skip to main content
10.1145/3556089.3556136acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on inquiry letters and tax avoidance based on fixed effects model

Published:30 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The discussion on the regulatory inquiry mechanism has become increasingly in-depth in the theoretical and practical research fields under the background that China's regulatory authorities are committed to deepening the reform of the regulatory system in recent years. We attempt to have a deeper understanding of the connotation of information conveyed by inquiry letters through exploring the relationship between inquiry letters and corporate tax avoidance strategy. This article proposes hypotheses about the relationship of Chinese companies based on China's national conditions and market conditions, takes the inquiry letter issued by the stock exchange as the research object, and collects the data of China's listed companies from 2014 to 2020 to carry out empirical tests. The results show that there is a negative relationship between inquiry letters and tax avoidance in Chinese company especially in high-tech enterprises.

References

  1. ATWOOD T J, DRAKE M S, MYERS J N, 2012. Home country tax system characteristics and corporate tax avoidance: international evidence[J]. Accounting Review, 87(6) : 1831-1860.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Balakrishnan, K., Blouin, J. L., & Guay, W. R. (2018). Tax aggressiveness and corporate transparency. The Accounting Review, 94(1), 45-69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bozanic Z, Dietrich J R, Johnson B A. 2017. SEC comment letters and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(5) : 337-357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. BRADSHAW M, LIAO G, MA M. 2019. Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major shareholder[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67( 2/3) 255-277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassell C, Dreher L, Myers L. 2013. Reviewing the SEC's review process: 10-K comment letters and the cost of reme-diation. The Accounting Review, 88(6): 1875-1908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. CHEN S, CHEN X, CHENG Q, 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1) : 41-61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chen Yunsen, Deng Yilu, Li Zhe. 2018a. Does non-penalty regulation have information content? –Evidence based on inquiry letters. Journal of Financial Research(4) : 155-171 (In Chinese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Yunsen, Deng Yilu, Li Zhe. 2018b. Can non-administrative penalty supervision improve audit quality? –Evidence based on financial reporting inquiry letters. Journal of Audit Research(5) : 82-88 (In Chinese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Yunsen, Deng Yilu, Li Zhe. 2019. Effectiveness of front-line regulation of stock exchanges–Evidence from Financial reporting inquiry letters. Journal of Management World(3) : 169-185, 208 (In Chinese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DESAI M A, DHARMAPALA D. 2006. Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1) : 145-179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hasan, I., Wachtel, P. and Zhou, M., Institutional Development, Financial Deepening and Economic Growth: Evidence From China. Journal of Banking & Finance,Vol.33, No.1, 2009 , pp.157-170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Heese, J., M. Khan, K. Ramanna. 2017. Is the SEC Captured? Evidence from Comment-Letter Reviews. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64 (1) : 98-122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kim, J.; Li, Y. and Zhang, L. “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-Level Analysis. ”Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 100(3), pp. 639-662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. KOESTER A, SHEVLIN T, WANGERIN D. 2017. The role of managerial ability in corporate tax avoidance [J]. Management Science, 63(10) : 3147-3529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kubick T R, Lynch D, Mayberry M, 2016. The effects of regulatory scrutiny on tax avoidance: an examination of SEC comment letters. The Accounting Review, 91(6) : 1751-1780Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lanis, R., Richardson, G., 2012. Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: an empirical analysis. J. Account. Public Policy 31(1), 86-108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. McGuire, S.T., Wang, D., Wilson, R.J., 2014. Dual class ownership and tax avoidance. Account. Rev. 89(4), 1487-1516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wang, Q. 2016. Determinants of Segment Disclosure Deficiencies and the Effect of the SEC Comment Letter Process. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35 (2) : 109-133Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ye Kangtao, Liu Xing. Corporate Tax avoidance and internal agency costs [J]. Financial Research Journal, 2014, 000(009):158-176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang Junsheng, Tang Xiaojian, Li Guangzhong. 2018. Can precautionary regulation reduce the risk of price crashes? – Research based on exchange annual Report inquiry letters. Journal of Management Science, 10 : 112-116 (In Chinese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang Xinmin, Ge Chao, Yang Daoguang, LIU Nian. 2019. Tax avoidance, internal control and enterprise risk. Journal of Chinese Soft Science, 09:0108-11 (In Chinese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Research on inquiry letters and tax avoidance based on fixed effects model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEME '22: Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
      July 2022
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450396394
      DOI:10.1145/3556089

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader