skip to main content
10.1145/3563359.3596984acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design framework for the development of tailored behavior change technologies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today, so-called persuasive or motivational technologies are developing, which refer to technologies, applications or services designed to induce changes in attitudes and behavior in those who use them. This is the subject of research in Human-Computer Interaction in connection with theories from psychology related, for example, to behavior change or motivation. Research on these technologies suggests that in order to encourage long-term adherence, these "virtual coaches" need to be personalized and/or tailored according to the individual characteristics of the users (stage of behavior change, motivations, preferences, barriers). For example, according to the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), an individual can present different forms of motivation, more or less effective. The idea is to be able to identify the forms of motivation present in users in order to propose services to reinforce or develop them. The use of such systems in the field of health has the potential to induce and reinforce health behaviors that are sometimes difficult to establish by health professionals. Providing daily, personalized care represents a considerable human and financial cost for health professionals. A mobile application has the advantage of being able to deal with these constraints. The computer coach is designed with and for patients suffering from chronic low back pain. The aim is to help them manage their condition, particularly with regard to their pain and the practice of regular physical activity. The work presented presents an innovative design approach, combining user-centered methodologies and psychological theories, which we detail through a research phase and a design phase. Currently, a first version of the application has been developed and is being tested.

References

  1. S. Michie, L. Yardley, R. West, K. Patrick, et F. Greaves, « Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop », J Med Internet Res, vol. 19, no 6, Art. no 6, juin 2017, doi: 10.2196/jmir.7126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lalloo, C., Jibb, L. A., Rivera, J., Agarwal, A., & Stinson, J. N. (2015). “There's a Pain App for That” : Review of Patient-targeted Smartphone Applications for Pain Management. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 31(6), 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000171Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Masthoff et J. Vassileva, « Tutorial on Personalization for Behaviour Change », in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Atlanta Georgia USA, mars 2015, p. 439‑442. doi: 10.1145/2678025.2716264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. J. Fogg, B. J. (Stanford U. F. U.S.A.) Stanford CA, G. E. Fogg, et P. G. Zimbardo, Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Oinas-Kukkonen, « A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems », Pers Ubiquit Comput, vol. 17, no 6, Art. no 6, août 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00779-012-0591-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Oinas-Kukkonen et M. Harjumaa, « Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features », CAIS, vol. 24, 2009, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mirsch, T.; Lehrer, C.; Jung, R. (2017): Digital Nudging: Altering User Behavior in Digital Environments, in Leimeister, J.M.; Brenner, W. (Hrsg.): Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017), St. Gallen, S. 634-648Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. AlMarshedi, A., Wanick, V., Wills, G. B., & Ranchhod, A. (2017). Gamification and Behaviour. In S. Stieglitz, C. Lattemann, S. Robra-Bissantz, R. Zarnekow, & T. Brockmann (Éds.), Gamification: Using Game Elements in Serious Contexts (p. 19–29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45557-0_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an Ethics of Persuasive Technology. Commun. ACM, 42(5), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301410Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Smids, J. (2012). The Voluntariness of Persuasive Technology. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety. PERSUASIVE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Atkinson, B.M.C. (2006). Captology: A Critical Review. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3962. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_25Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. Whitehead et P. Seaton, « The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review », Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 18, no 5, Art. no 5, mai 2016, doi: 10.2196/jmir.4883.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Bort-Roig, N. D. Gilson, A. Puig-Ribera, R. S. Contreras, et S. G. Trost, « Measuring and Influencing Physical Activity with Smartphone Technology: A Systematic Review », Sports Med, vol. 44, no 5, Art. no 5, mai 2014, doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0142-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Du, W. Liu, S. Cai, Y. Hu, et J. Dong, « The efficacy of e-health in the self-management of chronic low back pain: A meta analysis », International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 106, p. 103507, juin 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. L. F. Sandal , « Effectiveness of App-Delivered, Tailored Self-management Support for Adults With Lower Back Pain–Related Disability: A selfBACK Randomized Clinical Trial », JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 181, no 10, Art. no 10, oct. 2021, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. B. Irvine , « Mobile-Web App to Self-Manage Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial », J Med Internet Res, vol. 17, no 1, Art. no 1, janv. 2015, doi: 10.2196/jmir.3130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M. & West, R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci 6, 42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michie. S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., P. Eccles, M., Cane, J., E. Wood, C, The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Volume 46, Issue 1, August 2013, Pages 81–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,54-67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Thurnheer, S. E., Gravestock, I., Pichierri, G., Steurer, J., & Burgstaller, J. M. (2018). Benefits of Mobile Apps in Pain Management: Systematic Review. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 6(10), e11231. https://doi.org/10.2196/11231Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rintala A, Rantalainen R, Kaksonen A, Luomajoki H, Kauranen K. mHealth Apps for Low Back Pain Self-management: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(8):e39682 doi: 10.2196/39682 PMID: 36018713Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Nicholl, B. I., Sandal, L. F., Stochkendahl, M. J., McCallum, M., Suresh, N., Vasseljen, O., Hartvigsen, J., Mork, P. J., Kjaer, P., Søgaard, K., & Mair, F. S. (2017). Digital Support Interventions for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e179. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Palazzo, C., Klinger, E., Dorner, V., Kadri, A., Thierry, O., Boumenir, Y., Martin, W., Poiraudeau, S., & Ville, I. (2016). Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain : Patient expectations regarding new technologies. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 59(2), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2016.01.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Van Weering, M. G. H. D.-, Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., & Hermens, H. J. (2012). Do Personalized Feedback Messages about Activity Patterns Stimulate Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain to Change their Activity Behavior on a Short Term Notice? Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37(2), 81–89. doi:10.1007/s10484-012-9181-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Grolier, M., Arefyev, A., Pereira, B., Tavares Figueiredo, I., Gerbaud, L., & Coudeyre, E. (2020). Refining the design of a smartphone application for people with chronic low back pain using mixed quantitative and qualitative approaches. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1839575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. Schwarzer, « Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) as a Theoretical Framework to Understand Behavior Change », Actualidades en Psicología, vol. 30, no 121, Art. no 121, déc. 2016, doi: 10.15517/ap.v30i121.23458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. L. Boutevillain, A. Dupeyron, C. Rouch, E. Richard, et E. Coudeyre, « Facilitators and barriers to physical activity in people with chronic low back pain: A qualitative study », PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no 7, Art. no 7, juill. 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179826.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Saner, E. M. Bergman, R. A. de Bie, et J. M. Sieben, « Low back pain patients’ perspectives on long-term adherence to home-based exercise programmes in physiotherapy », Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, vol. 38, p. 77‑82, déc. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.09.002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. K. Oyibo, I. Adaji, R. Orji, J. Ham, et J. Vassileva, « Adaptive and Personalized Persuasive Technologies », in Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Utrecht Netherlands, juin 2021, p. 255‑256. doi: 10.1145/3450614.3461450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. N. Aldenaini, F. Alqahtani, R. Orji, et S. Sampalli, « Trends in Persuasive Technologies for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review », Front. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, p. 7, avr. 2020, doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. B. A. Kamphorst, « E-coaching systems », Pers Ubiquit Comput, vol. 21, no 4, Art. no 4, août 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00779-017-1020-6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. H. op den Akker, V. M. Jones, et H. J. Hermens, « Tailoring real-time physical activity coaching systems: a literature survey and model », User Model User-Adap Inter, vol. 24, no 5, p. 351‑392, déc. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11257-014-9146-y.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. F. Monteiro-Guerra, O. Rivera-Romero, L. Fernandez-Luque, et B. Caulfield, « Personalization in Real-Time Physical Activity Coaching Using Mobile Applications: A Scoping Review », IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 24, no 6, Art. no 6, juin 2020, doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2947243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Debackere, F., Clavel, C., Roren, A., Tran, V., Snoubra, G., Messai, Y., Rannou, F., Nguyen, C., & Martin, J. (2022). Profiling of low back pain patients for the design of a tailored coaching application. 2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 1‑8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII55700.2022.9953873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. T. Dekkers, « Data-driven Patient Profiles: Definition, validation, and implementation for tailored orthopaedic healthcare services », Delft University of Technology, 2020. doi: 10.4233/UUID:A9ED38E9-4CF5-4B35-A43C-68C1B283E938.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. B. Groeneveld, M. Melles, S. Vehmeijer, N. Mathijssen, L. van Dijk, et R. Goossens, « Tailored patient experiences: IEA 2018: 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association », Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume I, vol. 1, p. 198‑207, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96098-2_26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. C. K. J. Wang et S. J. H. Biddle, « Young People's Motivational Profiles in Physical Activity: A Cluster Analysis », Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 23, no 1, Art. no 1, mars 2001, doi: 10.1123/jsep.23.1.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. H. Matsumoto et K. Takenaka, « Motivational Profiles and Stages of Exercise Behavior Change », International Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 2, p. 89‑96, 2004, doi: 10.5432/ijshs.2.89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. A. Lacasse, P. Bourgault, Y. Tousignant-Laflamme, R. Courtemanche-Harel, et M. Choinière, « Development and Validation of the French-Canadian Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale », Pain Research and Management, vol. 20, no 2, Art. no 2, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/832875.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. K. Kroenke, R. L. Spitzer, et J. B. W. Williams, « The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure », J Gen Intern Med, vol. 16, no 9, Art. no 9, sept. 2001, doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. J. Boiché, M. Gourlan, D. Trouilloud, et P. Sarrazin, « Development and validation of the ‘Echelle de Motivation envers l'Activité Physique en contexte de Santé’: A motivation scale towards health-oriented physical activity in French », J Health Psychol, vol. 24, no 3, Art. no 3, mars 2019, doi: 10.1177/1359105316676626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. G. Waddell, M. Newton, I. Henderson, D. Somerville, et C. J. Main, « A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability », Pain, vol. 52, no 2, Art. no 2, févr. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jane. Clatworthy, Deanna. Buick, Matthew. Hankins, John. Weinman, et Robert. Horne, « The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: A review », British Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 10, no 3, Art. no 3, sept. 2005, doi: 10.1348/135910705X25697.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, et R. A. Olshen, Classification and Regression Trees. Taylor & Francis, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. B. Groeneveld, M. Melles, S. Vehmeijer, N. Mathijssen, T. Dekkers, et R. Goossens, « Developing digital applications for tailored communication in orthopaedics using a Research through Design approach », DIGITAL HEALTH, vol. 5, p. 205520761882491, janv. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2055207618824919.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Lagger, G., Pataky, Z., & Golay, A. (2010). Efficacy of therapeutic patient education in chronic diseases and obesity. Patient Education and Counseling, 79(3), 283-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. S. Rozenberg, V. Foltz, et B. Fautrel, « Treatment strategy for chronic low back pain », Joint Bone Spine, vol. 79, no 6, Art. no 6, déc. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.09.003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. W. R. Marchand, « Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, and Zen Meditation for Depression, Anxiety, Pain, and Psychological Distress », Journal of Psychiatric Practice, vol. 18, no 4, Art. no 4, juill. 2012, doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000416014.53215.86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. C. Williamson, G. Baker, N. Mutrie, A. Niven, et P. Kelly, « Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging », Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, vol. 17, no 1, Art. no 1, déc. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00954-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. D. Markland et D. K. Ingledew, « The measurement of exercise motives: Factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised Exercise Motivations Inventory », British Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 2, no 4, Art. no 4, nov. 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1997.tb00549.x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UMAP '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
    June 2023
    446 pages
    ISBN:9781450398916
    DOI:10.1145/3563359

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 June 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)128
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format