ABSTRACT
The spread of misinformation in online social media is a cause of concern to stakeholders. With many people going online for information about many aspects of their lives, any misinformation presented online can have detrimental effects on those that consume it. The use of persuasive strategies to curb misinformation online is an ongoing research area. There is little or no knowledge of how persuasive strategies can be applied to the different types of social media users to curb the spread of misinformation. To contribute to research in this area, we present the preliminary results of an ongoing user study of currently 113 social media users which investigates which type of social media users will likely spread misinformation and what persuasive strategies will likely influence the different types of social media users. We developed and tested a global model using structural equation modelling. Our results suggest that people that use social media because of friendship and role-playing are influenced by social proof while people who use social media to seek for relationships are influenced by liking and are likely to spread misinformation in the future.
- Ifeoma Adaji, Kiemute Oyibo, and Julita Vassileva. 2018. Influence of Personality, Shopper type and Social Support on the Consumers’ Need for Status and Continuance Intention in E-commerce. In 32nd British Human Computer Interaction Conference.Google Scholar
- Ifeoma Adaji, Kiemute Oyibo, and Julita Vassileva. 2018. The Effect of Gender and Age on the Factors That Influence Healthy Shopping Habits In E-Commerce Shoppers. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2018, ACM, 251–255.Google Scholar
- Ifeoma Adaji, Kiemute Oyibo, and Julita Vassileva. 2020. E-Commerce Shopping Motivation and the Influence of Persuasive Strategies. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3: 67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shakuntala Banaji, Bhat Ramnath, Anushi Agarwal, Passanha Nihal, and Mukti Sadhana Pravin. 2019. WhatsApp vigilantes: An exploration of citizen reception and circulation of WhatsApp misinformation linked to mob violence in India.Google Scholar
- Jamshid Beheshti and Andrew Large. 2013. The information behavior of a new generation: Children and teens in the 21st century. The Scarecrow Press Inc.Google Scholar
- T Blumer and N Döring. 2012. Are we the same online? The expression of the five factor personality traits on the computer and the Internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 6, 3.Google Scholar
- Michael Buhrmester, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2015. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed.).: 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-009Google Scholar
- Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, Rita Orji, Andrzej Marczewski, Wolfgang Hochleitner, Michael Lankes, Lennart E. Nacke, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Personalization in Serious and Persuasive Games and Gamified Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY ’15, 811–816. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810260Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, Michaela Reisinger, Rita Orji, Peter Fröhlich, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. More than Sex: The Role of Femininity and Masculinity in the Design of Personalized Persuasive Games. . Springer, Cham, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2_19Google ScholarDigital Library
- RB Cialdini. 2001. The science of persuasion. Scientific American.Google Scholar
- Robert B Cialdini. 2009. Influence: Science and practice. Pearson Education Boston.Google Scholar
- J Van Dijck and T Poell. 2017. Social media platforms and education. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media: 579–591.Google Scholar
- S Feldman. 2013. Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents.Google Scholar
- Joseph Hair Jr, Tomaas Hult, Christian Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2016. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Diana Hassouneh and Malaika Brengman. 2014. A motivation-based typology of social virtual world users. Computers in Human Behavior 33: 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2013.08.012Google ScholarDigital Library
- S Venus Jin, Aziz Muqaddam, and Ehri Ryu. 2019. Instafamous and social media influencer marketing Article information: For Authors. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375Google Scholar
- Genevieve Marie Johnson and Anastasia Kulpa. 2007. Dimensions of online behavior: Toward a user typology. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 10, 6: 773–779. https://doi.org/10.1089/CPB.2007.0043Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kaptein. Maurits. 2011. Adaptive persuasive messages in an e-commerce setting: the use of persuasion profiles. In European Conference on Information Systems, 183.Google Scholar
- M Kaptein and A Halteren. 2013. Adaptive persuasive messaging to increase service retention: using persuasion profiles to increase the effectiveness of email reminders. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 6: 1173–1185.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaptein and Maurits. 2012. Personalized Persuasion in Ambient Intelligence. IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Maurits Kaptein and Petri Parvinen. 2015. Dynamically Adapting Sales Influence Tactics In E-Commerce. In Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same…. Springer, 445–454.Google Scholar
- Sander van der Linden. 2022. Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public. Nature Medicine 28, 3: 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Przemysław Majerczak and Artur Strzelecki. 2022. Trust, Media Credibility, Social Ties, and the Intention to Share towards Information Verification in an Age of Fake News. Behavioral Sciences 12, 2: 51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winter Mason and Siddharth Suri. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 44, 1: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2008. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 164–176.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rita Orji, Regan L. Mandryk, Julita Vassileva, and Kathrin M. Gerling. 2013. Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’13, 2467. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481341Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rita Orji, Lennart Nacke, and Chrysanne DiMarco. 2017. Towards personality-driven persuasive health games and gamified systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1015–1027.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2014. Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, 5: 453–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-014-9149-8Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Oyibo, I. Adaji, and J. Vassileva. 2019. Susceptibility to fitness app's persuasive features: Differences between acting and non-acting users. In ACM UMAP 2019 Adjunct - Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323851Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiemute Oyibo, Ifeoma Adaji, Abdul Hammid Olagunju, Ralph Deters, Babatunde Olabenjo, and Julita Vassileva. 2019. Ben'fit: Design, implementation and evaluation of a culture-tailored fitness app. ACM UMAP 2019 Adjunct - Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization: 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323854Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pythagoras N. Petratos. 2021. Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: Cyber risks to business. Business Horizons 64, 6: 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2021.07.012Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert J Sternberg. 1987. Liking versus loving: A comparative evaluation of theories. Psychological Bulletin 102, 3: 331.Google ScholarCross Ref
- KKK Wong. 2013. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin. 24, 1: 1–32.Google Scholar
- Amy X Zhang, Aditya Ranganathan, Sarah Emlen Metz, Scott Appling, Connie Moon Sehat, Norman Gilmore, Nick B Adams, Emmanuel Vincent, Jennifer 8 Lee, Martin Robbins, Ed Bice, Sandro Hawke, David Karger, An Xiao Mina, Con-Nie Moon Sehat, and Jen-Nifer Lee. 2018. A Structured Response to Misinformation: Defining and Annotating Credibility Indicators in News Articles. In International World Wide Web Conference, 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188731Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Online Misinformation Spread: A Systematic Literature Map
ICISDM '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data MiningMisinformation is widely and rapidly spreading on social media platforms. This could result in severe negative effects on users and the quality of online generated content. Luckily, there is a growing interest among researchers to combat this spread of ...
Containment of misinformation spread in online social networks
WebSci '12: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science ConferenceWith their blistering expansions in recent years, popular on-line social sites such as Twitter, Facebook and Bebo, have become some of the major news sources as well as the most effective channels for viral marketing nowadays. However, alongside these ...
Contrasting the Spread of Misinformation in Online Social Networks
AAMAS '17: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsThe emergence of online social networks has revolutionized the way people seek and share information. Nowadays, popular online social sites as Twitter, Facebook and Google+ are among the major news sources as well as the most effective channels for ...
Comments