skip to main content
10.1145/3555228.3555260acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Empirical Studies of an Educational Tool for Project Management based on PMBOK using Problem-Based Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The adopted Project Management (PM) process and management tool can determine the success or failure of a project. Academia and industry have developed many tools, techniques, and methods to assist the PM process. The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®) aggregates a set of PM practices widely used in industry and academia. Based on the literature on the area, some gaps remain, such as the lack of tools helping the PM learning process, i.e., an issue related to the adequacy of a web-based tool in educational contexts. This study aims to introduce an educational approach based on problem-based learning and a novel educational tool covering all the knowledge areas of PMBOK®, namely Silver Bullet, that contributes to the PM process in educational contexts and supports our approach. To evaluate Silver Bullet, we conducted two empirical studies involving undergraduate students as subjects using problem-based learning in a software project manager: a quasi-experiment and a case study. We conclude that the Silver Bullet helps project managers in classroom environments by reducing the effort inherent in a PM execution process. Besides, some improvements in scoping the teaching-learning process are observed, such as activity verification, lessons learned board and log registers. Thus, we present relevant findings directing ongoing improvement.

References

  1. P. Brereton, B. A. Kitchenham, D. Budgen, and Z. Li. 2008. Using a Protocol Template for Case Study Planning. In 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. BCS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. D. Cook, D. T. Campbell, and W. Shadish. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. J. Cronbach. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika (1951), 297–334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 8 (1989), 982–1003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. R. M. de Oliveira. 2019. Silver Bullet: Uma Ferramenta Educacional Colaborativa para o Gerenciamento de Projetos com base no PMBOK. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6591485 Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. M. de Oliveira and et al.2020. PMST - Project Management Software Tool. Registro INPI: BR 51 2020 001426 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Dolmans, W. De Grave, I. Wolfhagen, and C. Van Der Vleuten. 2005. Problem-based Learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education 39, 7 (2005), 732–741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Hodgson. 2002. Disciplining the Professional: The Case of Project Management. Journal of Management Studies 39 (09 2002), 803–821.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Kerzner. 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. KPMG, AIPM and IPMA. 2019. The Future of Project Management: Global Oulook 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. J. O’Grady. 2012. Practical Problem-Based Learning in Computing Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 12, 3 (jul 2012), 16 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. PMI. 2021. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge and the Standard for Project Management (7thed.). Project Management Institute. 250 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Runeson and M. Höst. 2009. Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Case Study Research in Software Engineering. Emp. Softw. Eng. 14, 2 (2009), 131–164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. A. Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6(1980), 1161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Sajad, M. Sadiq, K. Naveed, and M.S. Iqbal. 2016. Software Project Management: Tools assessment, Comparison and suggestions for future development. Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 16, 1 (2016), 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. Tolfo and J. P. S. Silva. 2017. Ensino de Gestão de Projetos de Software Mediado pela Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas (1sted.). Ediurcamp, 115–133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A. Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in software engineering. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Empirical Studies of an Educational Tool for Project Management based on PMBOK using Problem-Based Learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SBES '22: Proceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
          October 2022
          457 pages
          ISBN:9781450397353
          DOI:10.1145/3555228

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 October 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format