skip to main content
10.1145/3556089.3556107acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Impact of Understanding Audit Risk, Auditor's Competency, and Fuzzy Logic Analysis to Materiality Level Consideration

Published:30 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Materiality has a significant role in the course of accounting, especially when it comes to auditing. It helps the auditor by holding the limitations of time and resources of the auditor's capabilities in evaluating the financial misstatements. The amount of audit procedures and evidence is determined depending on the materiality of misstatements. However, some cases have shown that misstatements that happened below the materiality could eventually lead to a financial shenanigan. Our quantitative research tries to analyze the factors that could affect materiality level. We use agency theory as the foundation of this research. Several variables that relate to the auditor's judgment of materiality are used to gain an understanding of its impact on materiality considerations. We use primary data from audit questionnaires and perform a statistical analysis to assess our hypothesis. The results suggest that the auditor's ability to understand audit risk, auditor's competency, and fuzzy logic analysis have a significant effect on the materiality level consideration. More than that, this research also suggests that fuzzy logic analysis could be used to help auditors in determining materiality level and it is able to drive qualitative factors of materiality.

References

  1. B. L. Handoko, H. H. Muljo, and A. Y. Budiarto, “The Connection and Underlying Cause between Financial Statement Fraud Cases,” 5th Int. Conf. E-bus. Internet (ICEBI 2021), 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. R. Hutauruk, Akuntansi Perusahaan Jasa Aplikasi Program Zahir, Jakarta Barat: Indeks, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. Zhou and G. Kapoor, "Detecting evolutionary financial statement fraud," Decision support systems, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 570-575, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. M. Johnstone, A. A. Gramling and L. E. Rittenberg, Auditing: A risk based-approach to conducting a quality audit, 10, Ed., Cengage Learning, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. E. Bellman and L. A. Zadeh, "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. B-141–B-164, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. L. Colbert and J. J. S. Jahera, "The Role of The Audit and Agency Theory," Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 7-12, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. G. Mihret, "How can we explain internal auditing? The inadequacy of agency theory and a labor process alternative," Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 771-782, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, ". Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.," Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305-360, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. B. Adams, "Agency Theory and the Internal Audit," Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 8-12, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. A. Lambert, "Agency Theory and Management Accounting," Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, pp. 247-268, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. I. S. Pertiwi and H. Herawati, "Pengaruh Risiko Audit Terhadap Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas," Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing, dan Perpajakan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14-19, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. O. Furiady and R. Kurnia, "The Effect of Work Experiences, Competency, Motivation, Accountability, and Objectivity towards Audit Quality," Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 211, pp. 328-335, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. L. Comunale and T. R. Sexton, "A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assessing Materiality," Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. E. Pierce, "Designing and Conducting Quantitative Research Studies," in Quantitative Health Research: Issues and Methods, Maidenhead, Open University Press, 2013, pp. 131-150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Abdullah, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2015, p. 226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Latief, "Analisis Pengaruh Produk, Harga, Lokasi dan Promosi terhadap Minat Beli Konsumen pada Warung Wedang Jahe," Jurnal Manajemen dan Keuangan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 90-99, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. Kwong and K. Wong, "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS," Marketing Bulletin, pp. 24-56, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. W. Wardhono, "Pengukuran Variabel," Bina Ekonomi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 12-28, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. IAASB, "Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit," Proposed International Standard on Auditing 320 (Revised), pp. 1097-1104, May 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. ISA 320, "Audit Materiality," 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. ISA 400, "Risk Assessment and Internal Control," 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Joldos, I. Stanciu and G. Grejdan, "Pillars of the audit activity: materiality and audit risk," OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PETROŞANI∼ ECONOMICS∼, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 225-238, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. I. Sukriah and B. Inapty, "Pengaruh pengalaman kerja, independensi, obyektifitas, integritas dan kompetensi terhadap kualitas hasil pemeriksaan," Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, vol. 12, no. 3-9, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. G. Hudiwinarsih, "Auditors’ Experience, Competency, and Their Iindependency as the Influencial Factors In Professionalism," Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 253-264, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S.-I. Chang, C.-F. Tsai and C.-L. Hwang, "The Development of Audit Detection Risk Assessment System: Using the Fuzzy Theory and Audit Risk Model," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1053-1067, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. G. T. Friedlob and L. F. Schleifer, "Fuzzy Logic: Application for Audit Risk and Uncertainty," Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 127-137, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. F. Hair , M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins and V. G. Kuppelwieser, "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research.," European Business Review, pp. 106-121, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. I. Ghozali, Structural Equation Model (SmartPLS) versi 3.0, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. M. Ringle, D. d. Silva and D. Bido, "Structural Equation Modeling with the SmartPLS," Brazilian Journal of Marketing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 56-73, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Impact of Understanding Audit Risk, Auditor's Competency, and Fuzzy Logic Analysis to Materiality Level Consideration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEME '22: Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
      July 2022
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450396394
      DOI:10.1145/3556089

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader