Yu Song
ABSTRACT
The current mimic adjudication model is centered on a single adjudicator, and the adjudication algorithm is relatively single and static, which cannot cope with today's complex and changeable network environment. First, a distributed adjudication model is proposed to decentralize the adjudicator, each sub-arbiter is different from the previous use of all executive results, but randomly selects the output of the executive as the input incentive. Secondly, based on this model, a consensus mechanism algorithm is proposed to iteratively normalize the local adjudication results of the sub-arbiters to achieve the global optimal adjudication result. The analysis of the simulation experiment results shows that the algorithm proposed in this paper is more accurate than the traditional adjudication algorithm when multiple executors are online. The algorithm can further reduce the risk of common-mode escape and improve the security of the mimic defense system.
- WU Jiangxing.Research on Cyber Mimic Defense[J].Journal of Cyber Security,2016,1(4) :1-10.Google Scholar
- Vihinen, Mauno. Majority vote and other problems when using computational tools [J]. Human Mutation, 2014, 35 (8): 912-914.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ouyang Chengtian, Wang Xi, Zheng Jian. Adaptive unanimous voting algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38 (7): 130-133.Google Scholar
- WEI Shuai,ZHANG Huihua,SU Ye,et al.Majority Voting Algorithm and Performance Analysis based on High level Heterogeneity[J].Google Scholar
- LI Jun, WANG Zhihao, CHEN Yingchun. An Intelligent Adjudication Algorithm based on Security of Executors [J]. Communications Technology,2021,54(4):929-937.Google Scholar
- Shen Congqi, Chen Shuang xi, Wu Chun ming. Research on adaptive mimic controller based on reputation and dissimilarity [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 039 (z2): 173-180.Google Scholar
- Wu Zhaoqi, Zhang Fan, Guo Wei, A mimic ruling optimization method based on the isomerism of the executive body [J]. Computer Engineering, 2020, 46 (5): 12-18.Google Scholar
- C. Shen, S.-X. Chen, C.-M. Wu, A decentralized multi-ruling arbiter for cyberspace mimicry defense, in: 2019 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- PULiming, BOYi,YOUWei,etal.Heterogeneous Executors Output Decision Method for Mimic Cloud Service[J].Journal of Information Engineering University,2020,21(3):344-351.Google Scholar
- MA H L, YI P, JIANG Y M, Dynamic heterogeneous redundancybased router architecture with mimic defenses[J]. Journal of CyberSecurity, 2017, 2(1): 29-42.Google Scholar
- TONG Q, ZHANG Z, ZHANG W H, Design and implementation of mimic defense Web server[J]. Journal of Software, 2017, 28(4):883-897.Google Scholar
- Nan Zhao,Jingjing Bao,Nan Chen,Hongshu Chen. Ranking Influential Nodes in Complex Networks with Information Entropy Method[J]. Complexity, 2020,2020.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Distributed Mimic Judgment Algorithm based on Multi-Strategy Decentralization Model
Recommendations
Multi-party Dialogue Games for Distributed Argumentation System
WI-IAT '11: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02This paper concerns a distributed argumentation system where different agents are equipped with argumentative knowledge base (henceforth referred as KB) within which conflict arguments are represented using attacking relations. This paper proposes the ...
Collective argument evaluation as judgement aggregation
AAMAS '10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1A conflicting knowledge base can be seen abstractly as a set of arguments and a binary relation characterising conflict among them. There may be multiple plausible ways to evaluate conflicting arguments. In this paper, we ask: given a set of agents, ...
Majority Judgment vs. Approval Voting
The two main criticisms by approval voting (AV) supporters have been that majority judgment (MJ) is not “Condorcet” and that it admits the no-show paradox. That MJ is not Condorcet consistent is a good property shared with AV: the domination paradox shows ...
Majority judgment (MJ) and approval voting (AV) are compared in theory and practice. Criticisms of MJ and claims that AV is superior are refuted. The two primary criticisms have been that MJ is not “Condorcet consistent” and that it admits the “no-show ...
Comments