skip to main content
research-article

Ladange, Adange, Jeetange: The Farmers' Movement and Its Virtual Spaces

Published:11 November 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The farmers' movement began in November 2020, when more than 300,000 protesters marched towards New Delhi in India in opposition to new agrarian acts introduced by the Indian central government. Organised by over 400 farmers' unions along with other organisations, for the next year, farmers and allied protesters set up bases around New Delhi and sustained the movement leading to its eventual success. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with participants from the movement and explored the social organisation, the underlying technical infrastructures, and how collective action was organised. We outline how the social media ecosystem enabled hybrid forms of organisational structures and facilitated coalition-building between diverse groups. Further, the movement created and disseminated alternative media that opposed mainstream media narratives and facilitated community-building. We discuss how designed technologies and spaces can support social movements in the face of powerful antagonistic actors.

References

  1. A Aga. 2021. Farm protests in India are writing the green revolution's obituary. Scientific American (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sheetal D Agarwal, Michael L Barthel, Caterina Rost, Alan Borning, W Lance Bennett, and Courtney N Johnson. 2014. Grassroots organizing in the digital age: Considering values and technology in Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street. Information, Communication & Society , Vol. 17, 3 (2014), 326--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Nusrat Jahan Mim, and Steven J Jackson. 2015. Residual mobilities: infrastructural displacement and post-colonial computing in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 437--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Anuroop. 2021. Martyr List. https://trolleytimes.com/martyrs/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chris Atton. 2007. Current issues in alternative media research. Sociology Compass, Vol. 1, 1 (2007), 17--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. NITI Ayog. 2016. Evaluation study on role of public distribution system in shaping household and nutritional security India. Policy , Vol. 72 (2016), 80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Joe Bandy and Jackie Smith. 2005. Factors affecting conflict and cooperation in transnational movement networks. Coalitions across borders: Transnational protest and the neoliberal order (2005), 231--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Veronica Barassi. 2013. Ethnographic cartographies: Social movements, alternative media and the spaces of networks. Social Movement Studies , Vol. 12, 1 (2013), 48--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Amita Baviskar and Michael Levien. 2021. Farmers' protests in India: introduction to the JPS Forum. The Journal of Peasant Studies , Vol. 48, 7 (nov 2021), 1341--1355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1998002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Neeladri Bhattacharya. 2019. The great agrarian conquest: The colonial reshaping of a rural world. SUNY Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J Patrick Biddix. 2010. Technology uses in campus activism from 2000 to 2008: Implications for civic learning. Journal of College Student Development , Vol. 51, 6 (2010), 679--693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Nicola J Bidwell. 2020. Women and the Sustainability of Rural Community Networks in the Global South. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kathleen M. Blee and Verta Taylor. 2002. Semi-Structured Interviewing in Social Movement Research. In Methods of Social Movement Research, , Bert Klandermans and Suzanne Staggenborg (Eds.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, London, 92--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. William K Carroll and Robert A Hackett. 2006. Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, culture & society , Vol. 28, 1 (2006), 83--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Victoria Carty and Francisco G Reynoso Barron. 2019. Social movements and new technology: The dynamics of cyber activism in the digital age. In The Palgrave handbook of social movements, revolution, and social transformation. Springer, 373--397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Manuel Castells. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society 2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Manuel Castells, Mireia Ferná ndez-Ardè vol, Jack Linchuan Qiu, and Araba Sey. 2007. Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective Manuel. Number July. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. https://doi.org/0262033550Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Priyank Chandra. 2016. Order in the warez scene: explaining an underground virtual community with the CPR framework. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 372--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Priyank Chandra. 2017. Informality and invisibility: Traditional technologies as tools for collaboration in an informal market. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 4765--4775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Priyank Chandra, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Joyojeet Pal. 2017. Market practices and the bazaar: Technology consumption in ICT markets in the global south. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 4741--4752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Priyank Chandra and Jay Chen. 2019. Taming the Amazon: the domestication of online shopping in Bangalore, India. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Karma R Chávez. 2011. Counter-public enclaves and understanding the function of rhetoric in social movement coalition-building. Communication Quarterly , Vol. 59, 1 (2011), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Graeme Chesters. 2012. Social Movements and the Ethics of Knowledge Production. Social Movement Studies , Vol. 11, 2 (2012), 145--160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.664894Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Man Aman Singh Chhina. 2021. Only a few farmers protesting against farm laws, most stand behind PM's decisions: Shekhawat. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/only-a-few-farmers-protesting-against-farm-laws-most-stand-behind-pms-decisions-shekhawat-7595825/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Harry Cleaver. 1999. Computer-linked social movements and the global threat to capitalism. On-line. Available HTTP: http://www. eco. utexas. edu/Homepages/faculty/Cleaver/polnet. html (8 April 2005) (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Elisabeth S Clemens and Debra C Minkoff. 2004. Beyond the iron law: Rethinking the place of organizations in social movement research. The Blackwell companion to social movements (2004), 155--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Débora de Castro Leal, Max Krüger, Kaoru Misaki, David Randall, and Volker Wulf. 2019. Guerilla Warfare and the Use of New (and Some Old) Technology: Lessons from FARC's Armed Struggle in Colombia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Donatella Della Porta and Mario Diani. 2020. Social movements: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. DHNS. 2021. From 'Khalistanis' to defeat 'anti-national' forces: Rhetoric Around Farmers Protest Comes a Full Circle. https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/from-khalistanis-to-defeat-of-anti-national-forces-rhetoric-around-farmers-protest-comes-a-full-circle-1052696.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jill P Dimond. 2012. Feminist HCI for real: Designing technology in support of a social movement. Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Leonhard Dobusch and Sigrid Quack. 2011. Interorganisationale Netzwerke und digitale Gemeinschaften. In Organisation und Umwelt. Springer, 171--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Ulrich Dolata. 2018. Social Movements: The Sociotechnical Constitution of Collective Action. In Collectivity and Power on the Internet. Springer, 31--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Richard Flacks. 2005. The Question of Relevance in Social Movement Studies. In Rhyming Hope and History: Activists, Academics, and Social Movement Scholarship, , David Croteau, William Hoynes, and Charlotte Ryan (Eds.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, London, 3--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Nancy Fraser. 1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, Vol. 25/26, 25 (1990), 56--80. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315822174--11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Christian Fuchs. 2006. The self-organization of cyberprotest. The Internet Society II. Advances in Education, Comerce & Governance (2006), 275--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. William A. Gamson. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. The Dorsey Press, Illinois.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jordana J George and Dorothy E Leidner. 2019. From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization , Vol. 29, 3 (2019), 100249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Paolo Gerbaudo. 2014. The persistence of collectivity in digital protest. Information, Communication & Society , Vol. 17, 2 (2014), 264--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Sucha S Gill. 2005. Economic distress and farmer suicides in rural Punjab. JPS, Vol. 12, 2 (2005), 220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sucha Singh Gill. 2020. Recent Farmers ' Movement in Punjab : Organisation , Stages of Mobilisation and Achievements. JSPS, Vol. 29, 1 & 2 (2020), 123--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeff Goodwin and James M Jasper. 2014. The social movements reader: Cases and concepts. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Paridhi Gupta. 2020. Art(s) of visibility: resistance and reclamation of university spaces by women students in Delhi. Gender, Place and Culture , Vol. 27, 1 (2020), 86--103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1586652Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Paridhi Gupta. 2021. The Researcher of/in Crisis: Writing Resistances During the Pandemic. Communication, Culture and Critique , Vol. 14, 2 (2021), 365--368. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab025Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Human Cost of Farmers Protest. 2020. Deaths in Farmers' Protest 2020. https://humancostoffarmersprotest.blogspot.com/2020/12/list-of-deaths-in-farmers-protest-at.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hyesun Hwang and Kee-Ok Kim. 2015. Social media as a tool for social movements: The effect of social media use and social capital on intention to participate in social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies , Vol. 39, 5 (2015), 478--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Margaret Jack, Jay Chen, and Steven J Jackson. 2017. Infrastructure as creative action: Online buying, selling, and delivery in Phnom Penh. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6511--6522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Christophe Jaffrelot. 2013. Refining the moderation thesis. Two religious parties and Indian democracy: The Jana Sangh and the BJP between Hindutva radicalism and coalition politics. Democratization, Vol. 20, 5 (2013), 876--894. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.801256Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Christophe Jaffrelot. 2015. The Modi-centric BJP 2014 election campaign: new techniques and old tactics. Contemporary South Asia , Vol. 23, 2 (2015), 151--166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2015.1027662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Surinder S. Jodhka. 2021. Why are the farmers of Punjab protesting? The Journal of Peasant Studies , Vol. 48, 7 (nov 2021), 1356--1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1990047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Jeffrey S Juris. 2015. Embodying protest: Culture and performance within social movements. In Anthropology, theatre, and development. Springer, 82--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Tejal Kanitkar, Sudha Mahalingam, and R Srikanth. 2020. Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2020: Inviting a Bigger Crisis. Economic and Political Weekly , Vol. 55, 41 (2020), 40--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Anastasia Kavada. 2020. Creating the collective: social media, the Occupy Movement and its constitution as a collective actor. In Protest Technologies and Media Revolutions. Emerald Publishing Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Khadija Khan. 2021. Delhi High Court restrains Twitter handle 'TRACTOR 2 TWITER' from publishing defamatory material against Aaj Tak. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/aaj-tak-asks-delhi-high-court-take-down-defamatory-content-tractor-2-twitterGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Yong Ming Kow, Yubo Kou, Bryan Semaan, and Waikuen Cheng. 2016. Mediating the undercurrents: Using social media to sustain a social movement. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3883--3894.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Yong Ming Kow, Bonnie Nardi, and Wai Kuen Cheng. 2020. Be Water: Technologies in the Leaderless Anti-ELAB Movement in Hong Kong. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Satendra Kumar. 2021. Class, caste and agrarian change: the making of farmers' protests. The Journal of Peasant Studies , Vol. 48, 7 (nov 2021), 1371--1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1990046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Doug McAdam. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930--1970. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.2307/2149752Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Doug McAdam, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2004. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Patrick McCurdy. 2012. Social movements, protest and mainstream media. Sociology Compass, Vol. 6, 3 (2012), 244--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Jessica McLean. 2020. "It's Just Coding': Disability Activism In, and About, Digital Spaces. In Changing Digital Geographies. Springer, 229--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Douglas M. McLeod. 2007. News Coverage and Social Protest : How the Media's Protest Paradigm Exacerbates Social Conflict. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1 (2007), 185--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. David S. Meyer. 2005. Scholarship That Might Matter. In Rhyming Hope and History: Activists, Academics, and Social Movement Scholarship, , David Croteau, William Hoynes, and Charlotte Ryan (Eds.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, London, 191--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Stefania Milan. 2013. Social movements and their technologies: Wiring social change. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Nusrat Jahan Mim. 2021. Gospels of Modernity: Digital Cattle Markets, Urban Religiosity, and Secular Computing in the Global South. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Aparna Moitra, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Priyank Chandra. 2021. Parsing the'Me'in# MeToo: Sexual Harassment, Social Media, and Justice Infrastructures. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Blake Morgan. 2021. WhatsApp Controversey Shows Just How Much Privacy Matters To Customers. https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2021/01/14/whatsapp-controversy-shows-just-how-much-privacy-matters-to-customers/'sh=3530349bff33Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Daniel J Myers. 1994. Communication technology and social movements: Contributions of computer networks to activism. Social Science Computer Review , Vol. 12, 2 (1994), 250--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Anthony Oberschall. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Gail Omvedt. 1982. Class Caste and Land in India: An Introductory Essay. In Land, Caste and Politics in Indian States, Gail Omvedt (Ed.). Authors Guild, Delhi, 9--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Gabriel Ondetti. 2008. Land, Protest, and Politics: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for Agrarian Reform in Brazil. Vol. 11. The Pennsylvania State University. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00292.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Natalie Pang and Yue Ting Woo. 2020. What about WhatsApp? A systematic review of WhatsApp and its role in civic and political engagement. First Monday (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Sunil Prabhu and Chandrashekhar Srinivasan. 2021. "Only Group Of Farmers Protesting": Government In Farm Laws Repeal Note. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/farm-laws-repealed-only-group-of-farmers-protesting-government-in-farm-laws-repeal-note-2627247Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Vignesh Radhakrishnan and Singaravelu Naresh. 2020. Data | Even in States with limited procurement, farmers wanted MSP programme to continue - The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/data/data-even-in-states-with-limited-procurement-farmers-wanted-msp-programme-to-continue/article32798325.eceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Adam D Reich. 2017. The organizational trace of an insurgent moment: Occupy Wall Street and New York City's social movement field, 2004 to 2015. Socius , Vol. 3 (2017), 2378023117700651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Muhammad Sadi Adamu. 2021. Rethinking Technology Design and Deployment in Africa: Lessons from an African Standpoint. In 3rd African Human-Computer Interaction Conference: Inclusiveness and Empowerment. 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Twitter Safety. 2020. Updates on our response to blocking orders from the Indian Government. https://blog.twitter.com/en_in/topics/company/2020/twitters-response-indian-governmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Pedro Sanches, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Asreen Rostami, and Barry Brown. 2020. Under Surveillance: Technology Practices of those Monitored by the State. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Amandeep Sandhu. 2019. Panjab: Journeys Through Fault Lines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Sidhartha, Vishwa Mohan, and Akhilesh Singh. 2020. Leftist, Maoist elements have infiltrated farmer stir: Piyush Goyal. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/leftist-maoist-elements-have-infiltrated-farmer-stir-piyush-goyal/articleshow/79688107.cmsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Shreya Sinha. 2020. The Agrarian crisis in Punjab and the making of the anti-farm law protests. In The India Forum, November. https://www. theindiaforum. in/article/agrarian-crisis-punjaband-making-anti-farm-law-protests.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. David A. Snow. 2013. Framing and Social Movements. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, , D. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, and D. McAdam (Eds.). Blackwell, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosf065Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Catherine R Squires. 2002. Rethinking the black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication theory, Vol. 12, 4 (2002), 446--468.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. M.N. Srinivas. 1962. Caste in Modern India and Other Essays. Asia Publishing House, Bombay.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2011. " Voluntweeters" self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1071--1080.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) will the revolution be retweeted? Information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In Proceedings of the acm 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 7--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Emiliano Treré. 2020. The banality of WhatsApp: On the everyday politics of backstage activism in Mexico and Spain. First Monday , Vol. 25 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Kenneth H Tucker. 2018. The political is personal, expressive, aesthetic, and networked: Contemporary American languages of the self from Trump to Black Lives Matter. American Journal of Cultural Sociology , Vol. 6, 2 (2018), 359--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of communication , Vol. 62, 2 (2012), 363--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Marlon Twyman, Brian C Keegan, and Aaron Shaw. 2017. Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia: Collective memory and collaboration around online social movements. In Proceedings of the 2017 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1400--1412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Nella Van Dyke and Bryan Amos. 2017. Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success. Sociology Compass, Vol. 11, 7 (2017), e12489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Nella Van Dyke and Holly J McCammon. 2010. Strategic alliances: Coalition building and social movements. U of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Pete Wright, Evika Karamagioli, Eleni-Revekka Staiou, Dimitris Gouscos, Rowan Thorpe, Antonio Krüger, Johannes Schöning, Matt Jones, et al. 2017. HCI, solidarity movements and the solidarity economy. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3126--3137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Prateek Waghre. 2021. Radically Networked Societies: The case of the farmers' protests in India. Indian Public Policy Review , Vol. 2, 3 (May-Jun) (2021), 41--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Steve Walker and Andy Dearden. 2005. Designing for civil society. , 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Dan Wang, Alessandro Piazza, and Sarah A Soule. 2018. Boundary-spanning in social movements: Antecedents and outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology , Vol. 44 (2018), 167--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Volker Wulf, Konstantin Aal, Ibrahim Abu Kteish, Meryem Atam, Kai Schubert, Markus Rohde, George P Yerousis, and David Randall. 2013. Fighting against the wall: Social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1979--1988. ioGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ladange, Adange, Jeetange: The Farmers' Movement and Its Virtual Spaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW
      November 2022
      8205 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3571154
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2022
      Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader