research-article

Distributed Mimic Judgment Algorithm based on Multi-Strategy Decentralization Model

Authors:

Yu Song,

He Sun,

Jiaxing Wang,

Wenhe Liu,

Jianhui ZhangAuthors Info & Claims

ICCSIE '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cyber Security and Information Engineering

Pages 598 - 603

https://doi.org/10.1145/3558819.3565150

Published: 26 October 2022 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

The current mimic adjudication model is centered on a single adjudicator, and the adjudication algorithm is relatively single and static, which cannot cope with today's complex and changeable network environment. First, a distributed adjudication model is proposed to decentralize the adjudicator, each sub-arbiter is different from the previous use of all executive results, but randomly selects the output of the executive as the input incentive. Secondly, based on this model, a consensus mechanism algorithm is proposed to iteratively normalize the local adjudication results of the sub-arbiters to achieve the global optimal adjudication result. The analysis of the simulation experiment results shows that the algorithm proposed in this paper is more accurate than the traditional adjudication algorithm when multiple executors are online. The algorithm can further reduce the risk of common-mode escape and improve the security of the mimic defense system.

References

[1]

WU Jiangxing.Research on Cyber Mimic Defense[J].Journal of Cyber Security,2016,1(4) :1-10.

Google Scholar

[2]

Vihinen, Mauno. Majority vote and other problems when using computational tools [J]. Human Mutation, 2014, 35 (8): 912-914.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

Ouyang Chengtian, Wang Xi, Zheng Jian. Adaptive unanimous voting algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38 (7): 130-133.

Google Scholar

[4]

WEI Shuai,ZHANG Huihua,SU Ye,et al.Majority Voting Algorithm and Performance Analysis based on High level Heterogeneity[J].

Google Scholar

[5]

LI Jun, WANG Zhihao, CHEN Yingchun. An Intelligent Adjudication Algorithm based on Security of Executors [J]. Communications Technology,2021,54(4):929-937.

Google Scholar

[6]

Shen Congqi, Chen Shuang xi, Wu Chun ming. Research on adaptive mimic controller based on reputation and dissimilarity [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 039 (z2): 173-180.

Google Scholar

[7]

Wu Zhaoqi, Zhang Fan, Guo Wei, A mimic ruling optimization method based on the isomerism of the executive body [J]. Computer Engineering, 2020, 46 (5): 12-18.

Google Scholar

[8]

C. Shen, S.-X. Chen, C.-M. Wu, A decentralized multi-ruling arbiter for cyberspace mimicry defense, in: 2019 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[9]

PULiming, BOYi,YOUWei,etal.Heterogeneous Executors Output Decision Method for Mimic Cloud Service[J].Journal of Information Engineering University,2020,21(3):344-351.

Google Scholar

[10]

MA H L, YI P, JIANG Y M, Dynamic heterogeneous redundancybased router architecture with mimic defenses[J]. Journal of CyberSecurity, 2017, 2(1): 29-42.

Google Scholar

[11]

TONG Q, ZHANG Z, ZHANG W H, Design and implementation of mimic defense Web server[J]. Journal of Software, 2017, 28(4):883-897.

Google Scholar

[12]

Nan Zhao,Jingjing Bao,Nan Chen,Hongshu Chen. Ranking Influential Nodes in Complex Networks with Information Entropy Method[J]. Complexity, 2020,2020.

Google Scholar

Index Terms

Distributed Mimic Judgment Algorithm based on Multi-Strategy Decentralization Model
1. Theory of computation
  1. Design and analysis of algorithms

Recommendations

Multi-party Dialogue Games for Distributed Argumentation System
WI-IAT '11: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02

This paper concerns a distributed argumentation system where different agents are equipped with argumentative knowledge base (henceforth referred as KB) within which conflict arguments are represented using attacking relations. This paper proposes the ...
Collective argument evaluation as judgement aggregation
AAMAS '10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1

A conflicting knowledge base can be seen abstractly as a set of arguments and a binary relation characterising conflict among them. There may be multiple plausible ways to evaluate conflicting arguments. In this paper, we ask: given a set of agents, ...
Majority Judgment vs. Approval Voting
The two main criticisms by approval voting (AV) supporters have been that majority judgment (MJ) is not “Condorcet” and that it admits the no-show paradox. That MJ is not Condorcet consistent is a good property shared with AV: the domination paradox shows ...
Majority judgment (MJ) and approval voting (AV) are compared in theory and practice. Criticisms of MJ and claims that AV is superior are refuted. The two primary criticisms have been that MJ is not “Condorcet consistent” and that it admits the “no-show ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ICCSIE '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cyber Security and Information Engineering

September 2022

1094 pages

ISBN:9781450397414

DOI:10.1145/3558819

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

ICCSIE2022

ICCSIE2022: 7th International Conference on Cyber Security and Information Engineering

September 23 - 25, 2022

QLD, Brisbane, Australia

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

0
Total Citations
24
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)5
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Abstract

References

Index Terms

Recommendations

Multi-party Dialogue Games for Distributed Argumentation System

Collective argument evaluation as judgement aggregation

Majority Judgment vs. Approval Voting

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

eReader

HTML Format

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations