skip to main content
10.1145/3564533.3565805acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesweb3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Industrial Use-Case : AR for Manual Assembly in Industry

Published:02 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Augmented Reality (AR), part of Industry 4.0 concepts, is an emerging technology with a great potential in assisting humans in a wide range of industrial processes. Among various use-cases, AR has started to be used as a training tool in manual assembly, by enabling workers to access contextualized digital information overlaid in the physical world. However, very few AR solutions have been adopted so far in industrial sectors, mainly because of technical and acceptability issues, as well as the effort to create AR contents. In this paper we present an AR training system designed for and within the framework of manual assembly production. The proposed approach aims to find the right balance between usability, effectiveness, user acceptance and authoring efforts, to address significant industrial challenges and provide an AR training tool adapted to the shop floor context. We demonstrated the usability and effectiveness of the proposed AR system in multiple experiments and comparatively evaluated authoring efforts with the state-of-the-art. Overall, our proposal reported excellent usability scores and was almost unanimously preferred by the participants to the experiments. Authoring was almost twice as fast as the state-of-the-art while the error rate during training was zero, validating therefore the effectiveness of the system.

References

  1. 2019. Unity 2019.4.10. https://unity3d.com/unity/whats-new/2019.4.10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2019. Vuforia Expert Capture | PTC. https://www.ptc.com/en/products/vuforia/vuforia-expert-captureGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2020. Mixed Reality Toolkit | Microsoft Docs. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/mrtk-unity/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2021. Overview of Dynamics 365 Guides - Dynamics 365 Mixed Reality | Microsoft. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/mixed-reality/guides/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Şirin Barutçuoǧlu and Meral Azizoǧlu. 2011. Flexible assembly line design problem with fixed number of workstations. International Journal of Production Research 49, 12 (2011), 3691–3714. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.492410Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fahmi Bellalouna. 2020. Industrial Use Cases for Augmented Reality Application. 11th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2020 - ProceedingsSeptember (sep 2020), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom50765.2020.9237882Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tim Bosch, Reinier Könemann, Hans De Cock, and Gu Van Rhijn. 2017. The effects of projected versus display instructions on productivity, quality and workload in a simulated assembly task. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series Part F1285 (2017), 412–415. https://doi.org/10.1145/3056540.3076189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yuval Cohen, Hussein Naseraldin, Atanu Chaudhuri, and Francesco Pilati. 2019. Assembly systems in Industry 4.0 era: a road map to understand Assembly 4.0. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105, 9(2019), 4037–4054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04203-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Luís Fernando de Souza Cardoso, Flávia Cristina Martins Queiroz Mariano, and Ezequiel Roberto Zorzal. 2020. A survey of industrial augmented reality. Computers & Industrial Engineering 139, November 2019 (jan 2020), 106159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W Lindeman, and J. Edward Swan. 2018. A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5, April (apr 2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Johannes Egger and Tariq Masood. 2020. Augmented reality in support of intelligent manufacturing – A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering 140, February 2020 (feb 2020), 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. James Foley D., Andries vad Dam, Steven Feiner K., and John Hughes F.2004. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. https://books.google.fr/books?id=-4ngT05gmAQC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=falseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Markus Funk, Thomas Kosch, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Interactive worker assistance: Comparing the effects of in-situ projection, head-mounted displays, tablet, and paper instructions. UbiComp 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous ComputingJuly 2018 (2016), 934–939. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971706Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Florian Jasche, Sven Hofmann, and Thomas Ludwig. 2021. Comparison of diferent types of augmented reality visualizations for instructions. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gun A. Lee and Gerard J. Kim. 2009. Immersive authoring of Tangible Augmented Reality content: A user study. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 20, 2 (2009), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2008.07.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gun A Lee, Gerard J Kim, and Mark Billinghurst. 2005. Immersive authoring: What You eXperience Is What You Get (WYXIWYG). Commun. ACM 48, 7 (2005), 76–81. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1070838.1070840Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Carl Fredrik Lindberg, Sieting Tan, Jinyue Yan, and Fredrik Starfelt. 2015. Key Performance Indicators Improve Industrial Performance. Energy Procedia 75 (aug 2015), 1785–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2015.07.474Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mario Lorenz, Sebastian Knopp, and Philipp Klimant. 2018. Industrial Augmented Reality: Requirements for an Augmented Reality Maintenance Worker Support System. Adjunct Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR-Adjunct 2018(2018), 151–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00055Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Alberto Martinetti, Henrique Costa Marques, Sarbjeet Singh, and Leo van Dongen. 2019. Reflections on the Limited Pervasiveness of Augmented Reality in Industrial Sectors. Applied Sciences 9, 16 (aug 2019), 3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163382Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tariq Masood and Johannes Egger. 2019. Augmented reality in support of Industry 4.0—Implementation challenges and success factors. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 58, March(2019), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.02.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Leonel Merino, Magdalena Schwarzl, Matthias Kraus, Michael Sedlmair, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Daniel Weiskopf. 2020. Evaluating Mixed and Augmented Reality: A Systematic Literature Review (2009-2019). (oct 2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00069 arxiv:2010.05988Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Riccardo Palmarini, John Ahmet Erkoyuncu, Rajkumar Roy, and Hosein Torabmostaedi. 2018. A systematic review of augmented reality applications in maintenance. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 49, March 2017 (feb 2018), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Paul Schneider. 2018. Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field. Vol. 12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 803–848 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0283-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Keishi Tainaka. 2020. Guideline and Tool for Designing an Assembly Task Support System Using Augmented Reality. (2020), 654–665. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00077Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Industrial Use-Case : AR for Manual Assembly in Industry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Web3D '22: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on 3D Web Technology
      November 2022
      129 pages
      ISBN:9781450399142
      DOI:10.1145/3564533

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate27of71submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      WEB3D '24
      The 29th International ACM Conference on 3D Web Technology
      September 25 - 27, 2024
      Guimarães , Portugal
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format