skip to main content
10.1145/3555858.3555945acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Hybrid ludomythologies: Mythanalysis, tradition, and contemporaneity in Death Stranding

Published: 04 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The project we present here analyses myths, mythemes, and mythical structures in games from a double perspective: as an update of a transcendent cultural heritage and as a mythical fabric shaped by ludic rituals and common affordances. The recurrent nature of myths establishes, through transcendent and immanent structures, old and new, a cultural space where our societies negotiate their fears, aspirations, and concerns. The main hypothesis of the project is that myths, both from a transcendent perspective (myths in the present) and from an immanent one (myths of the present), have in games a space for ideological and narrative development that helps in understanding contemporary society. We aim to show not only the validity of myths even in the most contemporary forms of culture, but also the constant creation of new mythical structures to make meaning from the world. To do so, our project uses mythanalysis as its main methodological tool, placing our view of games firmly in the Humanities. In this presentation, we firstly present and unpack the application of myth-analysis in games and secondly explore the possibility of what we call “hybrid myths”, or games that combine myths in the present and myths of the present. We do so by studying Death Stranding (Kojima Productions, 2019] from both perspectives and analysing how both sides are connected in the game.

References

[1]
Mircea Eliade. 1999. Mito y realidad. Kairós, Barcelona.
[2]
Karl Kerényi and Carl G. Jung. 2004. Introducción a la esencia de la mitología. Editorial Siruela, Madrid.
[3]
Ángeles Martínez García. 2017. La mitocrítica como propuesta de estudio de la imagen en la era digital. In Ángeles Martínez García (ed.). La imagen en la era digital, 27-40. Egregius Ediciones, Sevilla.
[4]
Karen Armstrong. 2005. A short history of myth. Canongate Books, Edinburgh.
[5]
Juan José Fernández Díaz. 1996. Los sentidos del mito. Análisis comparativo de las visiones de R. Barthes, C. Levi-Strauss y K. Burridge. Revista murciana de antropología, (3), 9-20.
[6]
Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. The MIT Press, Massachusetts.
[7]
José Manuel Losada. 2010. Nociones de terminología mitocrítica. In Seminario Periódico del Grupo ACIS, 14 Abr 2010, Madrid.
[8]
Roland Barthes. 1999. Mitologías. Siglo XXI, Madrid.
[9]
Anthony G. Cirilla and Vincent E. Rone. 2020. Mythopoeic Narrative in the Legend of Zelda. Routledge, London.
[10]
Nicholas Cragoe. 2016. RPG Mythos: Narrative gaming as modern mythmaking. Games and Culture, 11(6), 583-607.
[11]
Gerald Farca, Alexander Lehner, and Víctor Navarro Remesal. 2020. Regenerative Play and the Experience of the Sublime: Breath of the Wild. In Mythopoeic Narrative in The Legend of Zelda. Routledge, 205-221.
[12]
Sunny Yoon. 2021. Mythical narratives in digital games and the digital apocalypse. Digital Creativity, 32(3), 234-249.
[13]
Vivian Asimos. 2018. Playing the myth: Video games as contemporary mythology. In Implicit Religion, 21 (1).
[14]
Robert Cassar. 2013. God of war: a narrative analysis. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 7(1), 81-99.
[15]
Javier Almodóvar García and José Ramón Canto Nieto. 2019. La Odisea en la casilla de salida del Juego de la Oca. Amaltea. Revista de mitrocrítica, 11, 87-101.
[16]
Robert W. Guyker. 2016. Myth in translation: the ludic imagination in contemporary video games. Ph.D. Dissertation. Pacifica Graduate Institute, California.
[17]
Ekaterina Galanina and Alexey Salin. 2016. Mythology construction in virtual worlds of video games. In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM 2017 Conference Proceedings, 507-514.
[18]
Ekaterina Galanina and Daniil A. Baturin. 2020. The trace of archaic myth in video games. In European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, Volume LXXVI, SCTCMG 2020, 3660-3667.
[19]
Fátima Gutiérrez. 2012. La mitocrítica de Gilbert Durand: teoría fundadora y recorridos metodológicos. Théleme. Revista Complutense de Estudios Franceses, 27, 175-189.
[20]
Gilbert Durand. 1982. Las estructuras antropológicas de lo imaginario. Taurus, Madrid.
[21]
Claude Lévi-Strauss. 2009. Antropología estructural. Siglo XXI, Madrid.
[22]
Robert Zubek. 2020. Elements of game design. The MIT Press, Massachusetts.
[23]
Espen Aarseth. 2007. I fought the law: Transgressive play and the implied player. In DiGRA '07 - Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, The University of Tokyo, September, 2007, 24-28.
[24]
Manuel Garin Boronat. 2009. Mitojuegos. Sobre el héroe y el mito en el imaginario Nintendo. Comunicación: Revista Internacional de Comunicación Audiovisual, Publicidad y Estudios Culturales, 1(7), 94-115.
[25]
Antonio José Planells de la Maza. 2019. he symbolic labyrinth in the mythogame: the axes Minos-Daedalus and Theseus-Minotaur in the contemporary video game. 11th international conference on videogame sciences and arts. 27-29 de noviembre, Universidade de Aveiro (Portugal).
[26]
Pablo Servigne and Raphaël Stevens. 2020. Colapsología. Arpa Editores, Barcelona.
[27]
David Noble. 2005. Beyond the promised land. The movement and the Myth. Between the Lines, Ontario.
[28]
Joaquín Mellado Rodríguez. 2006. Moisés y Rómulo y Remo: la historia y el mito. Veleia, 23, 25-39.
[29]
Alenda Y. Chang. 2019. Playing nature: Ecology in video games. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
FDG '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
September 2022
664 pages
ISBN:9781450397957
DOI:10.1145/3555858
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 November 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Myth
  2. Mythanalysis
  3. Mytheme
  4. hybrid myths

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España

Conference

FDG22

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 152 of 415 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 85
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media