skip to main content
10.1145/3564121.3564800acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaimlsystemsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Address Location Correction System for Q-commerce

Published:16 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hyperlocal e-commerce companies in India deliver food and groceries in around 20-40 minutes, and more recently, some companies focus on sub-ten-minute delivery targets. Such "instant" delivery platforms referred to as quick (q)-commerce onboard GPS locations of customer addresses along with their text addresses to enable Delivery Partners (DPs) navigate to the customer locations seamlessly. Inaccurate GPS locations lead to a breach of promises on delivery times for customers and order cancellations because the DPs may not be able to find the address easily or may not even navigate close to the actual address. As a first step towards correcting these inaccurate locations, in this work, we design a classifier to identify if the GPS location captured is incorrect using the text addresses. The classifier is trained in a self-supervised manner. We propose two strategies to generate the train set, one based on location perturbation using Gaussian noise and another based on swapping pairs of addresses in a dataset generated with accurate address locations. An ensemble of outputs of models trained on these two datasets give 84.5 % precision and 49 % recall in a large Indian city on our internal test set.

References

  1. T Ravindra Babu and Vishal Kakkar. 2017. Address Fraud: Monkey Typed Address Classification for e-Commerce Applications. In SIGIR Workshop on e-Commerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Abhranil Chatterjee, Janit Anjaria, Sourav Roy, Arnab Ganguli, and Krishanu Seal. 2016. SAGEL: smart address geocoding engine for supply-chain logistics. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Defense Mapping Agency Washington DC 2021. Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984: Its Definition and Relationships with Local Geodetic Systems. Second Edition. (2021). Retrieved July 10, 2021 from https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA280358Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, Xiaowei Xu, 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise.. In kdd, Vol. 96. 226–231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Abhinav Ganesan, Anubhav Gupta, and Jose Mathew. 2021. Mining points of interest via address embeddings: an unsupervised approach. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-based Recommendations, Geosocial Networks and Geoadvertising. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gustavo Niemeyer 2021. Geohash. (2021). Retrieved July 10, 2021 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeohashGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shreyas Mangalgi, Lakshya Kumar, and Ravindra Babu Tallamraju. 2020. Deep Contextual Embeddings for Address Classification in E-commerce. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03020(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Krista Merry and Pete Bettinger. 2019. Smartphone GPS accuracy study in an urban environment. PloS one 14, 7 (2019), e0219890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in neural information processing systems 26 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Vishal Srivastava, Priyam Tejaswin, Lucky Dhakad, Mohit Kumar, and Amar Dani. 2020. A Geocoding Framework Powered by Delivery Data. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 568–577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. TUG 2021. Geohash. (2021). Retrieved July 10, 2021 from https://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/geohash.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. TUG 2021. GeoPy. (2021). Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://geopy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. TUG 2022. Q-commerce. (2022). Retrieved June 22, 2022 from https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/quick-commerce-market-faces-some-fast-facts-8479241.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vedang A Waradpande, Petchetti Vinay Surya Prakash, Nikhil Jhaveri, and Shashank Agarwal. 2021. Predicting Completeness of Unstructured Shipping Addresses Using Ensemble Models. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Reddy, A. Ganesan, J. Mathew 2021. Using deep learning to detect dissonance between address text and location. (2021). Retrieved June 5, 2022 from https://bytes.swiggy.com/using-deep-learning-to-detect-dissonance-between-address-text-and-location-4b228bc2c3fbGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AIMLSystems '22: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI-ML Systems
    October 2022
    209 pages
    ISBN:9781450398473
    DOI:10.1145/3564121

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 May 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format