Moojan Ghafurian
John Muñoz
Jesse Hoey
- J. Abdi, A. Al-Hindawi, T. Ng, and M. P. Vizcaychipi. 2018. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open 8, 2, e018815. DOI: .Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- H. Abdollahi, A. Mollahosseini, J. T. Lane, and M. H. Mahoor. 2017. A pilot study on using an intelligent life-like robot as a companion for elderly individuals with dementia and depression. In 2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids). IEEE, 541–546. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Amirabdollahian, R. op den Akker, S. Bedaf, R. Bormann, H. Draper, V. Evers, J. G. Pérez, G. J. Gelderblom, C. G. Ruiz, D. Hewson, and N. Hu. 2013. Assistive technology design and development for acceptable robotics companions for ageing years. Paladyn J. Behav. Robot. 4, 2, 94–112. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. R. Banks, L. M. Willoughby, and W. A. Banks. 2008. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: Use of robotic versus living dogs. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 9, 3, 173–177. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Boger and K. Mercer. 2017. Technology for fostering intergenerational connectivity: Scoping review protocol. Syst. Rev. 6, 1, 250. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. N. Boger. 2014. Transdisciplinary Development of Intelligent Assistive Technologies to Support Wellbeing. Ph.D. thesis. Ulster University.Google Scholar
- C. Breazeal, K. Dautenhahn, and T. Kanda. 2016. Social robotics. In Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer, Cham, 1935–1972. ISBN 978-3-319-32552-1. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Broadbent, R. Stafford, and B. MacDonald. 2009. Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. Int. J. Social Robot. 1, 4, 319. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Cabrita, H. op den Akker, M. Tabak, H. J. Hermens, and M. M. Vollenbroek-Hutten. 2018. Persuasive technology to support active and healthy ageing: An exploration of past, present, and future. J. Biomed. Inform. 84, 17–30. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. A. Calvo, S. D’Mello, J. M. Gratch, and A. Kappas. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing. Oxford University Press, USA. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Chan and G. Nejat. 2010. Promoting engagement in cognitively stimulating activities using an intelligent socially assistive robot. In 2010 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. IEEE, 533–538. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Chowanda, M. Flintham, P. Blanchfield, and M. Valstar. 2016. Playing with social and emotional game companions. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Vol. 10011: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 85–95. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Daly Lynn, J. Rondón-Sulbarán, E. Quinn, A. Ryan, B. McCormack, and S. Martin. 2019. A systematic review of electronic assistive technology within supporting living environments for people with dementia. Dementia 18, 7–8, 2371–2435. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Dautenhahn. 1995. Getting to know each other—Artificial social intelligence for autonomous robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 16, 2–4, 333–356. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Dautenhahn. 1997. I could be you: The phenomenological dimension of social understanding. Cybern. Syst. 28, 5, 417–453. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Dautenhahn. 2007. Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 362, 1480, 679–704. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Dautenhahn. 2014. Human–robot interaction. In C. Ghauoi (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Human–Computer Interaction. Interaction Design Foundation.Google Scholar
- Dementia Australia. 2020. Dementia Language Guidelines. Retrieved May 11, 2020, from https://www.dementia.org.au/resources/dementia-language-guidelines.Google Scholar
- B. De Schutter. 2017. Gerontoludic design: Extending the MDA framework to facilitate meaningful play for older adults. Int. J. Gaming Comput.-Mediat. Simul. 9, 1, 45–60. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Derek, J. Chan, and G. Nejat. 2012. A socially assistive robot for meal-time cognitive interventions. J. Med. Device. 6, 1. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Dix, A. J. Dix, J. Finlay, G. D. Abowd, and R. Beale. 2003. Human–Computer Interaction. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- A. Drachen, P. Mirza-Babaei, and L. E. Nacke. 2018. Games User Research. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- M. Dragone, J. Saunders, and K. Dautenhahn. 2015. On the integration of adaptive and interactive robotic smart spaces. Paladyn J. Behav. Robot. 6, 1, 165–179. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Duque, G. Fonseca, H. Vieira, G. Gontijo, and L. Ishitani. 2019. A systematic literature review on user centered design and participatory design with older people. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–11. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Fasola and M. Mataric. 2011. Comparing Physical and Virtual Embodiment in a Socially Assistive Robot Exercise Coach for the Elderly. Technical Report CRES-11-003. Center Robotics and Embedded Systems. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
- T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and autonomous systems 42(3–4), 143–166. Chicago.Google Scholar
- J. Forlizzi, C. DiSalvo, and F. Gemperle. 2004. Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19, 1–2, 25–59. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Galliers, S. Wilson, A. Roper, N. Cocks, J. Marshall, S. Muscroft, and T. Pring. 2012. Words are not enough: Empowering people with aphasia in the design process. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers-Vol. 1. ACM, 51–60. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Gamito, J. Oliveira, C. Coelho, D. Morais, P. Lopes, J. Pacheco, R. Brito, F. Soares, N. Santos, and A. F. Barata. 2017. Cognitive training on stroke patients via virtual reality-based serious games. Disabil. Rehabil. 39, 4, 385–388. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. I. García-Betances, M. T. Arredondo Waldmeyer, G. Fico, and M. F. Cabrera-Umpiérrez. 2015. A succinct overview of virtual reality technology use in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, 80. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Ghafurian, N. Budnarain, and J. Hoey. 2019. Role of emotions in perception of humanness of virtual agents. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS ’19. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1979–1981. ISBN 9781450363099.Google Scholar
- M. Ghafurian, N. Budnarain, and J. Hoey. 2021a. Improving Humanness of Virtual Agents and Users’ Cooperation through Emotions. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Ghafurian, C. Ellard, and K. Dautenhahn. 2021b. Social companion robots to reduce isolation: a perception change due to covid-19. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham, 43–63.Google Scholar
- M. Ghafurian, J. Hoey, and K. Dautenhahn. 2021c. Social robots for the care of persons with dementia: A systematic review. ACM Trans. Hum-Robot Interact. 10, 4, 1–31. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Gnambs and M. Appel. 2019. Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 53–61. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. E. Harris. 2019. Epidemiology of Chronic Disease: Global Perspectives. Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
- M. Heerink, B. Kröse, V. Evers, and B. Wielinga. 2010. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 4, 361–375. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Hegel, C. Muhl, B. Wrede, M. Hielscher-Fastabend, and G. Sagerer. 2009. Understanding social robots. In 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. IEEE, 169–174. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Hubbard, M. G. Downs, and S. Tester. 2003. Including older people with dementia in research: Challenges and strategies. Aging Ment. Health 7, 5, 351–362. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Jennings. 2000. Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce websites. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research. ACM, 77–85. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Kachouie, S. Sedighadeli, R. Khosla, and M.-T. Chu. 2014. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed-method systematic literature review. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30, 5, 369–393. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. G. Kang, D. F. Mahoney, H. Hoenig, V. A. Hirth, P. Bonato, I. Hajjar, L. A. Lipsitz, C. for the Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology Working Group on Advanced Approaches to Physiologic Monitoring for the Aged. 2010. In situ monitoring of health in older adults: Technologies and issues. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 58, 8, 1579–1586. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. L. Kappen, P. Mirza-Babaei, and L. E. Nacke. 2019. Older adults’ physical activity and exergames: A systematic review. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 35, 2, 140–167. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Khosla, M.-T. Chu, R. Kachouie, K. Yamada, F. Yoshihiro, and T. Yamaguchi. 2012. Interactive multimodal social robot for improving quality of care of elderly in Australian nursing homes. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1173–1176. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Khosla, K. Nguyen, and M.-T. Chu. 2014. Assistive robot enabled service architecture to support home-based dementia care. In 2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications. IEEE, 73–80. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Kilteni, R. Groten, and M. Slater. 2012. The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 21, 4, 373–387. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. König, A. Malhotra, J. Hoey, and L. E. Francis. 2016. Designing personalized prompts for a virtual assistant to support elderly care home residents. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies Healthcare. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 278–282.Google Scholar
- A. Konig, L. E. Francis, J. Joshi, J. M. Robillard, and J. Hoey. 2017. Qualitative study of affective identities in dementia patients for the design of cognitive assistive technologies. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 4. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Konig, L. E. Francis, and J. Hoey. 2018. Emotionally adaptive technologies for people with dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 7, 208. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. M. Lau, J. H. Smit, T. M. Fleming, and H. Riper. 2017. Serious games for mental health: Are they accessible, feasible, and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychiatry 7, 209. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Lazar, J. L. Feuston, C. Edasis, and A. M. Piper. 2018. Making as expression: Informing design with people with complex communication needs through art therapy. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–16. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. M. Lee, Y. Jung, J. Kim, and S. R. Kim. 2006. Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64, 10, 962–973. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Leuty, J. Boger, L. Young, J. Hoey, and A. Mihailidis. 2013. Engaging older adults with dementia in creative occupations using artificially intelligent assistive technology. Assist. Technol. 25, 2, 72–79. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Li. 2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 77, 23–37. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Li, M. Erdt, L. Chen, Y. Cao, S.-Q. Lee, and Y.-L. Theng. 2018. The social effects of exergames on older adults: Systematic review and metric analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, 6, e10486. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Malhotra, L. Yu, T. Schroeder, and J. Hoey. 2015. An exploratory study into the use of an emotionally aware cognitive assistant. In Workshops at the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Association for the Advancement of Artificial8 Intelligence.Google Scholar
- A. Mannion, S. Summerville, E. Barrett, M. Burke, A. Santorelli, C. Kruschke, H. Felzmann, T. Kovacic, K. Murphy, D. Casey, Whelan S. A. 2019. Introducing the social robot MARIO to people living with dementia in long term residential care: Reflections. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12, 535–547. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Martín, C. Agüero, J. M. Cañas, G. Abella, R. Benítez, S. Rivero, M. Valenti, and P. Martínez-Martín. 2013. Robots in therapy for dementia patients. J. Phys. Agents 7, 1, 48–55. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. J. Matarić and B. Scassellati. 2016. Socially assistive robotics. In Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer, 1973–1994. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. R. Michael and S. L. Chen. 2005. Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train, and Inform. Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade.Google Scholar
- A. Mihailidis, J. Boger, J. Hoey, and T. Jiancaro. 2011. Zero effort technologies: Considerations, challenges, and use in health, wellness, and rehabilitation. Synth. Lect. Assist. Rehabil. Health-Preserving Technol. 1, 2, 1–94. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Moyle, C. Jones, T. Dwan, T. Ownsworth, and B. Sung. 2018. Using telepresence for social connection: Views of older people with dementia, families, and health professionals from a mixed methods pilot study. Aging Ment. Health 23, 12, 1643–1650. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Mulvenna, A. Hutton, V. Coates, S. Martin, S. Todd, R. Bond, and A. Moorhead. 2017. Views of caregivers on the ethics of assistive technology used for home surveillance of people living with dementia. Neuroethics 10, 2, 255–266. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. E. Muñoz, A. Goncalves, É. Rúbio Gouveia, M. S. Cameirao, and S. Bermudez i Badia. 2019. Lessons learned from gamifying functional fitness training through human-centered design methods in older adults. Games Health J. 8, 6, 387–406. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Norman. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- D. A. Norman. 2005. Robots in the home: What might they do? Interactions 12, 2, 65. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Nouchi, Y. Taki, H. Takeuchi, H. Hashizume, Y. Akitsuki, Y. Shigemune,A. Sekiguchi, Y. Kotozaki, T. Tsukiura, Y. Yomogida, and Kawashima R. 2012. Brain training game improves executive functions and processing speed in the elderly: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 7, 1, e29676. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. L. O’Brien and E. G. Toms. 2008. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59, 6, 938–955. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Odetti, G. Anerdi, M. P. Barbieri, D. Mazzei, E. Rizza, P. Dario, G. Rodriguez, and S. Micera. 2007. Preliminary experiments on the acceptability of animaloid companion robots by older people with early dementia. In 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 1816–1819. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Paiva, I. Leite, H. Boukricha, and I. Wachsmuth. 2017. Empathy in virtual agents and robots: A survey. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 7, 3, 1–40. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Perugia, M. D. Doladeras, A. C. Mallofré, M. Rauterberg, and E. Barakova. 2017. Modelling engagement in dementia through behaviour. Contribution for socially interactive robotics. In 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 1112–1117. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Pino, M. Boulay, F. Jouen, and A. S. Rigaud. 2015. “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, 141. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Pradhan, K. Mehta, and L. Findlater. 2018. “Accessibility came by accident”: Use of voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants by people with disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–13. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. P. Proença, C. Quaresma, and P. Vieira. 2018. Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation: A systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 13, 1, 95–100. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Pu, W. Moyle, C. Jones, and M. Todorovic. 2019. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist 59, 1, e37–e51. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Raïevsky and F. Michaud. 2009. Emotion generation based on a mismatch theory of emotions for situated agents. In Handbook of Research on Synthetic Emotions and Sociable Robotics: New Applications in Affective Computing and Artificial Intelligence. IGI Global, 247–266. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. M. Robillard and J. Hoey. 2018. Emotion and motivation in cognitive assistive technologies for dementia. Computer 51, 3, 24–34. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. M. Robillard, I. Cleland, J. Hoey, and C. D. Nugent. 2018. Ethical adoption: A new imperative in the development of technology for dementia. Alzheimers Dementia 14, 9, 1104–1113. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Rouaix, L. Retru-Chavastel, A.-S. Rigaud, C. Monnet, H. Lenoir, and M. Pino. 2017. Affective and engagement issues in the conception and assessment of a robot-assisted psychomotor therapy for persons with dementia. Front. Psychol. 8, 950. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sabanovic, M. P. Michalowski, and R. Simmons. 2006. Robots in the wild: Observing human–robot social interaction outside the lab. In 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006. IEEE, 596–601. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Šabanović, C. C. Bennett, W.-L. Chang, and L. Huber. 2013. PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 1–6. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Saez-Pons, D. S. Syrdal, and K. Dautenhahn. 2015. What has happened today? memory visualisation of a robot companion to assist user’s memory. J. Assist. Technol. 9, 4, 207–218. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Salem, G. Lakatos, F. Amirabdollahian, and K. Dautenhahn. 2015. Would you trust a (faulty) robot? Effects of error, task type and personality on human–robot cooperation and trust. In 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI). ACM, 141–148. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. B.-N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1, 5–18. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Saunders, D. S. Syrdal, K. L. Koay, N. Burke, and K. Dautenhahn. 2015. “Teachme–show me” —End-user personalization of a smart home and companionrobot. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 46, 1, 27–40. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sävenstedt, P.-O. Sandman, and K. Zingmark. 2006. The duality in using information and communication technology in elder care. J. Adv. Nurs. 56, 1, 17–25. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Shibata. 2012. Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proc. IEEE 100, 8, 2527–2538. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Shibata and K. Wada. 2011. Robot therapy: A new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly—A mini-review. Gerontology 57, 4, 378–386. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Shinozawa, F. Naya, J. Yamato, and K. Kogure. 2005. Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 62, 2, 267–279. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Shishehgar, D. Kerr, and J. Blake. 2018. A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people. Smart Health 7–8, 1–18. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Shishehgar, D. Kerr, and J. Blake. 2019. The effectiveness of various robotic technologies in assisting older adults. Health Informatics J. 25, 3, 892–918. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.-A. Smarr, A. Prakash, J. M. Beer, T. L. Mitzner, C. C. Kemp, and W. A. Rogers. 2012. Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 56, 1, 153–157. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.-A. Smarr, T. L. Mitzner, J. M. Beer, A. Prakash, T. L. Chen, C. C. Kemp, and W. A. Rogers. 2014. Domestic robots for older adults: Attitudes, preferences, and potential. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 2, 229–247. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. V. Smedegaard. 2019. Reframing the role of novelty within social HRI: From noise to information. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 411–420. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Springate, M. Atkinson, and K. Martin. 2008. Intergenerational Practice: A Review of the Literature. LGA Research Report F/SR262. National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- B. Stigall, J. Waycott, S. Baker, and K. Caine. 2019. Older adults’ perception and use of voice user interfaces: A preliminary review of the computing literature. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human–Computer-Interaction. ACM, 423–427. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Still and K. Crane. 2017. Fundamentals of User-Centered Design: A Practical Approach. CRC Press.Google Scholar
- S. Suijkerbuijk, H. H. Nap, L. Cornelisse, W. A. IJsselsteijn, Y. A. De Kort, and M. Minkman. 2019. Active involvement of people with dementia: A systematic review of studies developing supportive technologies. J. Alzheimers Dis. 69, 4, 1041–1065. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Suryani. 2013. Comparing case study and ethnography as qualitative research approaches. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI 5, 1. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, K. L. Koay, and W. C. Ho. 2014. Views from within a narrative: Evaluating long-term human–robot interaction in a naturalistic environment using open-ended scenarios. Cognit. Comput. 6, 4, 741–759. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, K. L. Koay, and W. C. Ho. 2015. Integrating constrained experiments in long-term human–robot interaction using task-and scenario-based prototyping. Inf. Soc. 31, 3, 265–283. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Tholander, M. Normark, and C. Rossitto. 2012. Understanding agency in interaction design materials. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2499–2508. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Vespa, D. M. Armstrong, and L. Medina. 2018. Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- K. Wada and T. Shibata. 2007. Robot therapy in a care house—Change of relationship among the residents and seal robot during a 2-month long study. In RO-MAN 2007—The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 107–112. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Saito, K. Sakamoto, and K. Tanie. 2005. Psychological and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2785–2790. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Walsh and A. Callan. 2011. Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: A case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing Int. 36, 1, 102–122. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. L. Walters, D. S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, and K. L. Koay. 2008. Avoiding the uncanny valley: Robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton. Robot. 24, 2, 159–178. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. L. Walters, M. Lohse, M. Hanheide, B. Wrede, D. S. Syrdal, K. L. Koay, A. Green, H. Hüttenrauch, K. Dautenhahn, G. Sagerer, and K. Severinson-Eklundh K. 2011. Evaluating the robot personality and verbal behavior of domestic robots using video-based studies. Adv. Robot. 25, 18, 2233–2254. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Wang, B. Subagdja, Y. Kang, A.-H. Tan, and D. Zhang. 2014. Towards intelligent caring agents for aging-in-place: Issues and challenges. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Human-like Intelligence (CIHLI). IEEE, 1–8. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. H. Wang, A. Sudhama, M. Begum, R. Huq, and A. Mihailidis. 2017. Robots to assist daily activities: Views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int. Psychogeriatr. 29, 1, 67–79. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Webster, C. Dixon, M. Fisher, M. Salem, J. Saunders, K. L. Koay, K. Dautenhahn, and J. Saez-Pons. 2015. Toward reliable autonomous robotic assistants through formal verification: A case study. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 46, 2, 186–196. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Whelan, K. Murphy, E. Barrett, C. Krusche, A. Santorelli, and D. Casey. 2018. Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by older adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: A literature review. Int. J. Social Robot. 10, 5, 643–668. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- World Health. 2018. Global health and aging.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO). 2019. Dementia: Fact Sheet No282. Accessed December 13, 2019.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO). 2020a. Health statistics and information systems: Proposed working definition of an older person in Africa for the MDS Projec. Accessed February 12, 2020.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO). 2020b. Disability: Assistive devices and technologies. Accessed February 12, 2020.Google Scholar
- W. Xu, H.-N. Liang, Z. Zhang, and N. Baghaei. 2020. Studying the effect of display type and viewing perspective on user experience in virtual reality exergames. Games Health J 405–414. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Zhang and D. Kaufman. 2016. Cognitive benefits of older adults’ digital gameplay: A critical review. Gerontechnology 15, 1, 3–16. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Zimmerman, J. Forlizzi, and S. Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 493–502. DOI: .Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Zulman, M. Kirch, K. Zheng, and L. C. An. 2011. Trust in the Internet as a health resource among older adults: Analysis of data from a nationally representative survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, 1, e19. DOI: .Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Socially Interactive Agents for Supporting Aging
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Engineering Socially Intelligent Personal Agents via Norms
AAMAS '17: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsThis thesis develops Arnor, an agent-oriented software engineering (AOSE) method to engineer social intelligence in personal agents. Arnor goes beyond traditional AOSE methods to engineer personal agents by systematically capturing interactions that ...
Social networking in the aging context
We examine senior citizens perceptions of Facebook with the help of in-depth interviews.Our interviews identify six motivations to use Facebook and six reasons to avoid using Facebook.Facebook can be a promising venue for inter-generational ...
Believable agents and intelligent story adaptation for interactive storytelling
TIDSE'06: Proceedings of the Third international conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and EntertainmentInteractive Narrative is an approach to interactive entertainment that enables the player to make decisions that directly affect the direction and/or outcome of the narrative experience being delivered by the computer system. Interactive narrative ...
Comments