skip to main content
10.1145/3555776.3577622acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graph-based semi-supervised classification for similar wildfire dynamics

Published:07 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wildfires happen in almost all biomes worldwide, and they can cause profound environmental and socio-economical impacts. Fire regimes are emergent properties of a complex system (e.g., climate-vegetation-fire interactions), which are influenced by many factors, such as climate warming, geography, vegetation, and human activity. In particular, anthropogenic land use can alter wildfires' incidence, size, season, and severity. Consequently, it is paramount to understand fire regimes to characterize similar spatiotemporal wildfire activity between natural or human ignition dynamics. This study proposes a framework combining complex networks and machine learning to classify similar wildfire regions. From global satellite data over the past two decades, we extract graph-based features to characterize spatiotemporal fire regimes from different Tropical/Temperate/Boreal forests around the globe. With the extracted high-level features, we can classify how dynamically similar the wildfire regimes are between six studied regions: Amazon basin (AMZ), Australia (AUS), northwest U.S. (NUS), northeast China (NCN), and central Africa (CAF) and Asia (CAS). Results from well-known classification algorithms indicate that the AMZ and CAF wildfire dynamics are more similar than the other regions. Although we found that wildfires in NUS are more similar to the AUS regime, NUS has around 33% of similar behavior to wildfires in the AMZ.

References

  1. 2020. MCD14DL - MODIS/Aqua+Terra Thermal Anomalies/Fire locations 1km FIRMS V006 NRT. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N. Andela, D. C. Morton, L. Giglio, Y. Chen, G. R. van der Werf, P. S. Kasibhatla, R. S. DeFries, G. J. Collatz, S. Hantson, S. Kloster, D. Bachelet, M. Forrest, G. Lasslop, F. Li, S. Mangeon, J. R. Melton, C. Yue, and J. T. Randerson. 2017. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science 356, 6345 (2017), 1356--1362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sally Archibald, Caroline E. R. Lehmann, Jose L. Gómez-Dans, and Ross A. Bradstock. 2013. Defining pyromes and global syndromes of fire regimes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 16 (2013), 6442--6447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rui Ba, Chen Chen, Jing Yuan, Weiguo Song, and Siuming Lo. 2019. SmokeNet: Satellite smoke scene detection using convolutional neural network with spatial and channel-wise attention. Remote Sensing 11, 14 (2019), 1702.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lilian Berton, Alneu de Andrade Lopes, and Didier A Vega-Oliveros. 2018. A comparison of graph construction methods for semi-supervised learning. In 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Matthias M Boer, Victor Resco De Dios, Elisa Z Stefaniak, and Ross A Bradstock. 2021. A hydroclimatic model for the distribution of fire on Earth. Environmental Research Communications 3, 3 (mar 2021), 035001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Geographic Area Coordination Center. 2020. National Large Incident Year to Date Report. https://gacc.nifc.gov/sacc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Olivier Chapelle, Bernhard Schlkopf, and Alexander Zien. 2010. Semi-Supervised Learning (1st ed.). The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Matheus A. De Castro Santos, Didier A. Vega-Oliveros, Liang Zhao, and Lilian Berton. 2020. Classifying El Niño-Southern Oscillation Combining Network Science and Machine Learning. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 55711--55723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Leonardo N Ferreira, Didier A Vega-Oliveros, Moshé Cotacallapa, Manoel F Cardoso, Marcos G Quiles, Liang Zhao, and Elbert EN Macau. 2020. Spatiotemporal data analysis with chronological networks. Nature Communications 11, 1 (2020), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Leonardo N. Ferreira, Didier A. Vega-Oliveros, Liang Zhao, Manoel F. Cardoso, and Elbert E.N. Macau. 2020. Global fire season severity analysis and forecasting. Computers & Geosciences 134 (2020), 104339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mike Flannigan. 2015. Fire evolution split by continent. Nature Geoscience 8 (Mar 2015), 167--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Omid Ghorbanzadeh, Khalil Valizadeh Kamran, Thomas Blaschke, Jagannath Aryal, Amin Naboureh, Jamshid Einali, and Jinhu Bian. 2019. Spatial prediction of wildfire susceptibility using field survey GPS data and machine learning approaches. Fire 2, 3 (2019), 43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Louis Giglio, Wilfrid Schroeder, and Christopher O. Justice. 2016. The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products. Remote Sensing of Environment 178 (2016), 31 -- 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nature Publishing Group. 2019. The complexities of wildfires. Nature Geoscience 12 (Feb 2019), 81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Piyush Jain, Sean CP Coogan, Sriram Ganapathi Subramanian, Mark Crowley, Steve Taylor, and Mike D Flannigan. 2020. A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management. Environmental Reviews 28, 4 (2020), 478--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Janice Nelson. 2020. Geoscience Australia's Oliver Discusses Use of Landsat during Country's Historic Fires. https://www.usgs.gov/center-news/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. E. J. Newman. 2010. Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Australian Government Bureau of Metereology. 2021. Bushfire weather. http://www.bom.gov.au/weather-services/fire-weather-centre/bushfire-weather/index.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Thanh Cong Phan and Thanh Tam Nguyen. 2019. Remote Sensing Meets Deep Learning: Exploiting Spatio-Temporal-Spectral Satellite Images for Early Wildfire Detection. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zixing Song, Xiangli Yang, Zenglin Xu, and Irwin King. 2022. Graph-based semi-supervised learning: A comprehensive review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahyat Shafapour Tehrany, Simon Jones, Farzin Shabani, Francisco Martínez-Álvarez, and Dieu Tien Bui. 2019. A novel ensemble modeling approach for the spatial prediction of tropical forest fire susceptibility using logitboost machine learning classifier and multi-source geospatial data. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 137, 1 (2019), 637--653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Marj Tonini, Mirko D'Andrea, Guido Biondi, Silvia Degli Esposti, Andrea Trucchia, and Paolo Fiorucci. 2020. A Machine Learning-Based Approach for Wildfire Susceptibility Mapping. The Case Study of the Liguria Region in Italy. Geosciences 10, 3 (2020), 105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Didier A Vega-Oliveros, Moshé Cotacallapa, Leonardo N Ferreira, Marcos G Quiles, Liang Zhao, Elbert EN Macau, and Manoel F Cardoso. 2019. From spatio-temporal data to chronological networks: An application to wildfire analysis. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. 675--682.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wikipedia. 2019. 2019 Amazon rainforest wildfires. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Amazon_rainforest_wildfiresGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wikipedia. 2020. 2020 California wildfires. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_California_wildfiresGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yuto Yamaguchi, Christos Faloutsos, and Hiroyuki Kitagawa. 2016. Camlp: Confidence-aware modulated label propagation. In SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 513--521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Yi Zhao, Jiale Ma, Xiaohui Li, and Jie Zhang. 2018. Saliency detection and deep learning-based wildfire identification in UAV imagery. Sensors 18, 3 (2018), 712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Graph-based semi-supervised classification for similar wildfire dynamics

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SAC '23: Proceedings of the 38th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
            March 2023
            1932 pages
            ISBN:9781450395175
            DOI:10.1145/3555776

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 June 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader