skip to main content
10.1145/3556564.3558234acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is wifi 802.11mc fine time measurement ready for prime-time localization?

Published:26 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

WiFi's fine time measurement (FTM) based ranging protocol has set the stage for mass adoption of location-aware applications and services in WiFi-pervading enterprise and consumer ecosystems. However, the lack of deployment of such commercial-scale localization solutions has motivated us to conduct a comprehensive experimental study that aims to verify whether WiFi's FTM is indeed ready for prime-time localization.

With heterogeneity in operation (devices, environments, and spectrum) being the fundamental essence of commercial deployments, our study focuses on FTM's ability to deliver useable localization under such practical conditions. Being a first of its kind, our study reveals several interesting insights for practical operation of FTM, with the most critical of them being its inability to eliminate substantial offsets in estimated ranges between heterogeneous devices and configurations that degrade performance significantly (up to 20 m error). Albeit a negative result for FTM's readiness, we also propose a simple but promising remedy - an over-the-top auto-calibration solution that allows every WiFi device, when it enters an enterprise environment, to self-calibrate its offsets on-demand, thereby salvaging FTM to render it useful (median error of 2 m) for localization.

References

  1. [Online]. Android Developer Guide. https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/connectivity/wifi-rttGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [Online]. Android WiFi RTT API. https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/connectivity/wifi-rttGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [Online]. ASUS RT-ACRH13 Router. https://www.asus.com/supportonly/RT-ACRH13/HelpDesk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [Online]. Compulab fitlet2. https://fit-iot.com/web/products/fitlet2/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [Online]. FTM patch for the Linux iw utility. https://goo.gl/TzJRGGGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [Online]. Google Nest WiFi. https://store.google.com/us/product/nest_wifi?hl=en-USGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [Online]. Google Pixel 5. https://www.gsmarena.com/google_pixel_5-10386.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [Online]. IEEE Standard for Information Technology - 802.11-2020. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.11/5536/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [Online]. Linksys Velop Intelligent Mesh WiFi System. https://www.linksys.com/us/whole-home-mesh-wifi/velop-intelligent-mesh-wifi-system-tri-band-ac2200/p/p-whw0301/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [Online]. Wi-Fi access points support the IEEE 802.11mc FTM RTT. https://people.csail.mit.edu/bkph/ftmrtt_issuesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [Online]. Wi-Fi Aware Android API. https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/connectivity/wifi-awareGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [Online]. Xiaomi Mi Note 10. https://www.mi.com/global/mi-note-10/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin Azizyan, Ionut Constandache, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2009. SurroundSense: Mobile Phone Localization via Ambience Fingerprinting. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Bahl and V.N. Padmanabhan. 2000. RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leor Banin, Ofer Bar-Shalom, Nir Dvorecki, and Yuval Amizur. 2019. Scalable Wi-Fi Client Self-Positioning Using Cooperative FTM-Sensors. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Daniel Camps-Mur, Eduard Garcia-Villegas, Elena Lopez-Aguilera, Paulo Loureiro, Paul Lambert, and Ali Raissinia. 2015. Enabling always on service discovery: Wifi neighbor awareness networking. IEEE Wireless Communications (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yifeng Cao, Ashutosh Dhekne, and Mostafa Ammar. 2021. ITrackU: Tracking a Pen-like Instrument via UWB-IMU Fusion. In Proc. of ACM MobiSys.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Changhao Chen, Stefano Rosa, Yishu Miao, Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Wei Wu, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2019. Selective Sensor Fusion for Neural Visual-Inertial Odometry. In Proc. of IEEE/CVF CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dongyao Chen, Kang G. Shin, Yurong Jiang, and Kyu-Han Kim. 2017. Locating and Tracking BLE Beacons with Smartphones. In Proc. of ACM CoNEXT.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Krishna Chintalapudi, Anand Padmanabha Iyer, and Venkata N. Padmanabhan. 2010. Indoor Localization without the Pain. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ashutosh Dhekne, Ayon Chakraborty, Karthikeyan Sundaresan, and Sampath Rangarajan. 2019. TrackIO: Tracking First Responders Inside-Out. In Proc. of USENIX NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zakieh S. Hashemifar, Charuvahan Adhivarahan, Anand Balakrishnan, and Karthik Dantu. 2019. Augmenting Visual SLAM with Wi-Fi Sensing for Indoor Applications. Auton. Robots (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohamed Ibrahim, Hansi Liu, Minitha Jawahar, Viet Nguyen, Marco Gruteser, Richard Howard, Bo Yu, and Fan Bai. 2018. Verification: Accuracy Evaluation of WiFi Fine Time Measurements on an Open Platform. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mohamed Ibrahim, Ali Rostami, Bo Yu, Hansi Liu, Minitha Jawahar, Viet Nguyen, Marco Gruteser, Fan Bai, and Richard Howard. 2020. Wi-Go: Accurate and Scalable Vehicle Positioning Using WiFi Fine Timing Measurement. In Proc. of ACM MobiSys.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Manikanta Kotaru, Kiran Joshi, Dinesh Bharadia, and Sachin Katti. 2015. SpotFi: Decimeter Level Localization Using WiFi. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hongbo Liu, Yu Gan, Jie Yang, Simon Sidhom, Yan Wang, Yingying Chen, and Fan Ye. 2012. Push the Limit of WiFi Based Localization for Smartphones. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rajalakshmi Nandakumar, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, and Venkata N. Padmanabhan. 2012. Centaur: Locating Devices in an Office Environment. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Daniel Neuhold, Christian Bettstetter, and Andreas F. Molisch. 2019. HiPR: High-Precision UWB Ranging for Sensor Networks. In Proc. of ACM MSWiM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pat Pannuto, Benjamin Kempke, Li-Xuan Chuo, David Blaauw, and Prabal Dutta. 2018. Harmonium: Ultra Wideband Pulse Generation with Bandstitched Recovery for Fast, Accurate, and Robust Indoor Localization. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Anshul Rai, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Venkata N. Padmanabhan, and Rijurekha Sen. 2012. Zee: Zero-Effort Crowdsourcing for Indoor Localization. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Maurizio Rea, Domenico Giustiniano, and Joerg Widmer. 2020. Virtual Inertial Sensors with Fine Time Measurements. In 2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Souvik Sen, Božidar Radunovic, Romit Roy Choudhury, and Tom Minka. 2012. You Are Facing the Mona Lisa: Spot Localization Using PHY Layer Information. In Proc. of ACM MobiSys.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wenhua Shao, Haiyong Luo, Fang Zhao, Hui Tian, Shuo Yan, and Antonino Crivello. 2020. Accurate Indoor Positioning Using Temporal-Spatial Constraints Based on Wi-Fi Fine Time Measurements. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Deepak Vasisht, Swarun Kumar, and Dina Katabi. 2016. Decimeter-Level Localization with a Single WiFi Access Point. In Proc. of USENIX NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. He Wang, Souvik Sen, Ahmed Elgohary, Moustafa Farid, Moustafa Youssef, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2012. No Need to War-Drive: Unsupervised Indoor Localization. In Proc. of MobiSys 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jie Xiong and Kyle Jamieson. 2013. ArrayTrack: A Fine-Grained Indoor Location System. In Proc. of USENIX NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yuan Zhuang, Jun Yang, You Li, Longning Qi, and Naser El-Sheimy. 2016. Smartphone-Based Indoor Localization with Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons. Sensors (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Is wifi 802.11mc fine time measurement ready for prime-time localization?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiNTECH '22: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation & CHaracterization
        October 2022
        89 pages
        ISBN:9781450395274
        DOI:10.1145/3556564

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WiNTECH '22 Paper Acceptance Rate11of15submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader