skip to main content
10.1145/3555858.3555904acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Genetic Game Criticism

Published:04 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper serves as a brief introduction to the practice of genetic game criticism. Genetic criticism is an approach to the study of textual works that specifically analyses the production process of these works, and the different versions the work took on during its creation. I argue that similarly approaching digital games as fluid, coded artefacts is a useful strategy for game analysis. As digital games inherently contain different versions of themselves, including translations and cut content, they form an ideal object of study for genetic critics. In the last part of this paper, I illustrate how a kind of “folk genetic game criticism” is already fruitfully being performed, with specific reference to YouTuber Lance McDonald's investigations of alpha versions of Dark Souls III.

References

  1. Aarseth, Espen. 2003. “Playing Research: Methodological Approaches to Game Analysis.” In Game Approaches / Spiel-Veje. Papers from Spilforskning.Dk Conference, August 28.-29. 2003, 1–7. Melbourne.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, W. Ruffin. 2008. Hacks, Mods, Easter Eggs, and Fossils. Intentionality and Digitalism in the Video Game. In Playing the past: History and nostalgia in video games, Zach Whalen and Laurie N. Taylor (Eds.). Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Beardsley, Monroe C. 1981. Aesthetics, problems in the philosophy of criticism. Hackett Publishing, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernaerts, Lars and Dirk Van Hulle. 2013. Narrative across versions: narratology meets genetic criticism. Poetics Today 34, 3 (2013), 281-326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dark Souls Wiki. Ocelotte. Retrieved May 25, 2022 from https://darksouls.fandom.com/wiki/OcelotteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, Oliver. 2002. The author at work in genetic criticism. Paragraph 25, 1 (March 2002), 92-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2002.25.1.92Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. de Duve, Thierry. 1998. How Manet's A Bar at the Folies-Bergère Is Constructed. Translated by Brian Holmes and Thierry de Duve. Critical Inquiry 25, 1 (1998), 136 – 68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Deppman, Jed, Daniel Ferrer, and Michael Groden, eds. 2004. Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. FromSoftware. 2016. Dark Souls III. [PlayStation 4]. Bandai Namco Entertainment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay, Louis. 1967. Des manuscrites, pour quoi faire? Le Monde (February 1967).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenny, Laurent. 1996. Genetic Criticism and its Myths. Translated by Richard Watts. Yale French Studies 89 (1996), 9-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinderman, William and Joseph E. Jones. (Eds.). 2009. Genetic criticism and the creative process: Essays from music, literature, and theater. University Rochester Press, Rochester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Marino, Mark C. 2020. Critical Code Studies. MIT Press, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McDonald, Lance. 2018. Dark Souls 3 Alpha Cut Content :: Oceiros and Baby Ocelotte :: Unseen Version. Video. (19 March 2018). Retrieved May 25, 2022 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prownnvrwdoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. McDonald, Lance. 2018. Dark Souls 3 Unseen Content - Archdragon Peak Alpha Design - Cut Boss Areas. Video. (2 March 2019). Retrieved May 25, 2022 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E89o_75Or2UGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rockstar North. 2004. Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. [PlayStation 2]. Rockstar Games.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Schiesel, Seth. Video Game Known for Violence Lands in Trouble Over Sex. New York Times (2005). Retrieved May 25, 2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/21/technology/video-game-known-for-violence-lands-in-trouble-over-sex.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shillingsburg, Peter. 1996. Scholarly Editing in the Computer Age: Theory and Practice. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Willumsen, Ea C. 2017. Source code and formal analysis: A reading of Passage. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 3, 2 (2017), 213-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v3i2.74Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wimsatt, William K., and Monroe C. Beardsley. 1946. The Intentional Fallacy. The Sewanee Review 54, 3 (September 1946), 468–488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    FDG '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
    September 2022
    664 pages
    ISBN:9781450397957
    DOI:10.1145/3555858

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate152of415submissions,37%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format