skip to main content
10.1145/3559400.3562002acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DancingPottery: Posture-Driven Pottery Generative Design and Fabrication

Published: 26 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

We present a method of designing and fabricating pottery artwork through human posture where the users need neither professional skills nor experience with 3D modeling software. This method creatively solves the problem of mapping between the human skeleton and the pottery shape and has a strong ability to model complex shapes while being user-friendly. Our system represents the deformation of a pottery object with four independent operators and provides real-time visual feedback as the user changes their posture. Unlike traditional pottery throwing, where the product has high symmetry, our system supports modeling asymmetric pottery shapes. After obtaining the model, the model can be fabricated directly via ceramic 3D printing, as the models satisfy printability constraints. A user study showed that the designed mapping relationship supports pottery shape deformation with a high degree-of-freedom, and inexperienced users can easily use the system with minimal instruction.

References

[1]
John Bastian, Ben Ward, Rhys Hill, Anton van den Hengel, and Anthony Dick. 2010. Interactive modelling for AR applications. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643570
[2]
Paul Borrel and Ari Rappoport. 1994. Simple Constrained Deformations for Geometric Modeling and Interactive Design. ACM Trans. Graph. 13, 2 (April 1994), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1145/176579.176581
[3]
Z. Cao, G. Hidalgo Martinez, T. Simon, S. Wei, and Y. A. Sheikh. 2019. OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2019).
[4]
Alexis Clay, Jean-Christophe Lombardo, Julien Conan, and Nadine Couture. 2013. Towards Bi-Manual 3D Painting: Generating Virtual Shapes with Hands. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Los Angeles, California, USA) (SUI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491367.2491396
[5]
Mustafa Doga Dogan, Faraz Faruqi, Andrew Day Churchill, Kenneth Friedman, Leon Cheng, Sriram Subramanian, and Stefanie Mueller. 2020. G-ID: Identifying 3D Prints Using Slicing Parameters. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376202
[6]
Tinsley A. Galyean and John F. Hughes. 1991. Sculpting: An Interactive Volumetric Modeling Technique. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques(SIGGRAPH ’91). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/122718.122747
[7]
Google. 2019. Google Morphing Clay. https://futuredeluxe.com/work/google.
[8]
Melody Horn, Amy Traylor, and Leah Buechley. 2022. Slabforge: Design Software for Slab-Based Ceramics. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 48, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517663
[9]
R.D. Hurrion. 1986. Visual interactive modelling. European Journal of Operational Research 23, 3 (1986), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90293-6
[10]
T. Igarashi, S. Matsuoka, and H. Tanaka. 2007. Teddy: a sketching interface for 3D freeform design, in: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 courses. ACM (01 2007).
[11]
Alec Jacobson, Daniele Panozzo, 2018. libigl: A simple C++ geometry processing library. https://libigl.github.io/.
[12]
J. Jankowski and M. Hachet. 2013. A Survey of Interaction Techniques for Interactive 3D Environments. Autonomic & Autacoid Pharmacology(2013).
[13]
Michael D. Jones, Kevin Seppi, and Dan R. Olsen. 2016. What You Sculpt is What You Get: Modeling Physical Interactive Devices with Clay and 3D Printed Widgets. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 876–886. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858493
[14]
Yeji Kim, Sohyun Sim, Seoungjae Cho, Woon-woo Lee, Young-Sik Jeong, Kyungeun Cho, and Kyhyun Um. 2014. Intuitive NUI for Controlling Virtual Objects Based on Hand Movements. 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55038-6_71
[15]
Kazuyoshi Korida, Hiroaki Nishino, and Kouichi Utsumiya. 1997. An Interactive 3D Interface for a Virtual Ceramic Art Work Environment. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Virtual Systems and MultiMedia(VSMM ’97). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 227.
[16]
Yaron Lipman, David Levin, and Daniel Cohen-Or. 2008. Green Coordinates. 27, 3 (aug 2008), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1360612.1360677
[17]
Ignacio Llamas, Byungmoon Kim, Joshua Gargus, Jarek Rossignac, and Chris D. Shaw. 2003. Twister: A Space-Warp Operator for the Two-Handed Editing of 3D Shapes. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3 (July 2003), 663–668. https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882323
[18]
Julieta Martinez, Rayat Hossain, Javier Romero, and James J. Little. 2017. A Simple yet Effective Baseline for 3D Human Pose Estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
[19]
Romain Prévost, Emily Whiting, Sylvain Lefebvre, and Olga Sorkine-Hornung. 2013. Make It Stand: Balancing Shapes for 3D Fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, Article 81 (jul 2013), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2461957
[20]
Samuel Reinders, Matthew Butler, and Kim Marriott. 2020. "Hey Model!" – Natural User Interactions and Agency in Accessible Interactive 3D Models. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376145
[21]
Michael L. Rivera and Scott E. Hudson. 2019. Desktop Electrospinning: A Single Extruder 3D Printer for Producing Rigid Plastic and Electrospun Textiles. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300434
[22]
Nazmus Saquib, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Li-Yi Wei, and Wilmot Li. 2019. Interactive Body-Driven Graphics for Augmented Video Performance. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300852
[23]
Steven Schkolne, Michael Pruett, and Peter Schröder. 2001. Surface Drawing: Creating Organic 3D Shapes with the Hand and Tangible Tools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365114
[24]
Haruki Takahashi and Jeeeun Kim. 2019. 3D Pen + 3D Printer: Exploring the Role of Humans and Fabrication Machines in Creative Making. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300525
[25]
Carlos E. Tejada, Raf Ramakers, Sebastian Boring, and Daniel Ashbrook. 2020. AirTouch: 3D-Printed Touch-Sensitive Objects Using Pneumatic Sensing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376136
[26]
Joshua Vasquez, Hannah Twigg-Smith, Jasper Tran O’Leary, and Nadya Peek. 2020. Jubilee: An Extensible Machine for Multi-Tool Fabrication. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376425
[27]
Vinayak and Karthik Ramani. 2015. A Gesture-Free Geometric Approach for Mid-Air Expression of Design Intent in 3D Virtual Pottery. Comput. Aided Des. 69, C (Dec. 2015), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.06.006
[28]
Philipp Wacker, Oliver Nowak, Simon Voelker, and Jan Borchers. 2019. ARPen: Mid-Air Object Manipulation Techniques for a Bimanual AR System with Pen & Smartphone. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300849
[29]
Te-Yen Wu, Shutong Qi, Junchi Chen, MuJie Shang, Jun Gong, Teddy Seyed, and Xing-Dong Yang. 2020. Fabriccio: Touchless Gestural Input on Interactive Fabrics. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376681
[30]
Yu Xing, Yu Zhou, Xin Yan, Haisen Zhao, Wenqiang Liu, Jingbo Jiang, and Lin Lu. 2021. Shell thickening for extrusion-based ceramics printing. Computers & Graphics 97(2021), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2021.04.031
[31]
Xin Yan, Lin Lu, Andrei Sharf, Xing Yu, and Yulu Sun. 2021. Man-Made by Computer: On-the-Fly Fine Texture 3D Printing. In Symposium on Computational Fabrication (Virtual Event, USA) (SCF ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485114.3485119
[32]
Fanchao Zhong, Wenqiang Liu, Yu Zhou, Xin Yan, Yi Wan, and Lin Lu. 2020. Ceramic 3D printed sweeping surfaces. Computers & Graphics 90(2020), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2020.05.007

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PM4Pottery: A Scriptable Parametric Modeling Interface for Conceptual Pottery Design Using PM4VR2024 10th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA)10.1109/ICARA60736.2024.10552967(496-500)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024

Index Terms

  1. DancingPottery: Posture-Driven Pottery Generative Design and Fabrication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SCF '22: Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication
      October 2022
      201 pages
      ISBN:9781450398725
      DOI:10.1145/3559400
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Ceramic Printing
      2. Digital Fabrication
      3. Interactive Modeling
      4. Posture

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      SCF '22
      SCF '22: Symposium on Computational Fabrication
      October 26 - 28, 2022
      WA, Seattle, USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)78
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
      Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)PM4Pottery: A Scriptable Parametric Modeling Interface for Conceptual Pottery Design Using PM4VR2024 10th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA)10.1109/ICARA60736.2024.10552967(496-500)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media