skip to main content
10.1145/3562007.3562039acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccrisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ultrasound image edge enhancement method based on Bayesian Non-Local Means and Convolution Neural Network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to effectively improve the speckle noise suppression ability and preserve edge structure information in medical ultrasound images, an edge enhancement method based on Bayesian Non-Local Means and Convolution Neural Network is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the method performs smoothing filtering based on Bayesian Non-Local Means. And then introduces Local Laplacian Filter to enhance edge of the denoised image to improve the edge preservation ability. Finally, the edge-enhanced images and the speckle noise images as dataset to train Convolutional Neural Network denoising model. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is superior to the traditional denoising algorithms that is compared in both speckle noise suppression and edge information retention.

References

  1. Goyal B, Dogra A, Agrawal S, Image denoising review: From classical to state-of-the-art approaches[J]. Information fusion, 2020, 55: 220-244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Fu Xiaowei, Yang Xuefei, Chen Fang, An adaptive medical ultrasound images despeckling method based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2020, 42(07): 1782-1789.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sagheer S V M, George S N. A review on medical image denoising algorithms[J]. Biomedical signal processing and control, 2020, 61: 102036.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hao Z C, Hong J S. UWB bandpass filter using cascaded miniature high-pass and low-pass filters with multilayer liquid crystal polymer technology[J]. IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques, 2010, 58(4): 941-948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zhang J, Lin G, Wu L, Speckle filtering of medical ultrasonic images using wavelet and guided filter[J]. Ultrasonics, 2016, 65: 177-193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Yongjian Y and Acton S T . Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion, Image Processing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2002, 11(11):1260-1270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Buades A, Coll B, Morel J M. A non-local algorithm for image denoising[C]//2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05). San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, 2005: 60-65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Image denoising with block-matching and 3D filtering[J]. Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems, Neural Networks, and Machine Learning, 2006, 6064: 354-365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Coupé P, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2009, 18(10): 2221-2229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wang Y, Ge X, Ma H, Deep learning in medical ultrasound image analysis: a review[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 54310-54324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chen J, Chen J, Chao H, Image blind denoising with generative adversarial network based noise modeling[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Salt Lake City, UT, USA: IEEE, 2018: 3155-3164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2017, 26(7): 3142-3155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zheng Yuanyue, Xu Mingen, Wang Ling. Improved weighted non-local mean ultrasonic image denoising[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2017, 22(06): 778-786.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhou Y, Zang H, Xu S, An iterative speckle filtering algorithm for ultrasound images based on Bayesian nonlocal means filter model[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2019, 48: 104-117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Paris S, Hasinoff S W, Kautz J. Local Laplacian filters: Edge-aware image processing with a Laplacian pyramid[J]. ACM Trans. Graph., 2011, 30(4): 68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sumiya Y, Otsuka T, Maeda Y, Gaussian Fourier Pyramid for Local Laplacian Filter[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2021, 29: 11-15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Zhang Huijuan, Zhang Damin, Yan Wei, Wavelet transform image denoising algorithm based on improved threshold function [J]. Application Research of Computers, 2020, 37(5): 1545-1548.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Xiong Chengchen, Jiang Weili, Jian Lizhong, Noise reduction model of medical ultrasound images based on dual attention mechanism[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(02):411-420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Ultrasound image edge enhancement method based on Bayesian Non-Local Means and Convolution Neural Network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CCRIS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Control, Robotics and Intelligent System
        August 2022
        253 pages
        ISBN:9781450396851
        DOI:10.1145/3562007

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 October 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format