skip to main content
10.1145/3563359.3596989acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Susceptibility of Online Users to Persuasive Strategies to Curb the Spread of Misinformation

Published:16 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The spread of misinformation in online social media is a cause of concern to stakeholders. With many people going online for information about many aspects of their lives, any misinformation presented online can have detrimental effects on those that consume it. The use of persuasive strategies to curb misinformation online is an ongoing research area. There is little or no knowledge of how persuasive strategies can be applied to the different types of social media users to curb the spread of misinformation. To contribute to research in this area, we present the preliminary results of an ongoing user study of currently 113 social media users which investigates which type of social media users will likely spread misinformation and what persuasive strategies will likely influence the different types of social media users. We developed and tested a global model using structural equation modelling. Our results suggest that people that use social media because of friendship and role-playing are influenced by social proof while people who use social media to seek for relationships are influenced by liking and are likely to spread misinformation in the future.

References

  1. Ifeoma Adaji, Kiemute Oyibo, and Julita Vassileva. 2018. Influence of Personality, Shopper type and Social Support on the Consumers’ Need for Status and Continuance Intention in E-commerce. In 32nd British Human Computer Interaction Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ifeoma Adaji, Kiemute Oyibo, and Julita Vassileva. 2018. The Effect of Gender and Age on the Factors That Influence Healthy Shopping Habits In E-Commerce Shoppers. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2018, ACM, 251–255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ifeoma Adaji, Kiemute Oyibo, and Julita Vassileva. 2020. E-Commerce Shopping Motivation and the Influence of Persuasive Strategies. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3: 67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Shakuntala Banaji, Bhat Ramnath, Anushi Agarwal, Passanha Nihal, and Mukti Sadhana Pravin. 2019. WhatsApp vigilantes: An exploration of citizen reception and circulation of WhatsApp misinformation linked to mob violence in India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jamshid Beheshti and Andrew Large. 2013. The information behavior of a new generation: Children and teens in the 21st century. The Scarecrow Press Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T Blumer and N Döring. 2012. Are we the same online? The expression of the five factor personality traits on the computer and the Internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 6, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael Buhrmester, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2015. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.).: 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, Rita Orji, Andrzej Marczewski, Wolfgang Hochleitner, Michael Lankes, Lennart E. Nacke, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Personalization in Serious and Persuasive Games and Gamified Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY ’15, 811–816. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, Michaela Reisinger, Rita Orji, Peter Fröhlich, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. More than Sex: The Role of Femininity and Masculinity in the Design of Personalized Persuasive Games. . Springer, Cham, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_19Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. RB Cialdini. 2001. The science of persuasion. Scientific American.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Robert B Cialdini. 2009. Influence: Science and practice. Pearson Education Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J Van Dijck and T Poell. 2017. Social media platforms and education. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media: 579–591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S Feldman. 2013. Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Joseph Hair Jr, Tomaas Hult, Christian Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2016. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Diana Hassouneh and Malaika Brengman. 2014. A motivation-based typology of social virtual world users. Computers in Human Behavior 33: 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2013.08.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S Venus Jin, Aziz Muqaddam, and Ehri Ryu. 2019. Instafamous and social media influencer marketing Article information: For Authors. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Genevieve Marie Johnson and Anastasia Kulpa. 2007. Dimensions of online behavior: Toward a user typology. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 10, 6: 773–779. https://doi.org/10.1089/CPB.2007.0043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kaptein. Maurits. 2011. Adaptive persuasive messages in an e-commerce setting: the use of persuasion profiles. In European Conference on Information Systems, 183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M Kaptein and A Halteren. 2013. Adaptive persuasive messaging to increase service retention: using persuasion profiles to increase the effectiveness of email reminders. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 6: 1173–1185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kaptein and Maurits. 2012. Personalized Persuasion in Ambient Intelligence. IOS Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Maurits Kaptein and Petri Parvinen. 2015. Dynamically Adapting Sales Influence Tactics In E-Commerce. In Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same…. Springer, 445–454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sander van der Linden. 2022. Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public. Nature Medicine 28, 3: 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Przemysław Majerczak and Artur Strzelecki. 2022. Trust, Media Credibility, Social Ties, and the Intention to Share towards Information Verification in an Age of Fake News. Behavioral Sciences 12, 2: 51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Winter Mason and Siddharth Suri. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 44, 1: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2008. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 164–176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rita Orji, Regan L. Mandryk, Julita Vassileva, and Kathrin M. Gerling. 2013. Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’13, 2467. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rita Orji, Lennart Nacke, and Chrysanne DiMarco. 2017. Towards personality-driven persuasive health games and gamified systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1015–1027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2014. Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, 5: 453–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-014-9149-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. K. Oyibo, I. Adaji, and J. Vassileva. 2019. Susceptibility to fitness app's persuasive features: Differences between acting and non-acting users. In ACM UMAP 2019 Adjunct - Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323851Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kiemute Oyibo, Ifeoma Adaji, Abdul Hammid Olagunju, Ralph Deters, Babatunde Olabenjo, and Julita Vassileva. 2019. Ben'fit: Design, implementation and evaluation of a culture-tailored fitness app. ACM UMAP 2019 Adjunct - Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization: 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323854Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pythagoras N. Petratos. 2021. Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: Cyber risks to business. Business Horizons 64, 6: 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2021.07.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Robert J Sternberg. 1987. Liking versus loving: A comparative evaluation of theories. Psychological Bulletin 102, 3: 331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. KKK Wong. 2013. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin. 24, 1: 1–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Amy X Zhang, Aditya Ranganathan, Sarah Emlen Metz, Scott Appling, Connie Moon Sehat, Norman Gilmore, Nick B Adams, Emmanuel Vincent, Jennifer 8 Lee, Martin Robbins, Ed Bice, Sandro Hawke, David Karger, An Xiao Mina, Con-Nie Moon Sehat, and Jen-Nifer Lee. 2018. A Structured Response to Misinformation: Defining and Annotating Credibility Indicators in News Articles. In International World Wide Web Conference, 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188731Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UMAP '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
    June 2023
    446 pages
    ISBN:9781450398916
    DOI:10.1145/3563359

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 June 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format