skip to main content
10.1145/3563703.3596630acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Rapid, Iterative, and Remote (RIR) Method for Designing Translational Tools: Study Experience and Lessons Learned

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a rapid, iterative, and remote (RIR) approach as a collaborative method for combining designers’ feedback in creating translational tools by HCI researchers to make academic knowledge accessible to designers. RIR allows refining and validating the design of translational tools through exhaustive rapid iterations on several versions of tools. To demonstrate RIR, we present a study of translational design cards in the context of societal resilience with 14 participants. In the paper, we share our study experience, challenges, and lessons learned in conducting the RIR method. Reflecting on our experience, we provide recommendations on various aspects of the method, such as onboarding, activity design, card interactions, schedule management, data collection and analysis, and decision-making processes. We hope our study experience and recommendations open doors for researchers to use the RIR method for designing translational tools for diverse design spaces.

References

  1. Lucas Colusso, Cynthia L Bennett, Gary Hsieh, and Sean A Munson. 2017. Translational resources: Reducing the gap between academic research and HCI practice. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 957–968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lucas Colusso, Ridley Jones, Sean A Munson, and Gary Hsieh. 2019. A translational science model for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ying Deng, Alissa N Antle, and Carman Neustaedter. 2014. Tango cards: a card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 695–704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 541–550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anton Fedosov, Masako Kitazaki, William Odom, and Marc Langheinrich. 2019. Sharing economy design cards. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mafalda Samuelsson Gamboa and Sara Ljungblad. 2022. Designerly Ways of Knowing in HCI Education: A Case Study of a Peer Community-Based Studio. Frontiers in Computer Science (2022), 52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tom Gayler, Corina Sas, and Vaiva Kalnikaitė. 2021. Sensory probes: An exploratory design research method for Human-Food Interaction. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 666–682.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim Halskov and Peter Dalsgård. 2006. Inspiration card workshops. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems. 2–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Irni Eliana Khairuddin, Corina Sas, and Chris Speed. 2019. BlocKit: A physical kit for materializing and designing for Blockchain infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1449–1462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Susanne Kirchner, Jessica Schroeder, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2021. “They don’t always think about that”: Translational Needs in the Design of Personal Health Informatics Applications. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michael C Medlock, Dennis Wixon, Mark Terrano, Ramon Romero, and Bill Fulton. 2002. Using the RITE method to improve products: A definition and a case study. Usability Professionals Association 51 (2002), 1963813932–1562338474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Camille Nadal, Shane McCully, Kevin Doherty, Corina Sas, and Gavin Doherty. 2022. The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David J Roedl and Erik Stolterman. 2013. Design research at CHI and its applicability to design practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1951–1954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Josh Zak. 2020. Best Tools and Software for Conducting UX. https://miro.com/guides/ux-research/ux-toolsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Rapid, Iterative, and Remote (RIR) Method for Designing Translational Tools: Study Experience and Lessons Learned

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 2023
      296 pages
      ISBN:9781450398985
      DOI:10.1145/3563703

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 July 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)100
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format