Abstract
Despite increasing work investigating the accessibility of research tools, most accessibility research has traditionally focused on popular, mainstream, or web technologies. We investigated barriers and workarounds blind and low vision doctoral students in computing-intensive disciplines experienced and engaged, respectively, when using advanced technical tools for research tasks. We conducted an observation and interview study with eight current and former Ph.D. students, closely analyzing the accessibility of specific tasks. Our findings contextualize how inaccessible tools complicate research tasks, adding time and effort, and exacerbating social entanglements in collaborative relationships. This work contributes empirical data that extricates how in/accessibility of advanced technical tools used in research influences productivity and collegial efforts.
- Amaia Aizpurua, Simon Harper, and Markel Vigo. 2016. Exploring the relationship between web accessibility and user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 91 (2016), 13--23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.008Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khaled Albusays and Stephanie Ludi. 2016. Eliciting programming challenges faced by developers with visual impairments: exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82--85.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khaled Albusays, Stephanie Ludi, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2017. Interviews and observation of blind software developers at work to understand code navigation challenges. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91--100.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang Bai, Jenna Grzeslo, Ryan Y Wang, Bumgi Min, and Krishna Jayakar. 2019. Does Accessible Design Benefit General Users of E-Government? Examining the Relationship between Website Usability and Accessibility. In Examining the Relationship between Website Usability and Accessibility (July 26, 2019). TPRC47: The 47th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy. TPRC, McKinney, TX, 31 pages.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Catherine M Baker, Lauren R Milne, and Richard E Ladner. 2015. Structjumper: A tool to help blind programmers navigate and understand the structure of code. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 3043--3052.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cynthia L Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In Proceedings of the 20th international acm sigaccess conference on computers and accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161--173.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cynthia L Bennett, Daniela K Rosner, and Alex S Taylor. 2020. The care work of access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey P. Bigham, Irene Lin, and Saiph Savage. 2017. The Effects of ?Not Knowing What You Don't Know" on Web Accessibility for Blind Web Users. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 101--109. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132533Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Blythe, Andrew Monk, and Jisoo Park. 2002. Technology biographies: field study techinques for home use product development. In CHI'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 658--659.Google Scholar
- Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. In The 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163--171.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sheryl Burgstahler, E. Moore, and L. Crawford. 2016. 2016 Report of the AccessSTEM/AccessComputing/DO-IT Longitudinal Transition Study (ALTS). University of Washington, Seattle, WA. https://www.washington.edu/doit/about/evidencebased-practices/indicators-participant-successGoogle Scholar
- Maria Claudia Buzzi, Marina Buzzi, Barbara Leporini, and Giulio Mori. 2012. Designing E-Learning Collaborative Tools for Blind People. In E-Learning, Elvis Pontes, Anderson Silva, Adilson Guelfi, and Sergio Takeo Kofuji (Eds.). IntechOpen, Rijeka, Chapter 7, 125--144. https://doi.org/10.5772/31377Google Scholar
- Mary Elizabeth Collins and Carol Mowbray. 2005. Higher Education and Psychiatric Disabilities: A National Survey of Campus Disability Services. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 75, 2 (April 2005), 304--315. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0002--9432.75.2.304Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maitraye Das, Darren Gergle, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. " It doesn't win you friends" Understanding Accessibility in Collaborative Writing for People with Vision Impairments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--26.Google Scholar
- Richard Devlin and Dianne Pothier. 2006. Introduction: Toward a Critical Theory of Dis-Citizenship. In Critical Disability Theory: Essays in Philosophy, Politics, Policy, and Law, Dianne Pothier and Richard Devlin (Eds.). UBC Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1--22.Google Scholar
- Jay Timothy Dolmage. 2017. Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9708722Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clifford Geertz. 2008. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The cultural geography reader, Timothy Oakes and Patricia L. Price (Eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, Chapter 4, 29--39.Google Scholar
- Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine Publishing Co, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Teri Hibbs and Dianne Pothier. 2006. Post-Secondary Education and Disabled Students: Mining a Level Playing Field or Playing in a Minefield? In Critical Disability Theory: Essays in Philosophy, Politics, Policy, and Law, Dianne Pothier and Richard Devlin (Eds.). UBC Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 195--219.Google Scholar
- Megan Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia L. Bennett. 2020. Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416996Google ScholarDigital Library
- Earl W. Huff, Kwajo Boateng, Makayla Moster, Paige Rodeghero, and Julian Brinkley. 2020. Examining The Work Experience of Programmers with Visual Impairments. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). IEEE, New York, NY, 707--711. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME46990.2020.00077Google Scholar
- Dhruv Jain, Venkatesh Potluri, and Ather Sharif. 2020. Navigating Graduate School with a Disability: A Trio-Ethnography. In Proceedings of ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1--11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simeon Keates and P. Clarkson. 2003. Countering design exclusion: Bridging the gap between usability and accessibility. Universal Access in the Information Society 2 (01 2003), 215--225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0059--5Google Scholar
- Deborah Rock Kendrick. 2017. Disability Services at Institutions of Higher Education. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Washington. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1972443236 Dissertation/Thesis.Google Scholar
- Kimia Kiani, Parmit K. Chilana, Andrea Bunt, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2020. ?I Would Just Ask Someone": Learning Feature-Rich Design Software in the Modern Workplace. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, New York, NY, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC50065. 2020.9127288Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelly Mack, Maitraye Das, Dhruv Jain, Danielle Bragg, John Tang, Andrew Begel, Erin Beneteau, Josh Urban Davis, Abraham Glasser, Joon Sung Park, et al. 2021. Mixed Abilities and Varied Experiences: a group autoethnography of a virtual summer internship. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly Mack, Emma J. McDonnell, Venkatesh Potluri, Maggie Xu, Jailyn Zabala, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia L. Bennett. 2022. Anticipate and Adjust: Cultivating Access in Human-Centered Methods. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501882Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sean Mealin and Emerson Murphy-Hill. 2012. An exploratory study of blind software developers. In 2012 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY, USA, 71--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Salda na. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Aile Montoya. 2009. A comparison of the educational supports needed and provided for undergraduate and graduate students with learning disabilities in higher education. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar
- Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 152--158.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Improving a human-computer dialogue. Commun. ACM 33, 3 (March 1990), 338--348.Google Scholar
- Maulishree Pandey, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Hrishikesh V. Rao, Sile O'Modhrain, and Steve Oney. 2021. Understanding Accessibility and Collaboration in Programming for People with Visual Impairments. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 129 (apr 2021), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449203Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Quinn Patton. 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Helen Petrie and Omar Kheir. 2007. The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In Proceedings of the 2007 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 397--406. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/7394/Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh Potluri, Tadashi E Grindeland, Jon E Froehlich, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2021. Examining Visual Semantic Understanding in Blind and Low-Vision Technology Users. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh Potluri, Priyan Vaithilingam, Suresh Iyengar, Y Vidya, Manohar Swaminathan, and Gopal Srinivasa. 2018. Codetalk: Improving programming environment accessibility for visually impaired developers. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Power, André Freire, Helen Petrie, and David Swallow. 2012. Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 433--442.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dagfinn Rømen and Dag Svanæs. 2012. Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled users. Universal Access in the Information Society 11, 4 (2012), 375--385.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harini Sampath, Alice Merrick, and Andrew Macvean. 2021. Accessibility of Command Line Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 489, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445544Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Gerard Schoeberlein and Yuanqiong Wang. 2014. Usability Evaluation of an Accessible Collaborative Writing Prototype for Blind Users. Journal of Usability Studies 10, 1 (2014), 26--45.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margrit Shildrick. 2012. Critical Disability Studies. In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, Nick Watson (Ed.). Routledge, London, 12 pages.Google Scholar
- Kristen Shinohara, Michael McQuaid, and Nayeri Jacobo. 2020. Access Differential and Inequitable Access: Inaccessibility for Doctoral Students in Computing. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '20. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 12 pages pages.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristen Shinohara, Mick McQuaid, and Nayeri Jacobo. 2021. The Burden of Survival: How Doctoral Students in Computing Bridge the Chasm of Inaccessibility. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1--13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ann C Smith, Justin S Cook, Joan M Francioni, Asif Hossain, Mohd Anwar, and M Fayezur Rahman. 2003. Nonvisual tool for navigating hierarchical structures. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 77--78 (2003), 133--139.Google Scholar
- James P Spradley. 2016. Participant observation. Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.Google Scholar
- Kevin M Storer, Harini Sampath, and M. Alice Merrick. 2021. "It's Just Everything Outside of the IDE That's the Problem": Information Seeking by Software Developers with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 487, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445090Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anselm L. Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Sarit Felicia Anais Szpiro, Shafeka Hashash, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. How people with low vision access computing devices: Understanding challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171--180.Google Scholar
- Murtaza Tamjeed, Vinita Tibdewal, Madison Russell, Michael McQuaid, Tae Oh, and Kristen Shinohara. 2021. Understanding Disability Services Toward Improving Graduate Student Support. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1--14.Google Scholar
- John Tang. 2021. Understanding the Telework Experience of People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 (04 2021), 1--27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449104Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mary Frances Theofanos and Janice Redish. 2003. Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability. interactions 10, 6 (2003), 36--51.Google Scholar
- Bess Williamson. 2015. Access. NYU Press, New York, NY, 14--17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15nmhws.6Google Scholar
- Anon Ymous, Katta Spiel, Os Keyes, Rua M. Williams, Judith Good, Eva Hornecker, and Cynthia L. Bennett. 2020. ?I am just terrified of my future" Epistemic Violence in Disability Related Technology Research.. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381828Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zeynep Yildiz and Ozge Subasi. 2020. Disabled and Design Researcher: An Unexpected Relationship?. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 61--66.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Usability, Accessibility and Social Entanglements in Advanced Tool Use by Vision Impaired Graduate Students
Recommendations
Teaching Accessibility: A Design Exploration of Faculty Professional Development at Scale
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationMost CS students learn little about accessibility in higher education; this is partly because most CS faculty know little about accessibility. Unfortunately, higher education CS faculty lack a model of professional development for learning to teach new ...
Evaluation of a university website’s usability for visually impaired students
AbstractToday websites are the tools most commonly used to access information. People with disabilities face difficulties accessing or using information, and the importance of website usability in their lives needs to be recognized. Visually impaired ...
Perceptions of accessibility and usability by blind or visually impaired persons: a pilot study
ASIST '16: Proceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & TechnologyThis pilot study utilizes qualitative interviews to explore perceptions of accessibility and usability from the perspective of blind or visually impaired (BVI) persons. Using the frameworks of everyday life information seeking (ELIS) and the sense-...
Comments