skip to main content
10.1145/3563657.3596045acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing Inclusive Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles for Older Passengers

Published: 10 July 2023 Publication History

Abstract

With the introduction of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in real-world traffic, there are several human-computer interactions (HCI) challenges—especially how a passenger might interact with an AV where the human driver is absent. Riding inside an AV could be more challenging for older adults who are expected to be one of the largest user cohorts of AV. In this work, we conducted an interview session with senior participants (N=10) which allowed us to identify specific design needs for elderly passengers to have reliable communication with AVs. Based on the findings, we implemented five proof-of-concept prototypes in virtual reality (VR) and evaluated them through a user study with another group of elderly participants (N=15). Informed by the outcome, we discuss design insights for implementing inclusive interfaces inside the AVs that will be supportive of the functional abilities and cognitive needs of older adults to increase psychological driving comfort and perceived safety.

Supplemental Material

ZIP File
"Paper video - long version": demonstrates the research work in detail.

References

[1]
Sarah Abdi, Alice Spann, Jacinta Borilovic, Luc de Witte, and Mark Hawley. 2019. Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF). BMC geriatrics 19, 1 (2019), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1189-9
[2]
Gus Alexiou. 2021. How Passengers With Disabilities Can Drive The Autonomous Vehicle Revolution. Retrieved April 15, 2022 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/gusalexiou/2021/04/11/how-passengers-with-disabilities-can-drive-the-autonomous-vehicle-revolution/?sh=7d0248b618a5
[3]
Ashratuz Zavin Asha, Fahim Anzum, Patrick Finn, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2020. Designing External Automotive Displays: VR Prototypes and Analysis. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410658
[4]
Ashratuz Zavin Asha, Christopher Smith, Georgina Freeman, Sean Crump, Sowmya Somanath, Lora Oehlberg, and Ehud Sharlin. 2021. Co-Designing Interactions between Pedestrians in Wheelchairs and Autonomous Vehicles. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462068
[5]
Thierry Bellet, Jean-Christophe Paris, and Claude Marin-Lamellet. 2018. Difficulties experienced by older drivers during their regular driving and their expectations towards Advanced Driving Aid Systems and vehicle automation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 52 (2018), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.014
[6]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (2019), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
[7]
Julian Brinkley, Brianna Posadas, Imani Sherman, Shaundra B. Daily, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2019. An Open Road Evaluation of a Self-Driving Vehicle Human–Machine Interface Designed for Visually Impaired Users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35, 11 (2019), 1018–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561787
[8]
John Brooke 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4–7.
[9]
US Census Bureau. 2023. Older Americans Month. Retrieved June 2, 2023 from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/stories/older-americans-month.html
[10]
Elizabeth Cha, Yunkyung Kim, Terrence Fong, and Maja J. Matarić. 2018. A Survey of Nonverbal Signaling Methods for Non-Humanoid Robots. Found. Trends Robotics 6 (2018), 211–323.
[11]
Sergiu Coicheci and Ioan Filip. 2020. Self-driving vehicles: current status of development and technical challenges to overcome. In 2020 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI). 000255–000260. https://doi.org/10.1109/SACI49304.2020.9118809
[12]
Mark Colley, Benjamin Eder, Jan Ole Rixen, and Enrico Rukzio. 2021. Effects of Semantic Segmentation Visualization on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load in Highly Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 155, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445351
[13]
Mark Colley, Marcel Walch, and Enrico Rukzio. 2019. For a Better (Simulated) World: Considerations for VR in External Communication Research. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351523
[14]
S Czaja, M Ceruso, W Boot, N Charness, and W Rogers. 2021. STRUMM: An Intelligent, Adaptive Software Package for Older Adults With a Cognitive Impairment. Innovation in Aging 5, Suppl 1 (2021), 194–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.733
[15]
Yngve Dahl and Geir Kjetil Hanssen. 2018. “Do You See What I Hear?”: Designing for Collocated Patient–Practitioner Collaboration in Audiological Consultations. Human–Computer Interaction 33, 5-6 (2018), 372–421.
[16]
Gordana Dermody, Lisa Whitehead, Graham Wilson, and Courtney Glass. 2020. The Role of Virtual Reality in Improving Health Outcomes for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 22, 6 (1 Jun 2020), e17331. https://doi.org/10.2196/17331
[17]
Haoyu Dong, Marieke Martens, and Bastian Pfleging. 2021. An Online Study to Explore Trust in Highly Automated Vehicle in Non-Critical Automated Driving Scenarios. In 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Leeds, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’21 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473682.3480259
[18]
David W Eby, Lisa J Molnar, and Sergiu C Stanciu. 2018. Older adults’ attitudes and opinions about automated vehicles: A literature review. Technical Report. Center for Advancing Transportation Leadership and Safety (ATLAS Center). University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/63609
[19]
David W. Eby, Lisa J. Molnar, Jennifer S. Zakrajsek, Lindsay H. Ryan, Nicole Zanier, Renée M. St. Louis, Sergiu C. Stanciu, David LeBlanc, Lidia P. Kostyniuk, Jacqui Smith, Raymond Yung, Linda Nyquist, Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Guohua Li, Thelma J. Mielenz, and David Strogatz. 2018. Prevalence, attitudes, and knowledge of in-vehicle technologies and vehicle adaptations among older drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention 113 (2018), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.022
[20]
Fredrick Ekman, Mikael Johansson, and Jana Sochor. 2018. Creating Appropriate Trust in Automated Vehicle Systems: A Framework for HMI Design. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 48, 1 (2018), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2776209
[21]
Koen Faber and Dea van Lierop. 2020. How will older adults use automated vehicles? Assessing the role of AVs in overcoming perceived mobility barriers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 133 (2020), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.022
[22]
Alexander Feierle, Simon Danner, Sarah Steininger, and Klaus Bengler. 2020. Information Needs and Visual Attention during Urban, Highly Automated Driving—An Investigation of Potential Influencing Factors. Information 11, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020062
[23]
C. Gasne, L. Paire-Ficout, S. Bordel, S. Lafont, and M. Ranchet. 2022. Takeover performance of older drivers in automated driving: A review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 87 (2022), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.04.015
[24]
Timothy Geary and David Danks. 2019. Balancing the Benefits of Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314237
[25]
Aaron Gluck, Kwajo Boateng, Earl W. Huff Jr., and Julian Brinkley. 2020. Putting Older Adults in the Driver Seat: Using User Enactment to Explore the Design of a Shared Autonomous Vehicle. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410645
[26]
Shabnam Haghzare, Jennifer L. Campos, Katherine Bak, and Alex Mihailidis. 2021. Older adults’ acceptance of fully automated vehicles: Effects of exposure, driving style, age, and driving conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention 150 (2021), 105919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105919
[27]
Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139–183.
[28]
Franziska Hartwich, Matthias Beggiato, and Josef F. Krems. 2018. Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving – effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics 61, 8 (2018), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448
[29]
Franziska Hartwich, Cornelia Hollander, Daniela Johannmeyer, and Josef F. Krems. 2021. Improving Passenger Experience and Trust in Automated Vehicles Through User-Adaptive HMIs: “The More the Better” Does Not Apply to Everyone. Frontiers in Human Dynamics 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.669030
[30]
Hany M. Hassan, Mark R. Ferguson, Saiedeh Razavi, and Brenda Vrkljan. 2019. Factors That Influence Older Canadians’ Preferences for using Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Structural Equation Analysis. Transportation Research Record 2673, 1 (2019), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118822281
[31]
Hany M. Hassan, Mark R. Ferguson, Brenda Vrkljan, Bruce Newbold, and Saiedeh Razavi. 2021. Older adults and their willingness to use semi and fully autonomous vehicles: A structural equation analysis11Revised manuscript prepared for publication at the special issue in Journal of Transport Geography: “Elderly’s mobility and the living environment”.Journal of Transport Geography 95 (2021), 103133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103133
[32]
Renate Häuslschmid, Max von Bülow, Bastian Pfleging, and Andreas Butz. 2017. Supporting Trust in Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025198
[33]
Gaojian Huang, Ya-Hsin Hung, Robert W. Proctor, and Brandon J. Pitts. 2022. Age is more than just a number: The relationship among age, non-chronological age factors, self-perceived driving abilities, and autonomous vehicle acceptance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 178 (2022), 106850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106850
[34]
Earl W. Huff, Natalie DellaMaria, Brianna Posadas, and Julian Brinkley. 2019. Am I Too Old to Drive? Opinions of Older Adults on Self-Driving Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353801
[35]
Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC). 2018. What is Inclusive Design. Retrieved June 2, 2023 from https://legacy.idrc.ocadu.ca/about-the-idrc/49-resources/online-resources/articles-and-papers/443-whatisinclusivedesign.
[36]
Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
[37]
Shahedul Huq Khandkar. 2009. Open coding. University of Calgary. https://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/ saul/wiki/uploads/CPSC681/open-coding.pdf
[38]
Frank Knoefel, Bruce Wallace, Rafik Goubran, Iman Sabra, and Shawn Marshall. 2019. Semi-autonomous vehicles as a cognitive assistive device for older adults. Geriatrics 4, 4 (2019), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics4040063
[39]
Moritz Körber. 2019. Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13–30.
[40]
Li Na Lee, Mi Jeong Kim, and Won Ju Hwang. 2019. Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies to Promote Wellbeing in Older Adults. Applied Sciences 9, 17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173556
[41]
Young S. Lee, Shirley Chaysinh, Santosh Basapur, Crysta J. Metcalf, and Hiren Mandalia. 2012. Active Aging in Community Centers and ICT Design Implications. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317981
[42]
Stephen Lindsay, Daniel Jackson, Guy Schofield, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Engaging Older People Using Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1199–1208. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208570
[43]
Todd Litman. 2015. Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning. Technical Report. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108384
[44]
Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, and Ehud Sharlin. 2018. Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174003
[45]
Michael A. Nees, Benji Helbein, and Anna Porter. 2016. Speech Auditory Alerts Promote Memory for Alerted Events in a Video-Simulated Self-Driving Car Ride. Human Factors 58, 3 (2016), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816629279
[46]
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2020. World Population Ageing 2019. UN-ilibrary. https://doi.org/10.18356/6a8968ef-en
[47]
Luis Oliveira, Jacob Luton, Sumeet Iyer, Chris Burns, Alexandros Mouzakitis, Paul Jennings, and Stewart Birrell. 2018. Evaluating How Interfaces Influence the User Interaction with Fully Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239065
[48]
Qijia Peng, Yanbin Wu, Nan Qie, and Sunao Iwaki. 2022. Age-related effects of executive function on takeover performance in automated driving. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (2022), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08522-4
[49]
Rebecca J Riley, Sandy Burgener, and Kathleen C Buckwalter. 2014. Anxiety and stigma in dementia: a threat to aging in place. Nursing Clinics 49, 2 (2014), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2014.02.008
[50]
Peter A. M. Ruijten, Jacques M. B. Terken, and Sanjeev N. Chandramouli. 2018. Enhancing Trust in Autonomous Vehicles through Intelligent User Interfaces That Mimic Human Behavior. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2040062
[51]
Benjamin S. Alpers, Kali Cornn, Lauren E. Feitzinger, Usman Khaliq, So Yeon Park, Bardia Beigi, Daniel Joseph Hills-Bunnell, Trevor Hyman, Kaustubh Deshpande, Rieko Yajima, Larry Leifer, and Lauren Aquino Shluzas. 2020. Capturing Passenger Experience in a Ride-Sharing Autonomous Vehicle: The Role of Digital Assistants in User Interface Design. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410639
[52]
Dimitrios Saredakis, Ancret Szpak, Brandon Birckhead, Hannah AD Keage, Albert Rizzo, and Tobias Loetscher. 2020. Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in human neuroscience 14 (2020), 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096
[53]
Kristin E. Schaefer and Edward R. Straub. 2016. Will passengers trust driverless vehicles? Removing the steering wheel and pedals. In 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA). 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2016.7497804
[54]
Brandon Schoettle and Michael Sivak. 2014. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. Technical Report. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute. https://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf
[55]
Alexa L Siegfried, Alycia Bayne, Laurie F Beck, and Katherine Freund. 2021. Older adult willingness to use fully autonomous vehicle (FAV) ride sharing. Geriatrics 6, 2 (2021), 47.
[56]
Julian Specht, Helene Schroeder, Karsten Krakow, Günter Meinhardt, Barbara Stegmann, and Bozana Meinhardt-Injac. 2021. Acceptance of immersive head-mounted display virtual reality in stroke patients. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 4 (2021), 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100141
[57]
Jean Toner. 2009. Small is not too small: Reflections concerning the validity of very small focus groups (VSFGs). Qualitative Social Work 8, 2 (2009), 179–192.
[58]
Eleftheria Vaportzis, Maria Giatsi Clausen, and Alan J. Gow. 2017. Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687
[59]
Tamara von Sawitzky, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Joseph L. Gabbard. 2019. Increasing Trust in Fully Automated Driving: Route Indication on an Augmented Reality Head-up Display. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Palermo, Italy) (PerDis ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324947
[60]
Mikael Wiberg and Erik Stolterman. 2014. What Makes a Prototype Novel? A Knowledge Contribution Concern for Interaction Design Research. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (Helsinki, Finland) (NordiCHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639487
[61]
Philipp Wintersberger, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Tamara von Sawitzky. 2019. Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality. Presence 27, 1 (2019), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00320
[62]
Kenneth W Woodhouse, Hilary Wynne, Shelagh Baillie, OFW James, and MD Rawlins. 1988. Who are the frail elderly?, 505-506 pages.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Comprehensive Review of Trustworthy, Ethical, and Explainable Computer Vision Advancements in Online Social MediaGlobal Perspectives on the Applications of Computer Vision in Cybersecurity10.4018/978-1-6684-8127-1.ch001(1-46)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • (2024)From Skepticism to Acceptance: On the Dynamics of Elderly Engagement with Mixed RealityProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3670666(67-82)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2024)“Shotitwo First!”: Unraveling Global South Women’s Challenges in Public Transport to Inform Autonomous Vehicle DesignProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661553(3193-3209)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Designing Inclusive Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles for Older Passengers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 2023
    2717 pages
    ISBN:9781450398930
    DOI:10.1145/3563657
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 July 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Older adults
    2. autonomous vehicles
    3. passengers

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    DIS '23
    Sponsor:
    DIS '23: Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 10 - 14, 2023
    PA, Pittsburgh, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '25
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 5 - 9, 2025
    Funchal , Portugal

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)210
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)52
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Comprehensive Review of Trustworthy, Ethical, and Explainable Computer Vision Advancements in Online Social MediaGlobal Perspectives on the Applications of Computer Vision in Cybersecurity10.4018/978-1-6684-8127-1.ch001(1-46)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
    • (2024)From Skepticism to Acceptance: On the Dynamics of Elderly Engagement with Mixed RealityProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3670666(67-82)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
    • (2024)“Shotitwo First!”: Unraveling Global South Women’s Challenges in Public Transport to Inform Autonomous Vehicle DesignProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661553(3193-3209)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Introducing AV-Sketch: An Immersive Participatory Design Tool for Automated Vehicle — Passenger InteractionProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675705(83-93)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Podscape: Exploring the Comfort Level with Pods in Pedestrian Spaces through Immersive SimulationExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650776(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media