skip to main content
10.1145/3555228.3555261acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Functional Suitability Assessment:: A Preliminary Study on Perceptions and Trends Observed in Software Industry

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The demand for software that is executed in different contexts and by different users brings to light the importance of evaluating the quality attribute “functional suitability”, since this software attribute deals with the completeness of functionalities and the correctness of their executions, always appropriate to specific contexts. Despite recommendations on the subject, ISO SQuaRE 25000 recommends what needs to be evaluated when functional suitability is observed. The abstraction inherent in this process may present itself as an obstacle in adhering to these standards. Therefore, this paper presents the results of an opinion survey conducted through interviews with software companies in order to understand the perceptions and trends regarding the evaluation of functional suitability in the software industry. The results, although initial and not generalizable, supported the discussions on the quality assessment process, as well as the tools and metrics adopted, in addition to the stakeholders involved. It was observed in a preliminary way that the concept of this attribute is sometimes unknown, and sometimes ignored, given the complexity and the cost of performing tests to measure it. Completeness and correctness are the most analyzed characteristics, to the detriment of the functional appropriateness, which is measured indirectly through the acceptance of the delivered functionalities.

References

  1. Ian Sommerville. 2019. Engenharia de Software (10ª ed). Tradução Luis Cláudio Queiroz; Revisão técnica Fabio Levy Siqueira - São Paulo: Pearson, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Roger Pressman. 2011. Engenharia de Software: Uma Abordagem Profissional (7ª ed). Tradução Ariovaldo Griesi; Revisão técnica Reginaldo Arakaki, Julio Arakaki, Renato Manzan de Andrade. Porto Alegre : AMGH, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Armando Fox e David Patterson. 2014. Engineering Software as a Service: An Agile Approach Using Cloud Computing. Obtido em http://www.saasbook.info/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ISO / IEC 25000. 2014. Systems and Software Engineering — Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — Guide to SQuaRE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Claes Wohlin, Per Runeson, Martin Hst, Magnus C. Ohlsson, Bjrn Regnell e Anders Wessln. 2012. Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbara A. Kitchenham e Shari Lawrence Pfleeger. 2002. Principles of Survey Research part 2: designing a survey. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 27, 1 (January 2002), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/566493.566495Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Klaas-Jan Stol, Paul Ralph e Brian Fitzgerald. 2016. Grounded theory in software engineering research: A critical review and guidelines. In 2016 IEEE ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 120–131. ISSN: 1558-1225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Maria Salviati. 2017. Manual do Aplicativo Iramuteq. Obtido em http://www.iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/manual-do-aplicativo-iramuteq-par-maria-elisabeth-salviatiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. SEBRAE. 2013. Anuário do trabalho na micro e pequena empresa. Obtido em https://www.sebrae.com.br/Sebrae/Portal%20Sebrae/Anexos/Anuario%20do%20Trabalho%20Na%20Micro%20e%20Pequena%20Empresa_2013.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Moisés Rodríguez , Jesús Ramón Oviedo e Mario Piattini.2016. Evaluation of software product functional suitability: a case study. Software Quality Professional, vol. 18, n. 3, p. 18, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ajeng Puspaningrum, Siti Rochimah e Rizky Akbar. 2017. Functional Suitability Measurement using Goal-Oriented Approach based on ISO/IEC 25010 for Academics Information System. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence 3.2 (2017): 68-74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Functional Testing vs. Usability Testing. Qualitest. Obtido em https://www.qualitestgroup.com/white-papers/functional-testing-vs-usability-testing/#:∼:text=A%20simple%20way%20to%20think,and%20successfully%20use%20the%20productGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zoltan German Sallo, Horatiu Stefan Grif e Adrian Gligor. "Functional suitability analysis of remote laboratories in engineering education." Procedia Technology 22 (2016): 1169-1175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ali Idri, Mariam Bachiri, José Luis Fernández-Aleman e Ambrosio Toval. 2017. ISO/IEC 25010 Based Evaluation of Free Mobile Personal Health Records for Pregnancy Monitoring, 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Turin, 2017, pp. 262-267, doi: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Functional Suitability Assessment:: A Preliminary Study on Perceptions and Trends Observed in Software Industry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SBES '22: Proceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
      October 2022
      457 pages
      ISBN:9781450397353
      DOI:10.1145/3555228

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format