skip to main content
chapter

Interaction in Social Space

Published:03 November 2022Publication History
First page image

References

  1. E. André, T. Rist, S. van Mulken, M. Klesen, and S. Baldes. 2000. The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill (Eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 220–255. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Argyle and J. Dean. 1965. Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28, 3, 289–304. https://hrproxy.hir.is:2254/stable/2786027. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. N. Badler. 1997. Real-time virtual humans. In Proceedings of The Fifth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications. IEEE, 4–13. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. N. Badler, R. Bindiganavale, J. Bourne, M. Palmer, J. Shi, and W. Schuler. 2000. A parameterized action representation for virtual human agents. In Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, 256–284. https://repository.upenn.edu/hms/195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. N. Bailenson, J. Blascovich, A. C. Beall, and J. M. Loomis. 2003. Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 7, 819–833. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Bönsch, S. Radke, H. Overath, L. Asché, J. Ehret, T. Vierjahn, U. Habel, and T. Kuhlen. 2018. Social VR: How personal space is affected by virtual agents’ emotions. In IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 199–206. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Cafaro, R. Gaito, and H. H. Vilhjálmsson. 2009. Animating idle gaze in public places. In Z. Ruttkay, M. Kipp, A. Nijholt, and H. H. Vilhjálmsson (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 5773: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 250–256. ISBN 978-3-642-04380-2. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Cafaro, H. Vilhjálmsson, T. Bickmore, D. Heylen, and C. Pelachaud. 2014. Representing communicative functions in SAIBA with a unified function markup language. In T. Bickmore, S. Marsella, and C. Sidner (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 8637: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham, 81–94. ISBN 978-3-319-09766-4. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Cafaro, B. Ravenet, M. Ochs, H. H. Vilhjálmsson, and C. Pelachaud. 2016. The effects of interpersonal attitude of a group of agents on user’s presence and proxemics behavior. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 6, 2, 12:1–12:33. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. Carstensdottir, K. Gudmundsdottir, G. Valgardsson, and H. Vilhjalmsson. 2011. Where to sit? The study and implementation of seat selection in public places. In H. H. Vilhjálmsson, S. Kopp, S. Marsella, and K. R. Thórisson (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 6895: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 48–54. ISBN 978-3-642-23974-8. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. S. Cary. 1978. The role of gaze in the initiation of conversation. Soc. Psychol. 41, 3, 269–271. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Cassell and H. Vilhjalmsson. 1999. Fully embodied conversational avatars: Making communicative behaviors autonomous. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 2, 1, 45–64. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Cassell, C. Pelachaud, N. Badler, M. Steedman, B. Achorn, T. Becket, B. Douville, S. Prevost, and M. Stone. 1994. Animated conversation: Rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture and spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM, 413–420. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Cassell, T. Bickmore, M. Billinghurst, L. Campbell, K. Chang, H. Vilhjalmsson, and H. Yan. 1999. Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’99). ACM, 520–527. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Cassell, T. Bickmore, L. Campbell, H. Vilhjalmsson, and H. Yan. 2000a. Human conversation as a system framework: Designing embodied conversational agents. In Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 29–63. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill (Eds.). 2000b. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. Charalampous, I. Kostavelis, and A. Gasteratos. 2017. Recent trends in social aware robot navigation: A survey. Robot. Auton. Syst. 93, 85–104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889016302287. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Collett and P. Marsh. 1981. Patterns of public behaviour: Collision avoidance on a pedestrian crossing. In A. Kendon, T. A. Sebeok, and J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), Nonverbal Communication, Interaction, and Gesture. Approaches to Semiotics, Mouton Publishers, The Hague, 199–217. ISBN 90-279-3489-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Diamanti and H. H. Vilhjalmsson. 2021. Social crowd simulation: The challenge of fragmentation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Modeling and Animating Realistic Crowds and Humans (MARCH). IEEE, Online. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Garau, M. Slater, D.-P. Pertaub, and S. Razzaque. 2005. The responses of people to virtual humans in an immersive virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 14, 1, 104–116. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. E. Goffman. 1963. Behavior in Public Places; Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. The Free Press, New York, NY. ISBN 978-0-02-911940-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. E. Goffman. 1974. Frame Analyses: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Number Book, Whole. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E. T. Hall. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. Helbing and P. Molnár. 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51, 5, 4282–4286. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. P. Holthaus and S. Wachsmuth. 2012. Active peripersonal space for more intuitive HRI. In 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012). IEEE, 508–513. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Y. Huang and M. Kallmann. 2016. Planning motions and placements for virtual demonstrators. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 22, 5, 1568–1579. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. Jan and D. R. Traum. 2005. Dialog simulation for background characters. In T. Panayiotopoulos, J. Gratch, R. Aylett, D. Ballin, P. Olivier, and T. Rist (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 3661: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 65–74. ISBN 978-3-540-28739-1. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. D. Jan and D. R. Traum. 2007. Dynamic movement and positioning of embodied agents in multiparty conversations. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’07). ACM, New York, NY, 1–3. ISBN 978-81-904262-7-5. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. W. L. Johnson, S. Marsella, and H. Vilhjalmsson. 2004. The DARWARS Tactical Language Training System. In Proceedings of the 26th Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC). SSA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. N. Karimaghalou, U. Bernardet, and S. DiPaola. 2014. A model for social spatial behavior in virtual characters. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 25, 3–4, 505–517. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. A. Kendon. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Studies in International Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. ISBN 0-521-38938-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. A. Kendon, T. A. Sebeok, and J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.). 1981. Nonverbal Communication, Interaction, and Gesture. Approaches to Semiotics. Mouton Publishers, The Hague. ISBN 90-279-3489-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. J. Kolkmeier, J. Vroon, and D. Heylen. 2016. Interacting with virtual agents in shared space: Single and joint effects of gaze and proxemics. In D. Traum, W. Swartout, P. Khooshabeh, S. Kopp, S. Scherer, and A. Leuski (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 10011: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham, 1–14. ISBN 978-3-319-47665-0. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. S. Kopp and I. Wachsmuth. 2004. Synthesizing multimodal utterances for conversational agents. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 15, 1, 39–52. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. S. Kopp, B. Krenn, S. Marsella, A. N. Marshall, C. Pelachaud, H. Pirker, K. Thorisson, and H. Vilhjalmsson. 2006. Towards a common framework for multimodal generation: The Behavior Markup Language. Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 4133: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 205–217. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. M. Kyriakou, X. Pan, and Y. Chrysanthou. 2017. Interaction with virtual crowd in immersive and semi-immersive virtual reality systems. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 28, 5, e1729. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. S. Ólafsson, B. Bédi, H. E. ErlaHelgdóttir, B. Arnbjörnsdóttir, and H. HögniVilhjálmsson. 2015. Starting a conversation with strangers in virtual Reykjavik: Explicit announcement of presence. In Proceedings from the 3rd European Symposium on Multimodal Communication. Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet, 62–68. ISBN 1650-3740.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. H. Laga and T. Amaoka. 2009. Modeling the spatial behavior of virtual agents in groups for non-verbal communication in virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Universal Communication Symposium on IUCS’09. ACM Press, 154–159. ISBN 978-1-60558-641-0. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. C. Lester, J. L. Voerman, S. G. Towns, and C. B. Callaway. 1999. Deictic believability: Coordinated gesture, locomotion, and speech in lifelike pedagogical agents. Appl. Artif. Intell. 13, 4–5, 383–414. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. J. C. Lester, S. G. Towns, C. B. Callaway, J. L. Voerman, and P. J. FitzGerald. 2000. Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill (Eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, 123–154. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. J. Li. 2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 77, 23–37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107158191500004X. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. J. Llobera, B. Spanlang, G. Ruffini, and M. Slater. 2010. Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 8, 1, 3:1–3:12. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. C. Mavrogiannis, F. Baldini, A. Wang, D. Zhao, P. Trautman, A. Steinfeld, and J. Oh. 2021. Core challenges of social robot navigation: A survey. arXiv:2103.05668 [cs]. DOI: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05668.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. S. Narang, A. Best, T. Randhavane, A. Shapiro, and D. Manocha. 2016. PedVR: Simulating gaze-based interactions between a real user and virtual crowds. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST’16, ACM, New York, NY, 91–100. ISBN 978-1-4503-4491-3. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. N. Nguyen and I. Wachsmuth. 2011. From body space to interaction space: Modeling spatial cooperation for virtual humans. In The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems—Volume 3, AAMAS’11. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1047–1054. ISBN 978-0-9826571-7-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. R. Niewiadomski, E. Bevacqua, M. Mancini, and C. Pelachaud. 2009. Greta: An interactive expressive ECA system. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems—Volume 2. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, Richland, SC, 1399–1400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. M. Obaid, I. Damian, F. Kistler, B. Endrass, J. Wagner, and E. André. 2012. Cultural behaviors of virtual agents in an augmented reality environment. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA’12, Vol. 7502: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 412–418. ISBN 978-3-642-33196-1. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. C. Oliva and H. H. Vilhjálmsson. 2014. Prediction in social path following. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Motion in Games, MIG’14. ACM, New York, NY, 103–108. ISBN 978-1-4503-2623-0. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. E. Padilha and J. Carletta. 2002. A simulation of small group discussion. In 6th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (EDILOG 2002). https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/a-simulation-of-small-group-discussion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. C. Pedica and H. H. Vilhjálmsson. 2008. Social perception and steering for online avatars. In H. Prendinger, J. C. Lester, and M. Ishizuka (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA 2008, Vol. 5208: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 104–116. ISBN 978-3-540-85482-1. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iva/iva2008.html#PedicaV08. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. C. Pedica and H. H. Vilhjálmsson. 2012. Lifelike interactive characters with behavior trees for social territorial intelligence. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Posters, SIGGRAPH’12. ACM, New York, NY, 32:1. ISBN 978-1-4503-1682-8. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. C. Pedica, H. H. Vilhjálmsson, and M. Lárusdóttir. 2010. Avatars in conversation: The importance of simulating territorial behavior. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA 2010, Vol. 6356: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 336–342. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. N. Pelechano, J. M. Allbeck, and N. I. Badler. 2007. Controlling individual agents in high-density crowd simulation. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, SCA’07. Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 99–108. ISBN 978-1-59593-624-0. https://repository.upenn.edu/hms/210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. N. Pelechano Gómez, C. Stocker, J. Allbeck, and N. Badler. 2007. Feeling crowded? Exploring presence in virtual crowds. In Proceedings of PRESENCE 2007. UPCommons, 373–376. https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/15704. Accepted: 2012-04-04T08:52:07Z.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. C. Peters and C. Ennis. 2009. Modeling groups of plausible virtual pedestrians. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 29, 4, 54–63. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. M. Popelová, M. Bída, C. Brom, J. Gemrot, and J. Tomek. 2011. When a couple goes together: Walk along steering. In J. M. Allbeck and P. Faloutsos (Eds.), Motion in Games, Vol. 7060: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 278–289. ISBN 978-3-642-25089-7. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. T. Randhavane, A. Bera, and D. Manocha. 2017. F2FCrowds: Planning agent movements to enable face-to-face interactions. Presence. 26, 2, 228–246. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Z. Ren, P. Charalambous, J. Bruneau, Q. Peng, and J. Pettré. 2017. Group modeling: A unified velocity-based approach. Comput. Graph. Forum 36, 8, 45–56. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. C. W. Reynolds. August. 1987. Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH’87. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 25–34. ISBN 978-0-89791-227-3. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. C. W. Reynolds. 1999. Steering Behaviors for Autonomous Characters. Miller Freeman Game Group, San Jose, CA, 763–782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. J. Rickel and W. L. Johnson. 1999. Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: Perception, cognition, and motor control. Appl. Artif. Intell. 13, 4–5, 343–382. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. J. Rickel and W. L. Johnson. 2000. Task-oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds. In Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 122. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. J. Rios-Martinez, A. Spalanzani, and C. Laugier. 2015. From proxemics theory to socially-aware navigation: A survey. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 2, 137–153. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. F. A. Rojas and H. S. Yang. 2013. Immersive human-in-the-loop HMD evaluation of dynamic group behavior in a pedestrian crowd simulation that uses group agent-based steering. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry (VRCAI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 31–40. ISBN 978-1-4503-2590-5. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. F. A. Rojas, H. S. Yang, and F. M. Tarnogol. 2014. Safe navigation of pedestrians in social groups in a virtual urban environment. In 2014 International Conference on Cyberworlds. IEEE, 31–38. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. F. Rojas, F. Tarnogol, and H. S. Yang. 2016. Dynamic social formations of pedestrian groups navigating and using public transportation in a virtual city. Vis. Comput. 32, 3, 335–345. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. S. Satake, T. Kanda, D. F. Glas, M. Imai, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita. 2009. How to approach humans?: Strategies for social robots to initiate interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. ACM, 109–116. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. A. E. Scheflen. 1975. Micro-territories in human interaction. In A. Kendon (Ed.), Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction, World Anthropology. Mouton Publishers, 159–174. ISBN 978-3-11-090764-3. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110907643.159/html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. A. E. Scheflen. 1976. Human Territories: How We Behave in Space and Time. Prentice-Hall, Boston, MA. ISBN 1-59593-364-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. W. Shao and D. Terzopoulos. 2005. Autonomous pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA’05). ACM, New York, NY, 19–28. ISBN 978-1-59593-198-6. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. A. Shapiro. 2011. Building a character animation system. In Motion in Games, MIG 2011, Vol. 7060: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 98–109. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. J. Shi, T. Smith, J. Granieri, and N. Badler. 1999. Smart avatars in JackMOO. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316). IEEE, 156–163. ISBN 978-0-7695-0093-5. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. L. Sun, A. Shoulson, P. Huang, N. Nelson, W. Qin, A. Nenkova, and N. I. Badler. 2012. Animating synthetic dyadic conversations with variations based on context and agent attributes. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 23, 1, 17–32. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. A. Thordarson and H. H. Vilhjálmsson. 2019. SoCueVR: Virtual reality game for social cue detection training. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA’19). ACM, New York, NY, 46–48. ISBN 978-1-4503-6672-4. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. K. Thorisson. 1997. Gandalf: An embodied humanoid capable of real-time multimodal dialogue with people. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, AGENTS ’97. ACM, 536–537. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. P. R. Thrainsson, A. L. Petursson, and H. H. Vilhjálmsson. 2011. Dynamic planning for agents in games using social norms and emotions. In H. H. Vilhjálmsson, S. Kopp, S. Marsella, and K. R. Thórisson (Eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 6895: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 473–474. ISBN 978-3-642-23974-8. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. J. van den Berg, M. Lin, and D. Manocha. 2008. Reciprocal velocity obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 1928–1935. ISSN: 1050-4729. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. D. Veutgen, M. Massetti, J. Rossi, L. Veroli, A. Ásgeirsdóttir, G. Baldursdóttir, S. Gissurardóttir, G. Gudmundsson, T. Sigurdardóttir, V. Laenen, and H. H. Vilhjálmsson. 2018. Interpreting social commitment in a simulated theater. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA’18). ACM, New York, NY, 289–294. ISBN 978-1-4503-6013-5. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. H. H. Vilhjalmsson. 1996. Autonomous communicative behaviors in avatars (Abstract). In Proceedings of Lifelike Computer Characters’96. Snowbird, Utah, 49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. H. Vilhjalmsson, C. Merchant, and P. Samtani. 2007. Social puppets: Towards modular social animation for agents and avatars. In D. Schuler (Ed.), Online Communities and Social Computing, Vol. 4564: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 192–201. ISBN 978-3-540-73257-0. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. H. Vilhjalmsson, E. Björgvinsson, H. Helgadottir, K. V. Kristinsson, S. Ólafsson, A. Cafaro, N. Kramer, J. Braier, P. Wegge, S. Youn, C. Pedica, B. Arnbjörnsdóttir, and B. Bédi. 2014. Social Gatherings in Virtual Reykjavik (Demo and Poster). Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. H. H. Vilhjálmsson and J. Cassell. 1998. Bodychat: Autonomous communicative behaviors in avatars. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, AGENTS’98. ACM, New York, NY, 269–276. ISBN 0-89791-983-1. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. J. Zhao and N. I. Badler. 1994. Inverse kinematics positioning using nonlinear programming for highly articulated figures. ACM Trans. Graph. 13, 4, 313–336. DOI: .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interaction in Social Space
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image ACM Books
                The Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents: 20 years of Research on Embodied Conversational Agents, Intelligent Virtual Agents, and Social Robotics Volume 2: Interactivity, Platforms, Application
                October 2022
                710 pages
                ISBN:9781450398961
                DOI:10.1145/3563659

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 3 November 2022

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • chapter

                Appears In

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader