skip to main content
10.1145/3556787.3556812acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswipsceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Designing a Research Approach to Investigate Computer Science Student Teachers’ Beliefs on AI in School

Published:31 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rising topic of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly popular in secondary schools. Due to the recent integration of AI into various school curricula, the topic is gaining more and more importance in Computer Science (CS) Education Research as well. However, prospective CS secondary school teachers hold pre-existing beliefs on AI in school and its relevance. These beliefs thus affect students’ beliefs in the future. In this context, this upcoming research project aims to find an applicable and comprehensive design approach to identify the explicit (i.e. conscious) and implicit (i.e. unconscious) CS student teachers’ beliefs on AI in secondary schools. As a long-term study, the first steps of the process of determining beliefs on AI are described, and ideas for the research design are elaborated.

References

  1. Alexander Best. 2020. Primary school teachers’ beliefs on computer science as a discipline and as a school subject. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Torsten Brinda and Michal Armoni (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3421590.3421659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Reinders Duit. 1995. Zur Rolle der konstruktivistischen Sichtweise in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Lehr- und Lernforschung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik41 (6) (1995), 905–923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Helenrose Fives and Michelle M. Buehl. 2012. Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us?In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors, Karen R. Harris, Steve Graham, Tim Urdan, Sandra Graham, James M. Royer, and Moshe Zeidner (Eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, 471–499.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gregor Große-Bölting and Andreas Mühling. 2020. Students Perception of the Inner Workings of Learning Machines. In 2020 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering. Ho-Chi-Minh-City, Vietnam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Vera Kirchner. 2016. Wirtschaftsunterricht aus der Sicht von Lehrpersonen. Eine qualitative Studie zu fachdidaktischen teachers‘ beliefs in der ökonomischen Bildung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10832-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Moritz Kreinsen and Sandra Schulz. 2021. Students’ Conceptions of Artificial Intelligence. In The 16th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Marc Berges, Andraes Mühling, and Michal Armoni (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3481312.3481328Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Annabel Lindner and Marc-Pascal Berges. 2020. Can you explain AI to me? Teachers’ pre-concepts about Artificial Intelligence. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, Uppsala, SE, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Annabel Lindner, Marc-Pascal Berges, and Magdalena Lechner. 2021. KI im Toaster? Schüler:innenvorstellungen zu künstlicher Intelligenz. In Informatik - Bildung von Lehrkräften in allen Phasen. 19. GI-Fachtagung Informatik und Schule, Ludger Humbert (Ed.). Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn, 133–142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Annabel Lindner and Ralf Romeike. 2019. Teachers’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence. In ISSEP 2019 - 12th International conference on informatics in schools: Situation, evaluation and perspectives, Local Proceedings, Eglė Jasutėand Sergei Pozdniakov (Eds.). Larnaca, CY, 22–29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nasser Mansour. 2013. Consistencies and Inconsistencies Between Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. International Journal of Science Education 35, 7 (2013), 1230–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.743196Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ministerium für Schule und Bildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. 2021. Kernlehrplanfür die Sekundarstufe I - Klasse 5 und 6 in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Informatik.Retrieved July 14, 2022 from https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/lehrplan/260/si_kl5u6_if_klp_2021_07_01.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stuart J. Russell and Peter Norvig. 2021. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach(fourth edition, global edition ed.). Pearson, Harlow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ilkka Tuomi. 2018. The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandra L. Woolley, Woan-Jue J. Benjamin, and Anita Williams Woolley. 2004. Construct Validity of a Self-Report Measure of Teacher Beliefs Related to Constructivist and Traditional Approaches to Teaching and Learning. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64, 2 (2004), 319–331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing a Research Approach to Investigate Computer Science Student Teachers’ Beliefs on AI in School

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WiPSCE '22: Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
        October 2022
        130 pages
        ISBN:9781450398534
        DOI:10.1145/3556787

        Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 October 2022

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        WiPSCE '22 Paper Acceptance Rate14of41submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate104of279submissions,37%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)116
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format