skip to main content
10.1145/3556564.3558240acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Empirical evaluation of short-range wifi vessel-to-shore overwater communications

Published:26 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Unmanned vehicles used in ocean science, defense operations and commercial activities collect large amounts of data that is further processed onshore. For real-time information exchange, the wireless link between the unmanned vehicle and onshore devices must be reliable. In this work, we empirically evaluate a WiFi link between an autonomous underwater vehicle on the surface and an onshore device under real-world conditions. This work allowed i) collecting a large-scale realistic dataset and ii) identifying major factors impairing communication in such scenarios. The TX-RX antenna alignment, the operation mode (manual vs automatic) and varying reflecting surface induced by AUV mobility lead to sudden changes (e.g. nulls) in the received signal strength that can be larger than 20 dB. This study provides useful insights to the design of robust vessel-to-shore short-range communications.

References

  1. Benedetto Allotta, Riccardo Costanzi, Francesco Fanelli, Niccolò Monni, Libero Paolucci, and Alessandro Ridolfi. 2017. Sea currents estimation during AUV navigation using Unscented Kalman Filter. IFAC World Congress 50, 1 (2017), 13668--13673.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Saad Biaz and Shaoen Wu. 2008. Rate adaptation algorithms for IEEE 802.11 networks: A survey and comparison. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. IEEE, Marrakech, Morocco, 130--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ghassan Dahman, Denis Couillard, Marie-Eve Grandmaison, Gwenael Poitau, and Francois Gagnon. 2019. Improved 2-Ray Model for Overwater Propagation Channels: Modeling the Instantaneous Variations in the Received Signal Strength. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 8, 3 (2019), 865--868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Riadh Essaadali, Ammar Kouki, Francois Gagnon, Denis Couillard, and Marie-Eve Grandmaison. 2015. Overwater point-to-multipoint radio pathloss characterization and modeling. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, 195--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. N. Fuke, K. Sugiyama, and H. Shinonaga. 2003. Long-range oversea wireless network using 2.4 GHz wireless LAN installation and performance. In Int. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks. IEEE, Dallas, USA, 351--356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Miguel Gutiérrez Gaitán, Pedro M Santos, Luis R Pinto, and Luís Almeida. 2020. Optimal antenna-height design for improved capacity on over-water radio links affected by tides. In Global OCEANS 2020: Singapore-US Gulf Coast. IEEE, Biloxi, MS, USA, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Miguel Gutiérrez Gaitán, Pedro M. d'Orey, Pedro M. Santos, Manuel Ribeiro, Luís Pinto, Luís Almeida, and J. Borges De Sousa. 2021. Wireless radio link design to improve near-shore communication with surface nodes on tidal waters. In IEEE OCEANS 2021. IEEE, San Diego, USA, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Miguel Gutiérrez Gaitán, Pedro M. Santos, Luis R. Pinto, and Luis Almeida. 2020. Experimental evaluation of the two-ray model for near-shore WiFi-based network systems design. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE, Antwerp, Belgium, 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Emir Cem Gezer, Lin Zhao, Jordan Beason, and Mingxi Zhou. 2021. Towards seafloor mapping using an affordable micro-UUV. In IEEE OCEANS. IEEE, San Diego, USA, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sanghai Guan, Jingjing Wang, Chunxiao Jiang, Ruiyang Duan, Yong Ren, and Tony Q. S. Quek. 2021. MagicNet: The Maritime Giant Cellular Network. IEEE Communications Magazine 59, 3 (2021), 117--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yiming Huo, Xiaodai Dong, and Scott Beatty. 2020. Cellular Communications in Ocean Waves for Maritime Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7, 10 (2020), 9965--9979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ruinan Li Li, Xiaolong Zheng, Yuting Wang, Liang Liu, and Huadong Ma. 2022. PolarScheduler: Dynamic Transmission Control for Floating LoRa Networks. In IEEE INFOCOM. IEEE, virtual, 550--559.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alex Macmillan, Mahesh K. Marina, and Jhair Tocancipa Triana. 2010. Slow Frequency Hopping for Mitigating Tidal Fading on Rural Long Distance Over-Water Wireless Links. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops. IEEE, San Diego, USA, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. David Pugh and Philip Woodworth. 2014. Sea-level science: understanding tides, surges, tsunamis and mean sea-level changes. Cambridge Uni. Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jean-Francois Quessy and François Éthier. 2012. Cramér-von Mises and characteristic function tests for the two and k-sample problems with dependent data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 56, 6 (2012), 2097--2111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jean-François Quessy and François Éthier. 2022. Coordinated Robotic Exploration of Dynamic Open Ocean Phenomena. Field Robotics 2 (2022), 843--871.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ehab Salahat, Ahmed Kulaib, Nazar Ali, and Raed Shubair. 2017. Exploring symmetry in wireless propagation channels. In European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC). IEEE, Oulu, Finland, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Devin P. Smith, Geoffrey G. Messier, and Michael W. Wasson. 2016. Boreal Forest Low Antenna Height Propagation Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 9 (2016), 4004--4011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Filipe B Teixeira, Tiago Oliveira, Mário Lopes, José Ruela, Rui Campos, and Manuel Ricardo. 2016. Tethered balloons and TV white spaces: A solution for real-time marine data transfer at remote ocean areas. In IEEE Third Underwater Communications and Networking Conference (UComms). IEEE, Lerici, Italy, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wei Wang, Gerald Hoerack, Thomas Jost, Ronald Raulefs, Michael Walter, and Uwe-Carsten Fiebig. 2015. Propagation channel at 5.2 GHz in Baltic sea with focus on scattering phenomena. In European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). IEEE, Lisbon, Portugal, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Khurram Shabih Zaidi, Varun Jeoti, Micheal Drieberg, Azlan Awang, and Asif Iqbal. 2018. Fading Characteristics in Evaporation Duct: Fade Margin for a Wireless Link in the South China Sea. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 11038--11045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Hongwei Zhang, Shitong Zhang, Yanhui Wang, Yuhong Liu, Yanan Yang, Tian Zhou, and Hongyu Bian. 2021. Subsea pipeline leak inspection by autonomous underwater vehicle. Applied Ocean Research 107 (2021), 102321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Empirical evaluation of short-range wifi vessel-to-shore overwater communications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiNTECH '22: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation & CHaracterization
        October 2022
        89 pages
        ISBN:9781450395274
        DOI:10.1145/3556564

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WiNTECH '22 Paper Acceptance Rate11of15submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader