skip to main content
research-article

The Influence of Personality Traits on User Interaction with Recommendation Interfaces

Published: 10 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Users’ personality traits can take an active role in affecting their behavior when they interact with a computer interface. However, in the area of recommender systems (RS), though personality-based RS has been extensively studied, most works focus on algorithm design, with little attention paid to studying whether and how the personality may influence users’ interaction with the recommendation interface. In this manuscript, we report the results of a user study (with 108 participants) that not only measured the influence of users’ personality traits on their perception and performance when using the recommendation interface but also employed an eye-tracker to in-depth reveal how personality may influence users’ eye-movement behavior. Moreover, being different from related work that has mainly been conducted in a single product domain, our user study was performed in three typical application domains (i.e., electronics like smartphones, entertainment like movies, and tourism like hotels). Our results show that mainly three personality traits, i.e., Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness, significantly influence users’ perception and eye-movement behavior, but the exact influences vary across the domains. Finally, we provide a set of guidelines that might be constructive for designing a more effective recommendation interface based on user personality.

References

[2]
Icek Ajzen. 2005. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. McGraw−Hill Education (UK).
[3]
Hosam Al-Samarraie, Atef Eldenfria, and Husameddin Dawoud. 2017. The impact of personality traits on users information-seeking behavior. Information Processing & Management 53, 1 (2017), 237–247.
[4]
L. Arockiam and J. Selvaraj. 2013. User interface design for effective e-learning based on personality traits. International Journal of Computer Applications 61 (2013), 28–32.
[5]
Nathaniel J. S. Ashby, Joseph G. Johnson, Ian Krajbich, and Michel Wedel. 2016. Applications and innovations of eye-movement research in judgment and decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 29, 2–3 (2016), 96–102. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bdm.1956
[6]
Zahra Ashktorab, Mohit Jain, Q. Vera Liao, and Justin D. Weisz. 2019. Resilient chatbots: Repair strategy preferences for conversational breakdowns. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[7]
Nigel Nicholson Corresponding author, Emma Soane, Mark Fenton-O’Creevy, and Paul Willman. 2005. Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research 8, 2 (2005), 157–176.
[8]
Adrien Baranes, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, and Jacqueline Gottlieb. 2015. Eye movements reveal epistemic curiosity in human observers. Vision Research 117, 1 (2015), 81–90.
[9]
Yoav Benjamini and Yosef Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57, 1 (1995), 289–300.
[10]
Shlomo Berkovsky, Ronnie Taib, Irena Koprinska, Eileen Wang, Yucheng Zeng, Jingjie Li, and Sabina Kleitman. 2019. Detecting personality traits using eye-tracking data. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–12.
[11]
Magdalena Borys and Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik. 2017. Eye-tracking metrics in perception and visual attention research. EJMT 3 (2017), 11–23.
[12]
Michael D. Byrne, John R. Anderson, Scott Douglass, and Michael Matessa. 1999. Eye tracking the visual search of click-down menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 402–409.
[13]
Iván Cantador, Ignacio Fernández-tobías, and Alejandro Bellogín. 2013. Relating personality types with user preferences in multiple entertainment domains. EMPIRE 1st Workshop on “Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services”, 10. June 2013, Rome (2013).
[14]
Gary Charness, Uri Gneezy, and Michael A. Kuhn. 2012. Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 81, 1 (2012), 1–8.
[15]
Pyk Chau, M. Cole, A. P. Massey, M. Montoya-Weiss, and R. M. O’Keefe. 2002. Cultural differences in the online behavior of consumers. Communications of the ACM 45, 10 (2002), 138–143.
[16]
Fang Chen, Natalie Ruiz, Eric Choi, Julien Epps, M. Asif Khawaja, Ronnie Taib, Bo Yin, and Yang Wang. 2013. Multimodal behavior and interaction as indicators of cognitive load. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 4 (2013), 1–36.
[17]
Li Chen. 2010. Towards three-stage recommender support for online consumers: Implications from a user study. In International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Springer, 365–375.
[18]
Li Chen, Wanling Cai, Dongning Yan, and Shlomo Berkovsky. 2022. Eye-tracking-based personality prediction with recommendation interfaces. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2022).
[19]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2010. Experiments on the preference-based organization interface in recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 17, 1 (April2010), 1–33.
[20]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2010. Eye-tracking study of user behavior in recommender interfaces. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 375–380.
[21]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2011. Users’ eye gaze pattern in organization-based recommender interfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 311–314.
[22]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2014. Experiments on user experiences with recommender interfaces. Behaviour & Information Technology 33, 4 (2014), 372–394.
[23]
Li Chen and Feng Wang. 2017. Explaining recommendations based on feature sentiments in product reviews. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 17–28.
[24]
Li Chen, Wen Wu, and Liang He. 2013. How personality influences users’ needs for recommendation diversity?. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 829–834.
[25]
Li Chen, Dongning Yan, and Feng Wang. 2019. User evaluations on sentiment-based recommendation explanations. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 9, 4 (2019), 1–38.
[26]
Li Chen, Yonghua Yang, Ningxia Wang, Keping Yang, and Quan Yuan. 2019. How serendipity improves user satisfaction with recommendations? A large-scale user evaluation. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 240–250.
[27]
Jacob Cohen. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 11, 1 (1992), 155–159.
[28]
Paul T. Costa and Robert R. McCrae. 1992. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment 4, 1 (1992), 5–13.
[29]
Paul T. Costa Jr. and Robert R. McCrae. 2008. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R).Sage Publications, Inc.
[30]
Susan T. Dumais, Georg Buscher, and Edward Cutrell. 2010. Individual differences in gaze patterns for web search. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context. 185–194.
[31]
Claudia Ehmke and Stephanie Wilson. 2007. Identifying web usability problems from eye-tracking data. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers. British Computer Society, 119–128.
[32]
Mehdi Elahi, Matthias Braunhofer, Francesco Ricci, and Marko Tkalcic. 2013. Personality-based active learning for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 360–371.
[33]
Vinícius Basseto Félix and André Felipe Berdusco Menezes. 2018. Comparisons of ten corrections methods for t-test in multiple comparisons via Monte Carlo study. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis 11, 1 (2018), 74–91.
[34]
Ignacio Fernández-Tobías, Matthias Braunhofer, Mehdi Elahi, Francesco Ricci, and Iván Cantador. 2016. Alleviating the new user problem in collaborative filtering by exploiting personality information. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 26, 2–3 (2016), 221–255.
[35]
Bruce Ferwerda, Mark P. Graus, Andreu Vall, Marko Tkalcic, and Markus Schedl. 2016. The influence of users’ personality traits on satisfaction and attractiveness of diversified recommendation lists. In EMPIRE@ RecSys. 43–47.
[36]
Andy Field. 2013. Discovering Statistics using SPSS. Sage.
[37]
Ana M. Franco-Watkins and Joseph G. Johnson. 2011. Decision moving window: Using interactive eye tracking to examine decision processes. Behavior Research Methods 43, 853 (2011), 329–358.
[38]
M. G. Glaholt and E. M. Reingold. 2011. Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 4, 2 (2011), 125–146.
[39]
Lewis R. Goldberg. 1990. An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 6 (1990), 1216–1229.
[40]
Ulrike Gretzel, Nicole Mitsche, Yeong-Hyeon Hwang, and Daniel R. Fesenmaier. 2004. Tell me who you are and I will tell you where to go: Use of travel personalities in destination recommendation systems. Information Technology & Tourism 7, 1 (2004), 3–12.
[41]
C. Keith Haddock, David Rindskopf, and William R. Shadish. 1998. Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-analysis of dichotomous data: A primer on methods and issues. Psychological Methods 3, 3 (1998), 339.
[42]
Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2010. A study on user perception of personality-based recommender systems. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 291–302.
[43]
Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2011. Enhancing recommendation diversity with organization interfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 347–350.
[44]
Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2013. Exploring relations between personality and user rating behaviors. In UMAP Workshops. 1–12.
[45]
Dawn Iacobucci, Steven S. Posavac, Frank R. Kardes, Matthew J . Schneider, and Deidre L. Popovich. 2015. Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. Journal of Consumer Psychology 25, 4 (2015), 652–665.
[46]
Dietmar Jannach, Mathias Jesse, Michael Jugovac, and Christoph Trattner. 2021. Exploring Multi-List User Interfaces for Similar-Item Recommendations. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 224–228.
[47]
Dietmar Jannach, Ahtsham Manzoor, Wanling Cai, and Li Chen. 2021. A survey on conversational recommender systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 5, Article 105 (May2021), 36 pages.
[48]
Oliver P. John and Sanjay Srivastava. 1999. The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. University of California Berkeley.
[49]
Michael Jugovac, Ingrid Nunes, and Dietmar Jannach. 2018. Investigating the decision-making behavior of maximizers and satisficers in the presence of recommendations. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 279–283.
[50]
Raghav Pavan Karumur, Tien T. Nguyen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2018. Personality, user preferences and behavior in recommender systems. Information Systems Frontiers 20, 6 (2018), 1241–1265.
[51]
Elizabeth G. Kehoe, John M. Toomey, Joshua H. Balsters, and Arun L. W. Bokde. 2012. Personality modulates the effects of emotional arousal and valence on brain activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7, 7 (2012), 858–870.
[52]
V. Kostov and S. Fukuda. 2001. Development of man-machine interfaces based on user preferences. In Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA’01) (Cat. No.01CH37204). 1124–1128.
[53]
Pigi Kouki, James Schaffer, Jay Pujara, John O’Donovan, and Lise Getoor. 2019. Personalized explanations for hybrid recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 379–390.
[54]
Jie Lu, Dianshuang Wu, Mingsong Mao, Wei Wang, and Guangquan Zhang. 2015. Recommender system application developments: A survey. Decision Support Systems 74, 1 (2015), 12–32.
[55]
Valentina Maccatrozzo, Manon Terstall, Lora Aroyo, and Guus Schreiber. 2017. SIRUP: Serendipity in recommendations via user perceptions. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35–44.
[56]
I. Scott MacKenzie. 2013. Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
[57]
Sandy Manolios, Alan Hanjalic, and Cynthia C. S. Liem. 2019. The influence of personal values on music taste. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 501–505.
[58]
Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa Jr. 1997. Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In Handbook of Personality Psychology. Elsevier, 825–847.
[59]
Robert R. McCrae and Oliver P. John. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality 60, 2 (1992), p175–215.
[60]
Sean M. McNee, Shyong K. Lam, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2003. Interfaces for eliciting new user preferences in recommender systems. In User Modeling 2003, Peter Brusilovsky, Albert Corbett, and Fiorella de Rosis (Eds.). Springer Berlin, Berlin, 178–187.
[61]
Claudia Mello-Thoms, Calvin F. Nodine, and Harold L. Kundel. 2002. What attracts the eye to the location of missed and reported breast cancers? In Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. 111–117.
[62]
Takashi Mitsuda and Mackenzie G. Glaholt. 2014. Gaze bias during visual preference judgements: Effects of stimulus category and decision instructions. Visual Cognition 22, 1 (2014), 11–29.
[63]
Tien T. Nguyen, F. Maxwell Harper, Loren Terveen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2018. User personality and user satisfaction with recommender systems. Information Systems Frontiers 20, 6 (2018), 1173–1189.
[64]
Stephen Olejnik and James Algina. 2003. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods 8, 4 (2003), 434.
[65]
Thorsten Pachur and Melanie Spaar. 2015. Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 4, 3 (2015), 303–311.
[66]
Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Christoph Trattner. 2014. See what you want to see: Visual user-driven approach for hybrid recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 235–240.
[67]
Alex Poole and Linden J. Ball. 2005. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Current status and future. In Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, Claude Ghaoui (Ed.). Idea Group, Inc., Pennsylvania, 211–219.
[68]
Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2006. Trust building with explanation interfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’06). ACM, NY, USA, 93–100.
[69]
Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2007. Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 20, 6 (Aug.2007), 542–556.
[70]
Alison Purvis, Ryan T. Howell, and Ravi Iyer. 2011. Exploring the role of personality in the relationship between maximization and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences 50, 3 (2011), 370–375.
[71]
George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris. 2017. On implicit elicitation of cognitive strategies using gaze transition entropies in pattern recognition tasks. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1993–2000.
[72]
John F. Rauthmann, Christian T. Seubert, Pierre Sachse, and Marco R. Furtner. 2012. Eyes as windows to the soul: Gazing behavior is related to personality. Journal of Research in Personality 46, 2 (2012), 147–156.
[73]
Keith Rayner. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124, 3 (1998), 372–422.
[74]
Peter Rentfrow and Samuel Gosling. 2003. The Do Re Mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 6 (2003), 1236–1256.
[75]
Muhammad Naveed Riaz, Muhammad Akram Riaz, and Naila Batool. 2012. Personality types as predictors of decision making styles. Journal of Behavioural Sciences 22, 2 (2012), 99–114.
[76]
Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2011. Introduction to recommender systems handbook. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 1–35.
[77]
Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2015. Recommender Systems Handbook (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
[78]
Nan Song Feng Du Kan Zhang Richard Carciofo, Jiaoyan Yang. 2016. Psychometric evaluation of Chinese-language 44-item and 10-item Big Five personality inventories, including correlations with chronotype, mindfulness and mind wandering. PLoS ONE 11, 2 (2016).
[79]
Evan F. Risko, Nicola C. Anderson, Sophie Lanthier, and Alan Kingstone. 2012. Curious eyes: Individual differences in personality predict eye movement behavior in scene-viewing. Cognition 122, 1 (2012), 86–90.
[80]
Rasoul Sadi, Hassan Ghalibaf Asl, Mohammad Reza Rostami, Aryan Gholipour, and Fattaneh Gholipour. 2011. Behavioral finance: The explanation of investors personality and perceptual biases effects on financial decisions. International Journal of Economics and Finance 3, 5 (2011), 234–241.
[81]
Dario D. Salvucci and Joseph H. Goldberg. 2000. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA’00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71–78.
[82]
Samer Muthana Sarsam and Hosam Al-Samarraie. 2018. Towards incorporating personality into the design of an interface: A method for facilitating users’ interaction with the display. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 28, 1 (March2018), 75–96.
[83]
Barry Schwartz, Andrew Ward, John Monterosso, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Katherine White, and Darrin R. Lehman. 2002. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 5 (2002), 1178–1197.
[84]
Alain Starke, Edis Asotic, and Christoph Trattner. 2021. “Serving Each User”: Supporting Different Eating Goals Through a Multi-List Recommender Interface. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 124–132.
[85]
Neil Stewart, Frouke Hermens, and William J. Matthews. 2016. Eye movements in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 29, 2–3 (2016), 116–136. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/pdf/10.1002/bdm.1854
[86]
Joachim Stoeber, Kathleen Otto, and Claudia Dalbert. 2009. Perfectionism and the Big Five: Conscientiousness predicts longitudinal increases in self-oriented perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences 47, 4 (2009), 363–368.
[87]
Nava Tintarev, Matt Dennis, and Judith Masthoff. 2013. Adapting recommendation diversity to openness to experience: A study of human behaviour. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 190–202.
[88]
Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2008. Over-and underestimation in different product domains. In Workshop on Recommender Systems Associated with ECAI. 14–19.
[89]
Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2012. Evaluating the effectiveness of explanations for recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4-5 (2012), 399–439.
[90]
Marko Tkalcic and Li Chen. 2015. Personality and recommender systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook, Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). Springer, 715–739. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/reference/sp/rsh2015.html#TkalcicC15.
[91]
Marko Tkalcic, Matevz Kunaver, Jurij Tasic, and Andrej Košir. 2009. Personality based user similarity measure for a collaborative recommender system. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction-Real World Challenges. 30–37.
[92]
Marko Tkalčič, Daniele Quercia, and Sabine Graf. 2016. Preface to the special issue on personality in personalized systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 26, 2–3 (2016), 103–107.
[93]
Chun-Hua Tsai and Peter Brusilovsky. 2017. Enhancing recommendation diversity through a dual recommendation interface. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1884. 10–15.
[94]
Sonja Utz, Peter Kerkhof, and Joost Van Den Bos. 2012. Consumers rule: How consumer reviews influence perceived trustworthiness of online stores. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11, 1 (2012), 49–58.
[95]
Anne-Kathrin Wilbers, Alina Vennekoetter, Moritz Kacauster, Kai-Christoph Hamborg, and Kai Kaspar. 2015. Personality traits and eye movements: An eye-tracking and pupillometry study. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Eye Movement. 268.
[96]
Alan Wong and Bernardo Carducci. 2013. Does personality affect personal financial risk tolerance behavior? IUP Journal of Applied Finance 19, 3 (2013), 5–18.
[97]
Wen Wu and Li Chen. 2015. Implicit acquisition of user personality for augmenting movie recommendations. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 302–314.
[98]
Wen Wu, Li Chen, and Yu Zhao. 2018. Personalizing recommendation diversity based on user personality. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 28, 3 (2018), 237–276.
[99]
Carolina Xavier. 2019. NEURAL: Towards Neuroticicism-Based User Interface Customization. Master’s Thesis. Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa.
[100]
Toshio Yamagishi. 2001. Trust as a form of social intelligence. In Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust, Vol. 2. Trust in Society. Russell Sage Foundation, 121–147.
[101]
Pengfei Zhao and Dik Lun Lee. 2016. How Much Novelty Is Relevant?: It Depends on Your Curiosity. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR’16. ACM Press, 315–324.
[102]
Caroline Ziemkiewicz, R. J. Crouser, Ashley Rye Yauilla, S. Su, W. Ribarsky, and R. Chang. 2011. How locus of control influences compatibility with visualization style. 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST) (2011), 81–90.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring people's perceptions of LLM-generated adviceComputers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans10.1016/j.chbah.2024.1000722:2(100072)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2023)Machine Learning for Predicting Personality Traits from Eye Tracking2023 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)10.1109/DASA59624.2023.10286789(126-130)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2023

Index Terms

  1. The Influence of Personality Traits on User Interaction with Recommendation Interfaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
      ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 13, Issue 1
      March 2023
      171 pages
      ISSN:2160-6455
      EISSN:2160-6463
      DOI:10.1145/3584868
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 10 March 2023
      Online AM: 24 August 2022
      Accepted: 18 July 2022
      Revised: 08 February 2022
      Received: 03 September 2021
      Published in TIIS Volume 13, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Recommendation interface
      2. eye-tracking experiment
      3. user personality

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Hong Kong Research Grants Council
      • Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)279
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Exploring people's perceptions of LLM-generated adviceComputers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans10.1016/j.chbah.2024.1000722:2(100072)Online publication date: Aug-2024
      • (2023)Machine Learning for Predicting Personality Traits from Eye Tracking2023 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)10.1109/DASA59624.2023.10286789(126-130)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2023

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media