ABSTRACT
Today, so-called persuasive or motivational technologies are developing, which refer to technologies, applications or services designed to induce changes in attitudes and behavior in those who use them. This is the subject of research in Human-Computer Interaction in connection with theories from psychology related, for example, to behavior change or motivation. Research on these technologies suggests that in order to encourage long-term adherence, these "virtual coaches" need to be personalized and/or tailored according to the individual characteristics of the users (stage of behavior change, motivations, preferences, barriers). For example, according to the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), an individual can present different forms of motivation, more or less effective. The idea is to be able to identify the forms of motivation present in users in order to propose services to reinforce or develop them. The use of such systems in the field of health has the potential to induce and reinforce health behaviors that are sometimes difficult to establish by health professionals. Providing daily, personalized care represents a considerable human and financial cost for health professionals. A mobile application has the advantage of being able to deal with these constraints. The computer coach is designed with and for patients suffering from chronic low back pain. The aim is to help them manage their condition, particularly with regard to their pain and the practice of regular physical activity. The work presented presents an innovative design approach, combining user-centered methodologies and psychological theories, which we detail through a research phase and a design phase. Currently, a first version of the application has been developed and is being tested.
- S. Michie, L. Yardley, R. West, K. Patrick, et F. Greaves, « Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop », J Med Internet Res, vol. 19, no 6, Art. no 6, juin 2017, doi: 10.2196/jmir.7126.Google Scholar
- Lalloo, C., Jibb, L. A., Rivera, J., Agarwal, A., & Stinson, J. N. (2015). “There's a Pain App for That” : Review of Patient-targeted Smartphone Applications for Pain Management. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 31(6), 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000171Google Scholar
- J. Masthoff et J. Vassileva, « Tutorial on Personalization for Behaviour Change », in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Atlanta Georgia USA, mars 2015, p. 439‑442. doi: 10.1145/2678025.2716264.Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. J. Fogg, B. J. (Stanford U. F. U.S.A.) Stanford CA, G. E. Fogg, et P. G. Zimbardo, Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.Google Scholar
- H. Oinas-Kukkonen, « A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems », Pers Ubiquit Comput, vol. 17, no 6, Art. no 6, août 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00779-012-0591-5.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Oinas-Kukkonen et M. Harjumaa, « Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features », CAIS, vol. 24, 2009, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02428.Google Scholar
- Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mirsch, T.; Lehrer, C.; Jung, R. (2017): Digital Nudging: Altering User Behavior in Digital Environments, in Leimeister, J.M.; Brenner, W. (Hrsg.): Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017), St. Gallen, S. 634-648Google Scholar
- AlMarshedi, A., Wanick, V., Wills, G. B., & Ranchhod, A. (2017). Gamification and Behaviour. In S. Stieglitz, C. Lattemann, S. Robra-Bissantz, R. Zarnekow, & T. Brockmann (Éds.), Gamification: Using Game Elements in Serious Contexts (p. 19–29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45557-0_2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an Ethics of Persuasive Technology. Commun. ACM, 42(5), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301410Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smids, J. (2012). The Voluntariness of Persuasive Technology. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety. PERSUASIVE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11Google ScholarDigital Library
- Atkinson, B.M.C. (2006). Captology: A Critical Review. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3962. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_25Google Scholar
- Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797Google Scholar
- L. Whitehead et P. Seaton, « The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review », Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 18, no 5, Art. no 5, mai 2016, doi: 10.2196/jmir.4883.Google Scholar
- J. Bort-Roig, N. D. Gilson, A. Puig-Ribera, R. S. Contreras, et S. G. Trost, « Measuring and Influencing Physical Activity with Smartphone Technology: A Systematic Review », Sports Med, vol. 44, no 5, Art. no 5, mai 2014, doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0142-5.Google Scholar
- S. Du, W. Liu, S. Cai, Y. Hu, et J. Dong, « The efficacy of e-health in the self-management of chronic low back pain: A meta analysis », International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 106, p. 103507, juin 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103507.Google Scholar
- L. F. Sandal , « Effectiveness of App-Delivered, Tailored Self-management Support for Adults With Lower Back Pain–Related Disability: A selfBACK Randomized Clinical Trial », JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 181, no 10, Art. no 10, oct. 2021, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097.Google Scholar
- A. B. Irvine , « Mobile-Web App to Self-Manage Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial », J Med Internet Res, vol. 17, no 1, Art. no 1, janv. 2015, doi: 10.2196/jmir.3130.Google Scholar
- Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M. & West, R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci 6, 42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42Google Scholar
- Michie. S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., P. Eccles, M., Cane, J., E. Wood, C, The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Volume 46, Issue 1, August 2013, Pages 81–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6Google Scholar
- Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for Motivation, Engagement and Wellbeing in Digital Experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,54-67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thurnheer, S. E., Gravestock, I., Pichierri, G., Steurer, J., & Burgstaller, J. M. (2018). Benefits of Mobile Apps in Pain Management: Systematic Review. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 6(10), e11231. https://doi.org/10.2196/11231Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rintala A, Rantalainen R, Kaksonen A, Luomajoki H, Kauranen K. mHealth Apps for Low Back Pain Self-management: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(8):e39682 doi: 10.2196/39682 PMID: 36018713Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicholl, B. I., Sandal, L. F., Stochkendahl, M. J., McCallum, M., Suresh, N., Vasseljen, O., Hartvigsen, J., Mork, P. J., Kjaer, P., Søgaard, K., & Mair, F. S. (2017). Digital Support Interventions for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e179. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7290Google ScholarCross Ref
- Palazzo, C., Klinger, E., Dorner, V., Kadri, A., Thierry, O., Boumenir, Y., Martin, W., Poiraudeau, S., & Ville, I. (2016). Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain : Patient expectations regarding new technologies. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 59(2), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2016.01.009Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van Weering, M. G. H. D.-, Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., & Hermens, H. J. (2012). Do Personalized Feedback Messages about Activity Patterns Stimulate Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain to Change their Activity Behavior on a Short Term Notice? Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37(2), 81–89. doi:10.1007/s10484-012-9181-6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grolier, M., Arefyev, A., Pereira, B., Tavares Figueiredo, I., Gerbaud, L., & Coudeyre, E. (2020). Refining the design of a smartphone application for people with chronic low back pain using mixed quantitative and qualitative approaches. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1839575Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Schwarzer, « Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) as a Theoretical Framework to Understand Behavior Change », Actualidades en Psicología, vol. 30, no 121, Art. no 121, déc. 2016, doi: 10.15517/ap.v30i121.23458.Google Scholar
- L. Boutevillain, A. Dupeyron, C. Rouch, E. Richard, et E. Coudeyre, « Facilitators and barriers to physical activity in people with chronic low back pain: A qualitative study », PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no 7, Art. no 7, juill. 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179826.Google Scholar
- J. Saner, E. M. Bergman, R. A. de Bie, et J. M. Sieben, « Low back pain patients’ perspectives on long-term adherence to home-based exercise programmes in physiotherapy », Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, vol. 38, p. 77‑82, déc. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.09.002.Google Scholar
- K. Oyibo, I. Adaji, R. Orji, J. Ham, et J. Vassileva, « Adaptive and Personalized Persuasive Technologies », in Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Utrecht Netherlands, juin 2021, p. 255‑256. doi: 10.1145/3450614.3461450.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Aldenaini, F. Alqahtani, R. Orji, et S. Sampalli, « Trends in Persuasive Technologies for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review », Front. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, p. 7, avr. 2020, doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00007.Google Scholar
- B. A. Kamphorst, « E-coaching systems », Pers Ubiquit Comput, vol. 21, no 4, Art. no 4, août 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00779-017-1020-6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. op den Akker, V. M. Jones, et H. J. Hermens, « Tailoring real-time physical activity coaching systems: a literature survey and model », User Model User-Adap Inter, vol. 24, no 5, p. 351‑392, déc. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11257-014-9146-y.Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Monteiro-Guerra, O. Rivera-Romero, L. Fernandez-Luque, et B. Caulfield, « Personalization in Real-Time Physical Activity Coaching Using Mobile Applications: A Scoping Review », IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 24, no 6, Art. no 6, juin 2020, doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2947243.Google Scholar
- Debackere, F., Clavel, C., Roren, A., Tran, V., Snoubra, G., Messai, Y., Rannou, F., Nguyen, C., & Martin, J. (2022). Profiling of low back pain patients for the design of a tailored coaching application. 2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 1‑8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII55700.2022.9953873Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Dekkers, « Data-driven Patient Profiles: Definition, validation, and implementation for tailored orthopaedic healthcare services », Delft University of Technology, 2020. doi: 10.4233/UUID:A9ED38E9-4CF5-4B35-A43C-68C1B283E938.Google Scholar
- B. Groeneveld, M. Melles, S. Vehmeijer, N. Mathijssen, L. van Dijk, et R. Goossens, « Tailored patient experiences: IEA 2018: 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association », Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume I, vol. 1, p. 198‑207, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96098-2_26.Google Scholar
- C. K. J. Wang et S. J. H. Biddle, « Young People's Motivational Profiles in Physical Activity: A Cluster Analysis », Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 23, no 1, Art. no 1, mars 2001, doi: 10.1123/jsep.23.1.1.Google Scholar
- H. Matsumoto et K. Takenaka, « Motivational Profiles and Stages of Exercise Behavior Change », International Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 2, p. 89‑96, 2004, doi: 10.5432/ijshs.2.89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Lacasse, P. Bourgault, Y. Tousignant-Laflamme, R. Courtemanche-Harel, et M. Choinière, « Development and Validation of the French-Canadian Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale », Pain Research and Management, vol. 20, no 2, Art. no 2, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/832875.Google Scholar
- K. Kroenke, R. L. Spitzer, et J. B. W. Williams, « The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure », J Gen Intern Med, vol. 16, no 9, Art. no 9, sept. 2001, doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.Google Scholar
- J. Boiché, M. Gourlan, D. Trouilloud, et P. Sarrazin, « Development and validation of the ‘Echelle de Motivation envers l'Activité Physique en contexte de Santé’: A motivation scale towards health-oriented physical activity in French », J Health Psychol, vol. 24, no 3, Art. no 3, mars 2019, doi: 10.1177/1359105316676626.Google Scholar
- G. Waddell, M. Newton, I. Henderson, D. Somerville, et C. J. Main, « A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability », Pain, vol. 52, no 2, Art. no 2, févr. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B.Google Scholar
- Jane. Clatworthy, Deanna. Buick, Matthew. Hankins, John. Weinman, et Robert. Horne, « The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: A review », British Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 10, no 3, Art. no 3, sept. 2005, doi: 10.1348/135910705X25697.Google Scholar
- L. Breiman, J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, et R. A. Olshen, Classification and Regression Trees. Taylor & Francis, 1984.Google Scholar
- B. Groeneveld, M. Melles, S. Vehmeijer, N. Mathijssen, T. Dekkers, et R. Goossens, « Developing digital applications for tailored communication in orthopaedics using a Research through Design approach », DIGITAL HEALTH, vol. 5, p. 205520761882491, janv. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2055207618824919.Google Scholar
- Lagger, G., Pataky, Z., & Golay, A. (2010). Efficacy of therapeutic patient education in chronic diseases and obesity. Patient Education and Counseling, 79(3), 283-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.015Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Rozenberg, V. Foltz, et B. Fautrel, « Treatment strategy for chronic low back pain », Joint Bone Spine, vol. 79, no 6, Art. no 6, déc. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.09.003.Google Scholar
- W. R. Marchand, « Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, and Zen Meditation for Depression, Anxiety, Pain, and Psychological Distress », Journal of Psychiatric Practice, vol. 18, no 4, Art. no 4, juill. 2012, doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000416014.53215.86.Google Scholar
- C. Williamson, G. Baker, N. Mutrie, A. Niven, et P. Kelly, « Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging », Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, vol. 17, no 1, Art. no 1, déc. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00954-3.Google Scholar
- D. Markland et D. K. Ingledew, « The measurement of exercise motives: Factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised Exercise Motivations Inventory », British Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 2, no 4, Art. no 4, nov. 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1997.tb00549.x.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Beyond Behavior: The Coach's Perspective on Technology in Health Coaching
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRapid innovations in electronic healthcare and behavior tracking systems are challenging health coaches (dietitians, personal trainers, etc.) to rethink their traditional roles and healthcare practices. At the same time, many current e-coaching systems ...
Exploring the Effect of mHealth Technologies on Communication and Information Sharing in a Pediatric Critical Care Unit: A Case Study
Communication and information sharing is an important aspect of healthcare information technology and mHealth management. A main requirement in the quality of patient care is the ability of all health care participants to communicate. Research ...
Designing a Motivational Agent for Behavior Change in Physical Activity
CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPeople find behavior change particularly long-lasting change in habits regarding physical activity to be difficulty. While new technologies such as mobile applications that help individuals measure, log, and reflect on their activities hold great ...
Comments