skip to main content
10.1145/3564982.3564994acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicacsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterization of Graphs Based on Number of Bends in Corresponding Floor plans

Published:30 January 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Let G = (V, E) be a maximal planar graph (MPG), where every face is triangular. A floor plan (FP) of an n-vertex MPG G is a partition of a rectangle into n rectilinear polygons called modules where two modules are adjacent if and only if there is an edge between the corresponding vertices in G. It can be easily found that it is not possible to construct a FP for a given MPG while maintaining the rectangularity of the modules of a FP (for an example, consider the complete graph K4). Hence, to satisfy adjacency requirements of a MPG, bends need to be introduced within the FPs, where a bend is a concave corner of a module in a FP. A FP with rectilinear modules or with at least one bend is called orthogonal floor plan (OFP). There exist algorithms for the construction of an OFP for a given MPG but the notion of minimum bends within an OFP is not yet discussed in the literature. In this paper, a mathematical procedure for computing the minimum number of bends required in an OFP for a MPG G has been presented. Further, it has been shown that the number of bends in an OFP depends only on critical separating triangles and K4’s.

References

  1. Md Jawaherul Alam, Therese Biedl, Stefan Felsner, Michael Kaufmann, Stephen G Kobourov, and Torsten Ueckerdt. 2013. Computing cartograms with optimal complexity. Discrete & Computational Geometry 50, 3 (2013), 784–810.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ilker Baybars and Charles M Eastman. 1980. Enumerating architectural arrangements by generating their underlying graphs. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 7, 3 (1980), 289–310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jayaram Bhasker and Sartaj Sahni. 1987. A linear time algorithm to check for the existence of a rectangular dual of a planar triangulated graph. Networks 17, 3 (1987), 307–317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jayaram Bhasker and Sartaj Sahni. 1988. A linear algorithm to find a rectangular dual of a planar triangulated graph. Algorithmica 3, 2 (1988), 247–278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yi-Jun Chang and Hsu-Chun Yen. 2014. Rectilinear Duals Using Monotone Staircase Polygons. In In: Zhang Z., Wu L., Xu W., Du DZ. (eds) Combinatorial Optimization and Applications. COCOA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8881. Springer,Cham, 86–100. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12691-3_8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jonathan L Gross and Jay Yellen. 2005. Graph theory and its applications. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xin He. 1993. On finding the rectangular duals of planar triangular graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 22, 6 (1993), 1218–1226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Xin He. 1999. On floor-plan of plane graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 28, 6 (1999), 2150–2167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mohammad Reza Akbari Jokar and Ali Shoja Sangchooli. 2011. Constructing a block layout by face area. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 54, 5-8(2011), 801–809.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Krzysztof Koźmiński and Edwin Kinnen. 1985. Rectangular duals of planar graphs. Networks 15, 2 (1985), 145–157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Maciej Kurowski. 2003. Simple and efficient floor-planning. Information processing letters 86, 3 (2003), 113–119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Peter Hirsch Levin. 1964. Use of graphs to decide the optimum layout of buildings. The Architects’ Journal 7 (1964), 809–815.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chien-Chih Liao, Hsueh-I Lu, and Hsu-Chun Yen. 2003. Compact floor-planning via orderly spanning trees. Journal of Algorithms 48, 2 (2003), 441–451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I Rinsma. 1988. Rectangular and orthogonal floor plans with required room areas and tree adjacency. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 15, 1 (1988), 111–118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yachyang Sun and Majid Sarrafzadeh. 1993. Floor planning by graph dualization: L-shaped modules. Algorithmica 10, 6 (1993), 429–456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Torsten Ueckerdt. 2012. Geometric representations of graphs with low polygonal complexity. Phd thesis, Department of Mathematics at TU Berlin (2012). https://i11www.iti.kit.edu_media/members/torsten_ueckerdt/torsten_ueckerdt-phd_thesis.pdf/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kok-Hoo Yeap and Majid Sarrafzadeh. 1993. Floor-planning by graph dualization: 2-concave rectilinear modules. SIAM J. Comput. 22, 3 (1993), 500–526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Characterization of Graphs Based on Number of Bends in Corresponding Floor plans

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICACS '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Systems
        September 2022
        132 pages
        ISBN:9781450397407
        DOI:10.1145/3564982

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 January 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format