skip to main content
10.1145/3556089.3556145acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The network analysis for AgriTech and FoodTech start-up and support organisations: Twitter analytic perspective in Thailand

Published:30 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, entrepreneurial ecosystem research has grown popular among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners. There have been many research attempts to investigate the gap in the entrepreneurial ecosystem between academics and practice. However, there still a lacks of research that provides an understanding of the interconnectedness and networking among entrepreneurial actors or supporting organisations, particularly in developing countries, for example, Thailand. In order to provide valuable opportunities to enhance and understand start-ups and support organisations networking in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, this paper applied social media analysis to demonstrate how social media data can be used to evaluate networks and explore interconnectedness. The research also helps to understand the relationship between AgriTech, FoodTech start-ups and support organisations in the entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Using Twints and the Twitter API, data were retrieved from Twitter's databases for start-ups, incubators or accelerators, and other support organisation information within the entrepreneurial ecosystem. The results indicate a lack of interconnections among AgriTech and FoodTech startups and support organisations in Thailand's ecosystem, such as incubators and accelerators. According to an analysis of social media, most start-up aid organisations in Thailand originated from local or national organisations, not global ones. These represent the fragility of Thai start-ups’ support organisations which lack a connection with international opportunities.

This research utilised social media analysis as an alternate evaluation approach for assessing the connection or network activity among local entrepreneurial actors. Furthermore, the evaluation findings can be used to identify the weak points in an ecosystem and suggest policies for growing and enhancing a start-up entrepreneurial ecosystem in developing nations such as Thailand.

References

  1. Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P. 1998. Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Business. Small Business Economics 10, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007997102930Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Zhao, C., & Burt, R. 2018. A Note on Business Survival and Social Network. Management and Organization Review, 14(2), 377-394. doi:10.1017/mor.2018.12Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Almotairy, B., Abdullah, M., Abbasi. R2020. The impact of social media adoption on the entrepreneurial ecosystem, Emerging Extended Reality Technologies for Industry 4.0: Early Experiences with Conception, Design, Implementation, Evaluation and Deployment 63. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119654674.ch5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Hannigan, T. R., Briggs, A. R., Valadao, R., Seidel, M.-D. L., Jennings, P. D. 2021. A new tool for policymakers: Mapping cultural possibilities in an emerging ai entrepreneurial ecosystem, Research Policy 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104315Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Singh, S., Chauhan, A. and Dhir, S. 2020. Analysing the start-up ecosystem of India: a Twitter analytics perspective, Journal of Advances in Management Research,17(2), 262-281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-08-2019-0164Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lakhiwal, A., Kar, A.K. 2016. Insights from Twitter Analytics: Modelling Social Media Personality Dimensions and Impact of Breakthrough Events. In: , et al. Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. I3E 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9844. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_47Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brown, R., Rocha, A., Mawson, S. 2021. Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 50(9), 104317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104317Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Motoyama, Y., Goetz, S., Han, Y. 2018. Where do entrepreneurs get information? An analysis of twitter-following patterns, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 30(3), 253-274, https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1435187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Martins, R.M., Park, E., Hain, D.S., Jurowetzki, R. 2021. Mapping entrepreneurial ecosystem for technology start-ups in developing economies: An empirical analysis of Twitter networks between start-ups and support organisations of Nairobi's digital economy, In: Daniels, C., Dosso, M., Amadi-Echendu, J. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Technology Commercialisation, and Innovation Policy in Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58240-1_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Stam, E. 2015. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique, European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Isenberg, D. 2011. The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, 1(781), 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Spigel, B. 2017. The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Brown, R., Mason, C.2017. Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus Econ 49, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Spigel, B., Harrison, R. 2018. Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Agricultural landscape in Thailand, Investment Bulletin (2020) 1–44. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from https://www.depa.or.th/storage/app/media/file/investment-bulletin.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Apipoonyanon, C., Szabo, S., Tsusaka, T. W., Leeson, K., Gunawan, E., & Kuwornu, J. K. 2021. Socio-economic and environmental barriers to increased agricultural production: New evidence from central Thailand. Outlook on Agriculture, 50(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020967361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Salaisook, P., Faysse, N., Tsusaka, T.W. 2020. Reasons for adoption of sustainable land management practices in a changing context: A mixed approach in Thailand, Land Use Policy, 96, 104676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Thailand board of investment report,2020, BOI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. The National statistical report, 2020, National statistical office, Thailand.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tanboonteck, S. 2020. Agritech and FoodTech Industry: Opportunities in Thailand, 1–37. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.boi.go.th/upload/content/AgritechFoodtech.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, E., Martins, R., Hain, D., Jurowetzki, R. 2017. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem for Technology Start-ups in Nairobi: Empirical analysis of Twitter networks of Start-ups and Support organisations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Purbasari, R., Wijaya, C., & Rahayu, N. 2020. Most roles actors play in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: A network theory perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 23(2), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Himelboim, I., Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Espina, C. 2017. Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis. Social Media + Society,3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEME '22: Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
    July 2022
    691 pages
    ISBN:9781450396394
    DOI:10.1145/3556089

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 30 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader