skip to main content
10.1145/3556089.3556093acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Technological Skills and Satisfaction for Post-pandemic Virtual Academic Continuity in Peruvian University Students, 2021

Published:30 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to find out the relationship between technological skills, satisfaction and academic continuity of university students in a post-pandemic scenario. The study population consisted of 392 students from Peruvian universities and the exploratory factor analysis of the items was carried out for the adaptation of the 03 original instruments applied called online class satisfaction, scale of technological skills and academic continuity, as well as discriminant validity. of the theoretical model. According to the results found, the study hypotheses are verified, affirming the direct and significant relationship between technological skills and satisfaction, satisfaction and intention to continue, intention to continue and technological skills. In this way, the importance of the role of institutions to support the development of technological skills and satisfaction in order to ensure the retention of their students is highlighted.

References

  1. S. Dunn, “The virtualizing of education,” Futurist, vol. 34, no. 2, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Mohamed, K. Subramanian, and H. Jayasuriya, “COVID-19 Impact on undergraduate education: academicians’ perspective,” J. Heal. Allied Sci. NU, vol. 10, no. 03, pp. 138–140, 2020, doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. Scherer, S. K. Howard, J. Tondeur, and F. Siddiq, “Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who's ready?,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 118, no. October 2020, p. 106675, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R. A. Llerena and C. A. Sánchez, “Emergency, management, vulnerability and responses to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru,” SciELO, p. 16, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. P. Alvarez and P. R. Harris, “Covid-19 in latin america: Challenges and opportunities,” Rev. Chil. Pediatr., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 179–182, 2020, doi: 10.32641/rchped.vi91i2.2157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Costa , “Enseñanza de enfermería en tiempos de covid-19: ¿cómo reinventarla en este contexto?,” Texto Context. - Enferm., vol. 29, pp. 1–3, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0104-07072020000100102&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. João and M. Carvalho-Filho, “Una nueva época para la educación médica después de la COVID-19,” FEM Rev. la Fund. Educ. Médica, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 55–57, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2014-98322020000200001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Britez, “La educación ante el avance del COVID-19 en Paraguay . Desarrollo La Organización Mundial de la Salud ( OMS ) define al COVID- 19 como: “ la enfermedad infecciosa causada por el coronavirus que se ha descubierto más recientemente . Tanto el nuevo virus c,” Scientific Electronic Library Online, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. O. Almohammed, L. Alotaibi, and S. Ibn, “Student and educator perspectives on virtual institutional introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE),” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 21, 2021, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs12909-021-02698-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. I. Bautista, G. Carrera, E. León, and D. Laverde, “Evaluación de satisfacción de los estudiantes sobre las clases virtuales,” Minerva Investig. Científica, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 5–12, 2020, doi: 10.47460/minerva.v1i2.6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Tapia-Repetto, C. Gutiérrez, and O. Tremillo-Maldonado, “Nuevas tecnologías en educación superior. Estudio de percepción en estudiantes acerca del uso de WhatsApp y Entornos Virtuales de Aprendizaje (Plataforma Moodle),” Odontoestomatologia, vol. 20, no. 33, pp. 37–43, 2019, doi: 10.22592/ode2019n33a5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. F. Chi-chung, B. Cheung, and C. Kent-Man, “A comparative study regarding distance learning and the conventional face-to-face approach conducted problem-based learning tutorial during the COVID-19 pandemic,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02575-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. Juanes, O. Munévar, and H. Cándelo, “La virtualidad en la educación. Aspectos claves para la continuidad de la enseñanza en tiempos de pandemia,” Rev. Conrado, vol. 16, no. 76, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rc/v16n76/1990-8644-rc-16-76-448.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. Velazque, C. J. Valenzuela, and F. Murillo, “Pandemia COVID-19: repercusiones en la educación universitaria,” Odontol. Sanmarquina, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 203–205, 2020, doi: 10.15381/os.v23i2.17766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. V. Rojas, A. Xeta, and R. Jiménez, “Competencias digitales en una universidad pública peruana,” Rev. Conrado, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. Serin, “Virtual reality in education from the perspective of teachers,” Rev. Amaz. Investig., vol. 9, no. 26, pp. 291–303, 2020, doi: 10.34069/ai/2020.26.02.33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. E. Erkut, “Higher Education after Covid-19,” Yuksekogretim Derg., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 125–133, 2020, doi: 10.2399/yod.20.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. H. De Boer, “COVID-19 in Dutch higher education,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 96–106, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1859684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Alabdulaziz, “COVID-19 and the use of digital technology in mathematics education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., no. 0123456789, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10602-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Bader, M. Salem, L. Ahmad, and M. Shikhali, “A silver lining of coronavirus: Jordanian universities turn to distance education,” Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJICTE.20210401.oa1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Cabero-Almenara, E. Vázquez-Cano, W. Villota-Oyarvide, and E. López-Meneses, “La innovación en el aula universitaria a través de la realidad aumentada. Análisis desde la perspectiva del estudiantado español y latinoamericano,” Rev. Electrónica Educ., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.15359/ree.25-3.1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. D. Millones-Liza and E. Garcia-Salirrosas, “Analysis of the loyalty and intention to return of the university student: Challenges of educational management in a crisis context.,” 2021 12th Int. Conf. E-business, Manag. Econ. ICEME 2021, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3481127.3481193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. Fernández-Enríquez and L. Delgado-Martín, “Augmented reality as a didactic resource for teaching mathematics,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10072560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. K. Bujak, I. Radu, R. Catrambone, B. Mackntyre, R. Zheng, and G. Golubski, “A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom,” Computer&Education, vol. 68, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. E. Coimbra, T. Cardoso, and A. Mateus, “Augmented Reality: An Enhancer for Higher Education Students in Math's Learning?,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 67, no. Dsai, pp. 332–339, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. S. Martínez, B. Fernández, and J. Barroso, “La realidad aumentada como recurso para la formación en la Educación Superior,” Campus virtuales, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://www.uajournals.com/campusvirtuales/journal/18/1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Cabero-Almenara and R. Roig-Vila, “The motivation of technological scenarios in Augmented Reality (AR): Results of different experiments,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 14, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9142907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. K. Yin, Z. He, J. Xiong, J. Zou, K. Li, and S. T. Wu, “Virtual reality and augmented reality displays: Advances and future perspectives,” JPhys Photonics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1088/2515-7647/abf02e.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. C. E. George, “Competencias digitales básicas para garantizar la continuidad académica provocada por el Covid-19,” Apertura, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 36–51, 2021, doi: 10.32870/ap.v13n1.1942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. B. Landrum, J. Bannister, G. Garza, and S. Rhame, “A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning,” J. Educ. Bus., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 82–88, 2020, doi: 10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. B. Landrum, “Examining students’ confidence to learn online, self-regulation skills and perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness of online classes,” Online Learn. J., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 128–146, 2020, doi: 10.24059/olj.v24i3.2066.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Y. Levy, “Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses,” Comput. Educ., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 185–204, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. L. Jung-Wan, “Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 277–283, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. R. Gopal, V. Singh, and A. Aggarwal, “Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19,” Educ. Inf. Technol., no. 0123456789, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. M. Basuony, R. EmadEldeen, M. Farghaly, N. El-Bassiouny, and E. Mohamed, “The factors affecting student satisfaction with online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study of an emerging Muslim country,” J. Islam. Mark., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 631–648, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2020-0301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. D. Lee, “Learning Presence and Learning Outcomes in Online Korean Language Classes -Focus on Learning Presence, Class Satisfaction, and Learning Persistence,” J. Int. Netw. Korean Lang. Cult., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 93–119, 2021, doi: 10.15652/ink.2021.18.1.093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. R. Roque-Hernández, J. Díaz-Roldán, A. López-Mendoza, and R. Salazar-Hernández, “Instructor presence, interactive tools, student engagement, and satisfaction in online education during the COVID-19 Mexican lockdown,” Interact. Learn. Environ., 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1912112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. I. Bartusevičienė, A. Pazaver, and M. Kitada, “Building a resilient university: ensuring academic continuity—transition from face-to-face to online in the COVID-19 pandemic,” WMU J. Marit. Aff., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 151–172, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13437-021-00239-x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Z. Khan, S. Sivasubramaniam, P. Anand, and A. Hysaj, “‘E’-Thinking teaching and assessment to uphold academic integrity: Lessons learned from emergency distance learning,” Int. J. Educ. Integr., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40979-021-00079-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. J. Dohaney, M. De Róiste, R. A. Salmon, and K. Sutherland, “Benefits, barriers, and incentives for improved resilience to disruption in university teaching,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 50, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. UNESCO, “El derecho a la Educación,” 2019. https://es.unesco.org/themes/derecho-a-educacion#:∼:text=Por su carácter de derecho,oportunidades y el acceso universal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. C. Regehr, N. Sioban, and A. Hildyard, “Academic continuity planning in higher education,” J. Bus. Contin. Emer. Plan., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jbcep/2017/00000011/00000001/art00008#Refs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. J. Cabero, O. Barroso, and M. Llorente, “Technology acceptance model & realidad aumentada: Estudio en desarrollo,” Rev. Lasallista Investig., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 18–26, 2016, doi: 10.22507/rli.v13n2a2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. E. Flores Ferro , “Nivel de satisfacción de las clases online por parte de los estudiantes de Educación Física de Chile en tiempos de pandemia,” Retos, vol. 2041, no. 41, pp. 123–130, 2020, doi: 10.47197/retos.v0i41.82907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. F. Reichheld and R. Markey, The ultimate question 2.0, Bain&Compa. United States, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.,” J. Mark. Res., vol. XVIII, no. February, pp. 39–50, 1981, doi: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002224378101800104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. W. Chin, The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling, NJ: Lawren. Mahwah, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. N. K. Malhotra and S. Dash, Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, vol. 31, no. 1. London: Pearson Publishing, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. P. Rivera-Vargas, T. Anderson, and C. Alonso, “Exploring students’ learning experience in online education: analysis and improvement proposals based on the case of a Spanish open learning university,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., no. 0123456789, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-10045-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. D. Mah and D. Ifenthaler, “Students’ perceptions toward academic competencies: The case of German first-year students,” Educ. Res., vol. 1, 28AD, doi: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.437867582603162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. J. Alexander, M. Barcellona, S. McLachlan, and C. Sackley, “Technology-enhanced learning in physiotherapy education: Student satisfaction and knowledge acquisition of entry-level students in the United Kingdom,” Res. Learn. Technol., vol. 27, no. 1063519, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.25304/rlt.v27.2073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. I. González, B. Cebreiro, and L. Casal, “Nuevas competencias digitales en estudiantes potenciadas con el uso de Realidad Aumentada. Estudio Piloto,” RIED. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. a Distancia, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 137, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27501 Cómo.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Y. Yung and P. Bentler, Bootstrapping techniques in analysis of mean and covariance structures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. N. Candolfi Arballo, M. E. Chan Nunez, and B. Rodriguez Tapia, “Technological Competences: A Systematic Review of the Literature in 22 Years of Study,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 4–30, 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i04.9118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. B. B. Lockee, “Online education in the post-COVID era,” Nat. Electron., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–6, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. I. Chakraborty and P. Maity, “COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 728, p. 138882, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. M. Treve, “What COVID-19 has introduced into education: challenges Facing Higher Education Institutions (HEIs),” High. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 212–227, 2021, doi: 10.1080/23752696.2021.1951616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. S. Van Nuland, D. Mandzuk, K. Tucker Petrick, and T. Cooper, “COVID-19 and its effects on teacher education in Ontario: a complex adaptive systems perspective,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 442–451, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1803050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. R. E. A. Westendorff, C. Mutch, and N. T. (Tom) Mutch, “When Covid-19 is only part of the picture: caring pedagogy in higher education in Guatemala,” Pastor. CARE Educ., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 236–249., 2021, doi: 10.1080/02643944.2021.1938648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. F. A. Faize and M. Nawaz, “Evaluation and Improvement of students’ satisfaction in online learning during COVID-19,” Open Prax., Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3316/informit.620310264783188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. E. T. Baloran, J. T. Hernan, and J. S. Taoy, “COURSE SATISFACTION AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING AMID COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL,” TURKISH ONLINE J. DISTANCE Educ., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–12, Oct. 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. E. García-Salirrosas, “Satisfaction of university students in virtual education in a COVID-19 scenario,” Pap. Present. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 41–47, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3446590.3446597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. M. Maqableh and M. Alia, “Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students’ satisfaction,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 128, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Technological Skills and Satisfaction for Post-pandemic Virtual Academic Continuity in Peruvian University Students, 2021

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEME '22: Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
      July 2022
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450396394
      DOI:10.1145/3556089

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader