skip to main content
10.1145/3556089.3556114acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sustainability of Social Pension Enterprises: A Dynamic Cournot Duopoly Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Under the background of population aging, the market demand for elderly care has increased sharply. The elderly care services provided by traditional state-owned enterprises (SOEs) not only cannot meet the multi-level elderly care needs but also increase the financial burden of state-owned assets. Social enterprises can provide diversified and high-quality elderly care services to ensure economic and social value creation. Promoting the sustainable supply of social enterprises is a hot issue that must be solved in the current market-oriented transformation of elderly care services. To this end, we construct a dynamic Cournot duopoly model with bounded rational social pension enterprises. Furthermore, through theoretical analyses and numerical simulations, we find that social enterprises can increase output by increasing social investment and adjustment speed, but they need to control social investment within a suitable range. Our results provide theoretical significance for the sustainable development of social pension enterprises.

References

  1. Jiang T, He Z, Xiang G, and Hu T. 2021. The Impact of Government Subsidies on Private Pension Enterprises: A Decision-Making Model Based on Their CSR Levels. IEEE Access, 9: 167190-167203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Siebold N, Günzel-Jensen F and Müller S. 2018. Balancing dual missions for social venture growth: a comparative case study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(9-10): 710-734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chang T Y, Hu J and Wong H R. 2012. Dual-Value Driven Parallel Operating Systems and Interrelations of Resources in Social Enterprise. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(22): 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lee C M J, Che-Ha N and Alwi S F S. 2021. Service customer orientation and social sustainability: The case of small medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 122: 751-760.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Guo Z and Ma J. 2016. The Influence of Information Acquisition on the Complex Dynamics of Market Competition. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 26(01): 1650008-1650021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chen T, Pan J, He Y, and Wang J. 2020. Evolutionary Game Model of Integrating Health and Care Services for Elder People. Complexity, 2020: 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Zhang J, Da Q and Wang Y. 2007. RETRACTED: Analysis of nonlinear duopoly game with heterogeneous players. Economic Modelling, 24(1): 138-148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dubiel-Teleszynski T. 2011. Nonlinear dynamics in a heterogeneous duopoly game with adjusting players and diseconomies of scale. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 16(1): 296-308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fanti L, Gori L, Mammana C, and Michetti E. 2014. Local and global dynamics in a duopoly with price competition and market share delegation. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 69: 253-270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Zhu X, Zhu W and Yu L. 2014. Analysis of a nonlinear mixed Cournot game with boundedly rational players. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 59: 82-88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Elsadany A A. 2015. A dynamic Cournot duopoly model with different strategies. Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, 23(1): 56-61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Zhu Y, Zhou W, Chu T, and Elsadany A A. 2021. Complex dynamical behavior and numerical simulation of a Cournot-Bertrand duopoly game with heterogeneous players. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 101: 105898-105916.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ren J, Sun H, Xu G, and Hou D. 2020. Prediction on the competitive outcome of an enterprise under the adjustment mechanism. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gioffré A, Tampieri A and Villanacci A. 2021. Private versus public companies with strategic CSR. Journal of Economics, 133(2): 129-166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Elsadany A A and Awad A M. 2016. Nonlinear dynamics of Cournot duopoly game with social welfare. J Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis 4(2): 173-191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindh T. 2011. Social investment in the ageing populations of Europe. Towards a social investment welfare state, pp. 261-284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kvist J. 2014. A framework for social investment strategies: Integrating generational, life course and gender perspectives in the EU social investment strategy. Comparative European Politics, 13(1): 131-149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Brazzill M, Magara H and Yanai Y. 2021. When voters favour the social investment welfare state. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 21(4): 194-205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Sustainability of Social Pension Enterprises: A Dynamic Cournot Duopoly Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEME '22: Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
      July 2022
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450396394
      DOI:10.1145/3556089

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader