skip to main content
10.1145/3564746.3587019acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Exploring Node Classification Uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to represent and investigate interconnected data, Graph Neural Networks (GNN) offer a robust framework that deftly combines Graph theory with Machine learning. Most of the studies focus on performance but uncertainty measurement does not get enough attention. In this study, we measure the predictive uncertainty of several GNN models, to show how high performance does not ensure reliable performance. We use dropouts during the inference phase to quantify the uncertainty of these transformer models. This method, often known as Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), is an effective low-complexity approximation for calculating uncertainty. Benchmark dataset was used with five GNN models: Graph Convolutional Network (GCN), Graph Attention Network (GAT), Personalized Propagation of Neural Predictions (PPNP), PPNP's fast approximation (APPNP) and GraphSAGE in our investigation. GAT proved to be superior to all the other models in terms of accuracy and uncertainty both in node classification. Among the other models, some that fared better in accuracy fell behind when compared using classification uncertainty.

References

  1. Moloud Abdar, Farhad Pourpanah, Sadiq Hussain, Dana Rezazadegan, Li Liu, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Paul Fieguth, Xiaochun Cao, Abbas Khosravi, U. Rajendra Acharya, Vladimir Makarenkov, and Saeid Nahavandi. 2021. A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challenges. Information Fusion 76 (December 2021), 243--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Edmon Begoli, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Dimitri Kusnezov. 2019. The Need for Uncertainty Quantification in Machine-assisted Medical Decision Making. Nature (January 2019). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Chaitanya K. Joshi, Anh Tuan Luu, Thomas Laurent, Yoshua Bengio, and Xavier Bresson. 2020. Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks. (2020). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Federico Errica, Marco Podda, Davide Bacciu, and Alessio Micheli. 2019. A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classification. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yarin Gal and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2016. Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning (ICML'16). JMLR.org, New York, USA, 1050--1059.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Johannes Gasteiger, Aleksandar Bojchevski, and Stephan Günnemann. 2018. Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks Meet Personalized PageRank. (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. William L. Hamilton, Rex Ying, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Md. Farhadul Islam, Fardin Bin Rahman, Sarah Zabeen, Md. Azharul Islam, Md Sabbir Hossain, Md Humaion Kabir Mehedi, Meem Arafat Manab, and Annajiat Alim Rasel. 2022. RNN Variants vs Transformer Variants: Uncertainty in Text Classification with Monte Carlo Dropout. In 2022 25th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT). Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Md. Farhadul Islam, Sarah Zabeen, Md. Humaion Kabir Mehedi, Shadab Iqbal, and Annajiat Alim Rasel. 2022. Monte Carlo Dropout for Uncertainty Analysis and ECG Trace Image Classification. In Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition, Adam Krzyzak, Ching Y. Suen, Andrea Torsello, and Nicola Nobile (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 173--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Laurent Valentin Jospin, Hamid Laga, Farid Boussaid, Wray Buntine, and Mohammed Bennamoun. 2022. Hands-On Bayesian Neural Networks---A Tutorial for Deep Learning Users. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 17, 2 (may 2022), 29--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Andrew McCallum. 2017. Cora Dataset. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Franco Scarselli, Marco Gori, Ah Chung Tsoi, Markus Hagenbuchner, and Gabriele Monfardini. 2009. The Graph Neural Network Model. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 20, 1 (2009), 61--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15, 56 (2014), 1929--1958. http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. 2013. Intriguing Properties of Neural Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Petar Veličković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Liò, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Graph Attention Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Max Welling and Thomas N Kipf. 2016. Semi-supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In J. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2017). Toulon, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jie Zhou, Ganqu Cui, Shengding Hu, Zhengyan Zhang, Cheng Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, Lifeng Wang, Changcheng Li, and Maosong Sun. 2020. Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applications. AI Open 1 (2020), 57--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Node Classification Uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ACM SE '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Southeast Conference
          April 2023
          216 pages
          ISBN:9781450399210
          DOI:10.1145/3564746

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 June 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          ACM SE '23 Paper Acceptance Rate31of71submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate178of377submissions,47%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)70
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader