Fiona Redmond
ABSTRACT
Higher education institutions (HEIs) internationally are increasingly recognising the importance of understanding student study choices. This is especially true in the field of computing in which skills shortages in the labour market are high but so too are student dropout rates. Loss of interest in the computing field has been reported among the reasons for students dropping out. The aim of this study is to offer a fresh perspective of the factors influencing undergraduate student’s interest and choice of specialisation in computing. Previous studies have mainly focused on five ACM-identified computing disciplines: Computer Science, Information Systems, Information Technology, Computer Engineering and Software Engineering. With the ever-growing nature of computing, two more disciplines recently emerged: Cybersecurity and Data Science. HEIs continuously endeavour to expand computing programmes into specialist areas within these disciplines such as machine learning, artificial intelligence, gaming, robotics and creative computing. For prospective students, this maze of options can make for a difficult decision. 137 first-year computing students were invited to participate in a mixed-methods survey to explore their choices around cybersecurity and other newer specialisations. The results of the survey were matched with findings from recent literature, and show that personal interest, family, media, career prospects and prior experiences still influence student choices, with media appearing to have a greater impact compared to earlier studies. HEIs can use this when developing effective recruitment strategies in computing.
- Ethel Ndidiamaka Abe and Vitallis Chikoko. 2020. Exploring the factors that influence the career decision of STEM students at a university in South Africa. International Journal of STEM Education 7 (2020), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00256-xGoogle Scholar
Cross Ref
- ACM. 2020. Computing Curricula 2020. Retrieved June 27, 2022 from https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/cc2020.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Amnah Alshahrani, Isla Ross, and Murray I. Wood. 2018. Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Understand Why Students Choose to Study Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Espoo, Finland) (ICER ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230994Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ed Anthony. 2003. Computing Education in Academia: Toward Differentiating the Disciplines. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information Technology Curriculum (Lafayette, Indiana, USA) (CITC4 ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lecia J. Barker, Charlie McDowell, and Kimberly Kalahar. 2009. Exploring Factors That Influence Computer Science Introductory Course Students to Persist in the Major. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Chattanooga, TN, USA) (SIGCSE ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/1508865.1508923Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael E Battig and Muhammad Shariq. 2011. A Validation Study of Student Differentiation Between Computing Disciplines. Information Systems Education Journal 9, 5 (2011), 105.Google Scholar
- Sylvia Beyer, Kristina Rynes, Julie Perrault, Kelly Hay, and Susan Haller. 2003. Gender Differences in Computer Science Students. SIGCSE Bull. 35, 1 (jan 2003), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611930Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maureen Biggers, Anne Brauer, and Tuba Yilmaz. 2008. Student Perceptions of Computer Science: A Retention Study Comparing Graduating Seniors with Cs Leavers. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 402–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352274Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ronan T Bree and Gerry Gallagher. 2016. Using Microsoft Excel to code and thematically analyse qualitative data: a simple, cost-effective approach.All Ireland Journal of Higher Education 8, 2 (2016).Google Scholar
- Nita Brooks, Melinda Korzaan, and Wendy Ceccucci. 2014. A preliminary comparison of student and professional motivations for choosing information systems. Information Systems Education Journal 12, 4 (2014), 49.Google Scholar
- Christine Bieri Buschor, Simone Berweger, Andrea Keck Frei, and Christa Kappler. 2014. Majoring in STEM—What Accounts for Women’s Career Decision Making? A Mixed Methods Study. The Journal of Educational Research 107, 3 (2014), 167–176.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kay Bussey and Albert Bandura. 1999. Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.Psychological review 106, 4 (1999), 676.Google Scholar
- André P. Calitz, Margaret D. M. Cullen, and Dudu Fani. 2020. The Influence of Culture on Women’s IT Career Choices. Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology 12067(2020), 345 – 357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tracy Camp. 1997. The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline. Commun. ACM 40, 10 (oct 1997), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/262793.262813Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter H. Cappelli. 2015. Skill Gaps, Skill Shortages, and Skill Mismatches: Evidence and Arguments for the United States. ILR Review 68, 2 (2015), 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793914564961 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793914564961Google ScholarCross Ref
- Justine Cassell and Henry Jenkins. 1998. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games.Google Scholar
- Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C. Plaut, Caitlin Handron, and Lauren Hudson. 2013. The Stereotypical Computer Scientist: Gendered Media Representations as a Barrier to Inclusion for Women. Sex Roles 69(2013), 58–71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J McGrath Cohoon. 2001. Toward improving female retention in the computer science major. Commun. ACM 44, 5 (2001), 108–114.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. McGrath Cohoon. 2002. Recruiting and Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing Majors. SIGCSE Bull. 34, 2 (jun 2002), 48–52.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Randy Connolly. 2020. Outside and inside Our Great City: Helping Career Advisors Understand Computing. ACM Inroads 11, 2 (may 2020), 55–60.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Randy Connolly, Janet Miller, Faith-Michael Uzoka, Barry Lunt, Marc Schroeder, Craig S. Miller, and Annabella Habinka. 2016. Red Fish Blue Fish: Reexamining Student Understanding of the Computing Disciplines. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education(SIGITE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2978192.2978232Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jill Courte and Cathy Bishop-Clark. 2009. Do Students Differentiate between Computing Disciplines?. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Chattanooga, TN, USA) (SIGCSE ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–33.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Betsy James DiSalvo and Amy Bruckman. 2009. Questioning Video Games’ Influence on CS Interest. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (Orlando, Florida) (FDG ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 272–278.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paula Doolan. 2014. The Under-Representation of Women in Third Level Computer Science Courses in Ireland. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Dublin.Google Scholar
- James P Downey, Ronnie McGaughey, and David Roach. 2009. MIS versus computer science: An empirical comparison of the influences on the students’ choice of major. Journal of Information Systems Education 20, 3 (2009), 357.Google Scholar
- Jenna Drenten, Robert L Harrison, and Nicholas J Pendarvis. 2019. Video gaming as a gendered pursuit. In Handbook of research on gender and marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788115384.00007Google Scholar
- Cedefop Eurofound. 2018. Insights into skill shortages and skill mismatch: Learning from Cedefop’s European skills and jobs survey. Cedefop Reference Series 106 (2018).Google Scholar
- Allan Fisher, Jane Margolis, and Faye Miller. 1997. Undergraduate women in computer science: experience, motivation and culture. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 29, 1 (1997), 106–110.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cecilia M Gorriz and Claudia Medina. 2000. Engaging girls with computers through software games. Commun. ACM 43, 1 (2000), 42–49.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tilo Hartmann and Christoph Klimmt. 2006. Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes. Journal of computer-mediated communication 11, 4 (2006), 910–931.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Richard G. Helps, Robert B. Jackson, and Marshall B. Romney. 2005. Student Expectations of Computing Majors. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information Technology Education (Newark, NJ, USA) (SIGITE ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 101–106.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Hewner. 2013. Undergraduate Conceptions of the Field of Computer Science. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(San Diego, San California, USA) (ICER ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493414Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Hewner and Mark Guzdial. 2011. How CS Majors Select a Specialization. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (Providence, Rhode Island, USA) (ICER ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trudy Howles. 2007. Preliminary results of a longitudinal study of computer science student trends, behaviors and preferences. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 22, 6 (2007), 18–27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Päivi Kinnunen and Lauri Malmi. 2006. Why students drop out CS1 course?. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research. 97–108.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Kordaki and Ioannis Berdousis. 2014. Course selection in computer science: Gender differences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (2014), 4770–4774.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Külli Kori, Margus Pedaste, Heilo Altin, Eno Tõnisson, and Tauno Palts. 2016. Factors that influence students’ motivation to start and to continue studying information technology in Estonia. IEEE Transactions on Education 59, 4 (2016), 255–262.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Terri Lenox, Gayle Jesse, and Charles Robert Woratschek. 2012. Factors influencing students decisions to major in a computer-related discipline. Information Systems Education Journal 10, 6 (2012), 63.Google Scholar
- M Liston, D Frawley, and Vivienne Patterson. 2016. A Study of Progression in Irish Higher Education Institutions, 2014/15 to 2015/16.A report by the Higher Education Authority. Dublin, OH: HEA (2016).Google Scholar
- Moira Maguire and Brid Delahunt. 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.All Ireland Journal of Higher Education 9, 3 (2017).Google Scholar
- Charles A Malgwi, Martha A Howe, and Priscilla A Burnaby. 2005. Influences on students’ choice of college major. Journal of education for business 80, 5 (2005), 275–282.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin N Marshall. 1999. Improving quality in general practice: qualitative case study of barriers faced by health authorities. Bmj 319, 7203 (1999), 164–167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walter Alexander Mata-López and Sergio Tobón. 2018. Analysis of factors associated to the enrollment and demand of computing-related careers. Social Sciences 8, 1 (2018), 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lavinia McLean and Mark D Griffiths. 2013. Female gamers: A thematic analysis of their gaming experience. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL) 3, 3 (2013), 54–71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc J. Natale. 2002. The effect of a male-oriented computer gaming culture on careers in the computer industry. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 32(2002), 24–31.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Engineering National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, 2018. Assessing and responding to the growth of computer science undergraduate enrollments. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Gwen Nugent, Bradley Barker, Greg Welch, Neal Grandgenett, ChaoRong Wu, and Carl Nelson. 2015. A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education 37, 7 (2015), 1067–1088.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Merilin Säde, Reelika Suviste, Piret Luik, Eno Tõnisson, and Marina Lepp. 2019. Factors That Influence Students’ Motivation and Perception of Studying Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 873–878.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donna Saulsberry. 2012. Dwindling numbers of female computer students: What are we missing?New Mexico State University.Google Scholar
- Carole L Shook. 2019. Choosing Information Systems as a Major: Factors that Influence Selection. University of Arkansas.Google Scholar
- Louise Soe and Elaine K Yakura. 2008. What’s wrong with the pipeline? Assumptions about gender and culture in IT work. Women’s Studies 37, 3 (2008), 176–201.Google Scholar
- David R Thomas. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation 27, 2 (2006), 237–246.Google Scholar
- Evrikleia Tsagala and Maria Kordaki. 2005. Essential factors that affect students’ choices to study computer science: Gender differences. Testing/Assessment (2005).Google Scholar
- Faith-Michael E Uzoka, Randy Connolly, Marc Schroeder, Namrata Khemka, and Janet Miller. 2013. Computing is not a rock band: student understanding of the computing disciplines. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education. 115–120.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard Van Eck. 2006. Using games to promote girls’ positive attitudes toward technology. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 2, 3 (2006).Google Scholar
- Roli Varma and Marcella LaFever. 2006. Motivating women to computer science education. In Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology. IGI Global, 900–906.Google Scholar
- Rebecca Vogel. 2016. Closing the cybersecurity skills gap. Salus Journal 4, 2 (2016), 32–46.Google Scholar
- Kent A Walstrom, Thomas P Schambach, Keith T Jones, and William J Crampton. 2008. Why are students not majoring in information systems?Journal of Information Systems Education 19, 1 (2008), 43.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- With a Rise in Computing Disciplines Comes a Greater Choice of Computing Degrees in Higher Education
Recommendations
Computing Education: Beyond the Classroom
Computing is the new literacy, and teaching computing in a world where computers are ubiquitous demands new techniques and contexts for learning. As these evolve, so too will the student profile.
Computing for STEM majors: enhancing non CS majors' computing skills
SIGCSE '12: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science EducationOne of the challenges facing the U.S. technological workforce is that as fewer students take computing courses, fewer college graduates are being prepared for computing careers. Besides trying to attract more CS majors, another approach is to (i) design ...
Computing and STEM in Greece: Gender representation of students and teachers during the decade 2002/2012
Female student representation in Computing and Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Tertiary education is under-researched in a number of countries including Greece, while studies on female secondary level education teacher ...
Comments