skip to main content
10.1145/3555858.3555945acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Hybrid ludomythologies: Mythanalysis, tradition, and contemporaneity in Death Stranding

Published:04 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The project we present here analyses myths, mythemes, and mythical structures in games from a double perspective: as an update of a transcendent cultural heritage and as a mythical fabric shaped by ludic rituals and common affordances. The recurrent nature of myths establishes, through transcendent and immanent structures, old and new, a cultural space where our societies negotiate their fears, aspirations, and concerns. The main hypothesis of the project is that myths, both from a transcendent perspective (myths in the present) and from an immanent one (myths of the present), have in games a space for ideological and narrative development that helps in understanding contemporary society. We aim to show not only the validity of myths even in the most contemporary forms of culture, but also the constant creation of new mythical structures to make meaning from the world. To do so, our project uses mythanalysis as its main methodological tool, placing our view of games firmly in the Humanities. In this presentation, we firstly present and unpack the application of myth-analysis in games and secondly explore the possibility of what we call “hybrid myths”, or games that combine myths in the present and myths of the present. We do so by studying Death Stranding (Kojima Productions, 2019] from both perspectives and analysing how both sides are connected in the game.

References

  1. Mircea Eliade. 1999. Mito y realidad. Kairós, Barcelona.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Karl Kerényi and Carl G. Jung. 2004. Introducción a la esencia de la mitología. Editorial Siruela, Madrid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ángeles Martínez García. 2017. La mitocrítica como propuesta de estudio de la imagen en la era digital. In Ángeles Martínez García (ed.). La imagen en la era digital, 27-40. Egregius Ediciones, Sevilla.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Karen Armstrong. 2005. A short history of myth. Canongate Books, Edinburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Juan José Fernández Díaz. 1996. Los sentidos del mito. Análisis comparativo de las visiones de R. Barthes, C. Levi-Strauss y K. Burridge. Revista murciana de antropología, (3), 9-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. The MIT Press, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. José Manuel Losada. 2010. Nociones de terminología mitocrítica. In Seminario Periódico del Grupo ACIS, 14 Abr 2010, Madrid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Roland Barthes. 1999. Mitologías. Siglo XXI, Madrid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Anthony G. Cirilla and Vincent E. Rone. 2020. Mythopoeic Narrative in the Legend of Zelda. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicholas Cragoe. 2016. RPG Mythos: Narrative gaming as modern mythmaking. Games and Culture, 11(6), 583-607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gerald Farca, Alexander Lehner, and Víctor Navarro Remesal. 2020. Regenerative Play and the Experience of the Sublime: Breath of the Wild. In Mythopoeic Narrative in The Legend of Zelda. Routledge, 205-221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sunny Yoon. 2021. Mythical narratives in digital games and the digital apocalypse. Digital Creativity, 32(3), 234-249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Vivian Asimos. 2018. Playing the myth: Video games as contemporary mythology. In Implicit Religion, 21 (1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Robert Cassar. 2013. God of war: a narrative analysis. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 7(1), 81-99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Javier Almodóvar García and José Ramón Canto Nieto. 2019. La Odisea en la casilla de salida del Juego de la Oca. Amaltea. Revista de mitrocrítica, 11, 87-101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Robert W. Guyker. 2016. Myth in translation: the ludic imagination in contemporary video games. Ph.D. Dissertation. Pacifica Graduate Institute, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekaterina Galanina and Alexey Salin. 2016. Mythology construction in virtual worlds of video games. In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM 2017 Conference Proceedings, 507-514.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekaterina Galanina and Daniil A. Baturin. 2020. The trace of archaic myth in video games. In European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, Volume LXXVI, SCTCMG 2020, 3660-3667.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fátima Gutiérrez. 2012. La mitocrítica de Gilbert Durand: teoría fundadora y recorridos metodológicos. Théleme. Revista Complutense de Estudios Franceses, 27, 175-189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert Durand. 1982. Las estructuras antropológicas de lo imaginario. Taurus, Madrid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Claude Lévi-Strauss. 2009. Antropología estructural. Siglo XXI, Madrid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Robert Zubek. 2020. Elements of game design. The MIT Press, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Espen Aarseth. 2007. I fought the law: Transgressive play and the implied player. In DiGRA '07 - Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, The University of Tokyo, September, 2007, 24-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Manuel Garin Boronat. 2009. Mitojuegos. Sobre el héroe y el mito en el imaginario Nintendo. Comunicación: Revista Internacional de Comunicación Audiovisual, Publicidad y Estudios Culturales, 1(7), 94-115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Antonio José Planells de la Maza. 2019. he symbolic labyrinth in the mythogame: the axes Minos-Daedalus and Theseus-Minotaur in the contemporary video game. 11th international conference on videogame sciences and arts. 27-29 de noviembre, Universidade de Aveiro (Portugal).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pablo Servigne and Raphaël Stevens. 2020. Colapsología. Arpa Editores, Barcelona.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. David Noble. 2005. Beyond the promised land. The movement and the Myth. Between the Lines, Ontario.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Joaquín Mellado Rodríguez. 2006. Moisés y Rómulo y Remo: la historia y el mito. Veleia, 23, 25-39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Alenda Y. Chang. 2019. Playing nature: Ecology in video games. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    FDG '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
    September 2022
    664 pages
    ISBN:9781450397957
    DOI:10.1145/3555858

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate152of415submissions,37%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format