ABSTRACT
In recent years, acceptance of standards between different standard development organizations (Hereinafter referred to as SDOs) has attracted more and more attention in the standardization community. Different SDOs in international and typical foreign country level, have formed 6 different acceptance models. Based on the analysis of these acceptance models, this article studies and proposes the major features of these models, puts forward suggestions for the research on the acceptance mechanism of standards in China.
- Dianyi Bai, Yiyi Wang. 2019. Basis of standardization. Tsinghua University PressGoogle Scholar
- Ping Wang. 2019. Global Traditional Standardization ECO System —— A Standard Governance Network Extending to Every Corner of Industry, 2019(11):26-37Google Scholar
- Yiyi Wang, Xiaoyan Du, Xianghua Zhu. 2012. Analysis and Inspirations on Management and Operating Mechanism of Standardization in Typical Foreign Consortia, 2012(5):51-54Google Scholar
- Xiaoyan Du, Yiyi Wang, Hui Liu. 2013. Analysis on Regulation No. 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council onGoogle Scholar
- European Standardization. 2013(3):88-92Google Scholar
- Xiaoyan Du, Yiyi Wang, Wenhui Zhao and Xianghua Zhu. 2015. Analysis of Typical Cooperation Models between Standardizing bodies. China standardization, 2015(3):46-63Google Scholar
- ISO. https://www.iso.org/committee/55238.htmlGoogle Scholar
- ISO. 2004. Generic Framework for Developing a PSDO Cooperation Agreement (DRAFT). https://share.ansi.org/Shared%20Documents/Standards%20Activities/Background%20Papers/Supporting%20Documents/ISO_%20PSDOs_Modalities.pdf#search=PSDOGoogle Scholar
- ISO. ISO/IEEE PARTNER STANDARD DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION(PSDO) COOPERATION AGREEMENT. 2011Google Scholar
- ISO. 2021. ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated JTC 1 Supplement 2021 —Procedures specific to JTC 1Google Scholar
- CEN-CENELEC. 2013. CEN-CENELEC GUIDE 23 Consortium bridge — Adoption of third-party specifications as European Standardization PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- ANSI. 2022. ANSI Essential Requirements: Due process requirements for American National StandardsGoogle Scholar
- Japan. 2018. Industrial Standardization Act. https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=324AC0000000185Google Scholar
- The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the State Council. 2021. National Standardization Development Outline. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/10/content_5641727.htmGoogle Scholar
- The State Council of China. 2021. The 14th Five-Year Plan for Market Supervision modernization. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-01/27/content_5670717.htmGoogle Scholar
- The office of National Government Offices Administration, the Office of State Administration for Market Regulation. 2021.The 14th Five-Year Plan for the standardization of organ affairs. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-09/15/content_5637368.htmGoogle Scholar
Recommendations
ANSI's role in standards development
ANSI is the American National Standards Institute, the US national coordinating institute for voluntary standards. Typically, you will see ANSI in a standard's name followed by some letters and numbers such as X3.181-1980. These characters represent the ...
Standards Factor: GOOD NEWS FOR DRAFT SEEKERS
During the last two years, many Bulletin readers have asked me how they can obtain copies of the draft ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (International Electrotechnical Committee) standards I've mentioned in this column. I've ...
The development of ergonomic standards
This paper is an attempt to introduce a conception for the development of human factors standards. Most propositions and assertions presented here rely upon experiences made in German standardization groups.The paper provides some assertions concerning ...
Comments