time. Existing studies point out that soft skills related to working in groups, such as communication skills, teamwork skills, and problem-solving skills, can be enhanced through PBL. Aspects of the group are fundamental to the success of any software project. In this context, this work seeks to investigate the group’s maturity and its relationship with the effectiveness of Agile Software Development teams in PBL. To do so, we conduct a study in the context of a discipline of the Software Engineering graduate course in which PBL is adopted. At the end of the semester, a questionnaire was applied to eight teams of graduating students, involving a total of 29 students, to measure aspects of the group’s maturity, later these aspects were correlated with the effectiveness of the teams. The obtained results point out that group maturity and team effectiveness are directly correlated. The results also show three aspects of group maturity that, if improved, will possibly improve the effectiveness of teams in software development: mutual trust, backup behavior and cohesiveness. Furthermore, from this experience we were able to derive some assumptions and directions for supporting instructors to stimulate the improvement of the soft skills relevant to both team effectiveness and software industry when applying PLB in their classes.

References

[1]
Lilian Bacich and José Moran. 2018. Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora: uma abordagem teórico-prática. Penso Editora. https://books.google.com.br/books?id=TTY7DwAAQBAJ
[2]
Eduardo Fernandes Barbosa and Dácio Guimarães de Moura. 2013. Metodologias ativas de aprendizagem na educação profissional e tecnológica. Boletim Técnico do Senac 39, 2 (2013), 48–67.
[3]
Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie V Bennekum, Alistar Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, Jon Kern, Brian Marick, Robert C Martin, Steve Mellor, Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, and Dave Thomas. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Disponível em: http://agilemanifesto.org/. Acesso em: 20 de novembro 2021.
[4]
Charles C Bonwell and James A Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.ERIC.
[5]
Irene-Angelica Chounta, Sven Manske, and H Ulrich Hoppe. 2017. “From Making to Learning”: introducing Dev Camps as an educational paradigm for Re-inventing Problem-based Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14, 1(2017), 1–15.
[6]
Luis Eduardo Cipolla. 2016. Aprendizagem baseada em projetos: a educação diferenciada para o século XXI. Tradução: Fernando de Siqueira Rodrigues, Porto Alegre: Penso, 2015. Escrito por William N. Bender. Administração: ensino e pesquisa 17, 3 (2016), 567–585.
[7]
Lee J Cronbach. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika 16, 3 (1951), 297–334.
[8]
Neide Aparecida Arruda de Oliveira and João Augusto Mattar Neto. 2018. Folhetim Lorenianas: aprendizagem baseada em projetos, pesquisa e inovação responsáveis na educação. Revista e-Curriculum 16, 2 (2018), 341–363.
[9]
Xiaomei Du, Jie Han, 2016. A literature review on the definition and process of Project-Based Learning and other relative studies. Creative Education 7, 07 (2016), 1079.
[10]
P David Elrod and Donald D Tippett. 1999. An empirical study of the relationship between team performance and team maturity. Engineering Management Journal 11, 1 (1999), 7–14.
[11]
Deborah L Feltz and Cathy D Lirgg. 1998. Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey.Journal of applied psychology 83, 4 (1998), 557.
[12]
Marilyn E Gist, Catherine Schwoerer, and Benson Rosen. 1989. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training.Journal of applied psychology 74, 6 (1989), 884.
[13]
Lucas Gren, Richard Torkar, and Robert Feldt. 2017. Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies. Journal of Systems and Software 124 (2017), 104–119.
[14]
José Demontier Guedes, Antonielle Serafim de Souza, Francisca Maraysa Luciano Sidrim, and Quenilda Fernandes de Oliveira Lima. 2017. Pedagogia de Projetos: uma ferramenta para a aprendizagem. ID on line REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA 10, 33 (2017), 237–256.
[15]
Martin Hoegl and Hans Georg Gemuenden. 2001. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization science 12, 4 (2001), 435–449.
[16]
Martin Höst, Björn Regnell, and Claes Wohlin. 2000. Using students as subjects—a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment. Empirical Software Engineering 5, 3 (2000), 201–214.
[17]
Timothy A Judge. 1997. The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in organizational behavior 19 (1997), 151–188.
[18]
Timothy A Judge and Joyce E Bono. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.Journal of applied Psychology 86, 1 (2001), 80.
[19]
Joann Keyton. 2002. Communicating in groups: Building relationships for effective decision making. McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.
[20]
Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt. 2014. Scottish, English, British?: innovations in attitude measurement. Language and Linguistics Compass 8, 11 (2014), 610–617.
[21]
Ahmad M Mahasneh and Ahmed F Alwan. 2018. The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Student Teacher Self-Efficacy and Achievement.International Journal of Instruction 11, 3 (2018), 511–524.
[22]
Christopher OLH Porter. 2005. Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams.Journal of Applied Psychology 90, 4 (2005), 811.
[23]
Sandra L Ramírez-Mora and Hanna Oktaba. 2017. Productivity in agile software development: a systematic mapping study. In 2017 5th international conference in software engineering research and innovation (CONISOFT). IEEE, 44–53.
[24]
Sandra L Ramírez-Mora, Hanna Oktaba, and Juana Patlan Perez. 2020. Group maturity, team efficiency, and team effectiveness in software development: A case study in a CMMI-DEV Level 5 organization. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 32, 4 (2020), e2232.
[25]
John REIDY and Christine P DANCEY. 2006. Estatística sem matemática para psicologia: SPSS Usando SPSS para Windows. Editora: Artmed (2006).
[26]
John R Schermerhorn Jr, Richard N Osborn, Mary Uhl-Bien, and James G Hunt. 2011. Organizational behavior. john wiley & sons.
[27]
Bruce W Tuckman. 1965. Developmental sequence in small groups.Psychological bulletin 63, 6 (1965), 384.
[28]
Acacia M Warren. 2016. Project-based learning across the disciplines: Plan, manage, and assess through+ 1 pedagogy. Corwin Press.
[29]
Susan A Wheelan. 2009. Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small group research 40, 2 (2009), 247–262.
[30]
Susan A Wheelan, Christian N Burchill, and Felice Tilin. 2003. The link between teamwork and patients’ outcomes in intensive care units. American Journal of Critical Care 12, 6 (2003), 527–534.
[31]
Susan A Wheelan and Jan Kesselring. 2005. Link between faculty group: Development and elementary student performance on standardized tests. The journal of educational research 98, 6 (2005), 323–330.
[32]
Susan A Wheelan, Donald Murphy, Eisaku Tsumura, and Sheryl Fried Kline. 1998. Member perceptions of internal group dynamics and productivity. Small Group Research 29, 3 (1998), 371–393.
[33]
Susan A Wheelan and Felice Tilin. 1999. The relationship between faculty group development and school productivity. Small group research 30, 1 (1999), 59–81.
[34]
Trevor Williams and Kitty Williams. 2010. Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations.Journal of educational Psychology 102, 2 (2010), 453.
[35]
Steven Wolk. 1994. Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose.Educational Leadership 52, 3 (1994), 42–45.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SBES '22: Proceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
October 2022
457 pages
ISBN:9781450397353
DOI:10.1145/3555228
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 October 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Agile Software Development
  2. Group Maturity
  3. Project-Based Learning
  4. Team Effectiveness

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SBES 2022
SBES 2022: XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
October 5 - 7, 2022
Virtual Event, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 147 of 427 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 98
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media