skip to main content
10.1145/3560107.3560129acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrating BPMN with DMN to model complex Public Services: The case of Getting a Transportation Card for Disabled in Greece

Published: 18 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The provision of high-quality Public Services (PSs) constitutes a core activity of the public sector. Consequently, PS modeling has received considerable attention. The Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is a standard often employed in PS modeling. BPMN diagrams are clear and understandable in the case of simple PSs. However, this is not true when modeling complex PSs i.e., those including a large number of versions. Different versions exist in a complex PS since, for example, different groups of citizens may have to submit different supporting documents with their application based on their financial or civil status. In those cases, the relevant BPMN diagrams often have numerous gateways thus becoming very complex, which hinders their applicability and usefulness. In the last few years, the Decision Model and Notation (DMN) has been introduced and its integration with BPMN is used for modeling complicated business processes in the private sector. However, its effectiveness has not been investigated in the case of complex PSs. The aim of this research is to investigate the benefits and challenges of modeling complex PSs using BPMN and DMN. For this purpose, the Greek PS “Getting a Transportation Card for Disabled” is analyzed and BPMN is used to model the PS in two different ways, one with and one without the use of DMN. The results suggest that DMN models provide useful insights into the different PS versions while BPMN diagrams become simpler and more understandable. On the other hand, the public sector needs to accommodate yet another modeling notation which increases the required human capital needed for PS modeling.

References

[1]
Walser Konrad, Schaffroth Marc. 2011. BPM and BPMN as Integrating Concepts in eGovernment - The Swiss eGovernment BPM Ecosystem. In Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 138. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[2]
Gabryelczyk Renata, Kulesza Piotr, and Rakowska Elzbieta. 2018. Improving public sector performance by using business process modelling and measurement: a case study analysis.In Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, (102), pp.115–132.
[3]
Hasić Faruk, De Smedt Johannes, and Vanthienen Jan. 2018. Augmenting processes with decision intelligence: Principles for integrated modelling.In Decision Support Systems, vol. 107, pp. 1–12.
[4]
OMG. 2021. "Decision Model and Notation (DMN 1.3)". Retrieved at Oct 1, 2022 from https://www.omg.org/spec/DMN.
[5]
Hasić Faruk, De Smedt Johannes, and Vanthienen Jan. 2018. Redesigning Processes for Decision – Awareness: Strategies for Integrated Modelling. In 11th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), September 2018. pp. 247-250.
[6]
Genon Nicolas, Heymans Patrick, and Amyot Daniel. 2011. Analyzing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation. In Software Language Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 377–396.
[7]
Freund Jakob, and Rücker Bernd. 2019. Real-Life BPMN (4th edition): Includes an introduction to DMN.
[8]
OMG. 2013. Business process model and notation (BPMN 2.0). Retrieved at October 1, 2022 from https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/About-BPMN/
[9]
Kuhn Peter, Buchinger Matthias, and Balta Dian. 2021. How to Redesign Government Processes for Proactive Public Services?. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.29–40.
[10]
Athanasopoulos Konstantinos, Nikoletos Georgios, GeorgiadisGeorgios, Stamelos Ioannis, and Skolarikis Spiros. 2017. Process Management in the Greek Public Sector. Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics.
[11]
Batoulis Kimon, Meyer Andreas, Bazhenova Ekaterina, Decker Gero, and Weske Mathias. 2015. Extracting Decision Logic from Process Models. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Cham, pp. 349–366.
[12]
Janssens Laurent, Bazhenova Ekaterina, De Smedt Johannes, Vanthienen Jan, and Denecker Marc. 2016. Consistent Integration of Decision (DMN) and Process (BPMN) Models.
[13]
Mertens Steven, Gailly Frederik and, Poels Geert. 2015. Enhancing Declarative Process Models with DMN Decision Logic. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 151–65.
[14]
Callewaert Benjamin, Vandevelde Simon, and Vannekens Joost. 2022. Context – Aware Verification of DMN. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[15]
De Leoni Massimiliano, Felli Paolo, and Montali Marco. 2021. Integrating BPMN and DMN: Modeling and Analysis. Journal on Data Semantics. pp.165-188.
[16]
Biard Thierry, Le Mauff Alecandre, Bigand Michel, and Bourey Jean-Pierre. 2015. Separation of Decision Modeling from Business Process Modeling Using New ‘Decision Model and Notation’ (DMN) for Automating Operational Decision-Making. In Risks and Resilience of Collaborative Networks, Cham, pp. 489–496.
[17]
Hasić Faruk, De Smedt Johannes, and Vanthienen Jan. 2017. An Illustration of Five Principles for Integrated Process and Decision Modelling (5PDM). Social Science Research Network. Rochester, NY, SSRN, Scholarly Paper ID 3082752. / ssrn.3082752

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Integrating BPMN with DMN to model complex Public Services: The case of Getting a Transportation Card for Disabled in Greece

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEGOV '22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
    October 2022
    623 pages
    ISBN:9781450396356
    DOI:10.1145/3560107
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)
    2. Decision Model and Notation (DMN)
    3. Public Service (PS)
    4. Transportation Card

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ICEGOV 2022

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 158
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media