skip to main content
10.1145/3565291.3565329acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Training-Based Blind Underwater Image Quality Evaluation Metric

Published:16 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to the unique image formation principle and the limitations of imaging devices, underwater images usually suffer from low contrast, color degradation, and blurring effects, which seriously hinder the interpretation of the image content. Additionally, several underwater image enhancement and restoration (UIER) algorithms have been proposed to improve the quality of underwater images. However, their performances vary greatly under different underwater scenarios. Therefore, establishing an effective quality evaluation metric plays an irreplaceable role in assessing the underwater image quality as well as evaluating the performances of UIER algorithms. In this paper, we propose a novel training-based blind underwater image quality elevation metric. Technically, the proposed metric extracts and fuses three groups of features covering naturalness, color, and contrast. Moreover, observing that the severity of color cast is highly related to the chroma of the image, we develop an underwater color factor feature to accurately estimate the severity of color distortion. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method and its ability to evaluate the performance of UIER algorithms.

References

  1. Baoxiang Huang, Linyao Ge, Xiaoyan Chen, Ge Chen. 2021. Vertical structure-based classification of oceanic eddy using 3-d convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. 60 (Aug. 2021), 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Domenico D. Bloisi, Fabio Previtali, Andrea Pennisi, Daniele Nardi, Michele Fiorini. 2017. Enhancing automatic maritime surveillance systems with visual information. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 18, 4 (Apr. 2017), 824–833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chun Lung Philip Chen, Jin Zhou, Wei Zhao. 2012. A real-time vehicle navigation algorithm in sensor network environments. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13, 4 (Dec. 2012), 1657–1666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dorian Cazau, Julien Bonnel, Mark Baumgartner. 2018. Wind speed estimation using acoustic underwater glider in a near-shore marine environment. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57, 4 (Nov. 2018), 2097–2106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jules S. Jaffe. 1990. Computer modeling and the design of optimal underwater imaging systems. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 15, 2 (Apr. 1990), 101–111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nan Li, Guojia Hou, Yuhai Liu, Zhenkan Pan, Lu Tan. 2020 Single underwater image enhancement using integrated variational model. Digit. Signal Process. 2022, 129 (Sep. 2022), 103660.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Qi Qi, Yongchang Zhang, Fei Tian, Qingming Jonathan Wu, Kunqian Li, Xin Luan, Dalei Song. 2022. Underwater image co-enhancement with correlation feature matching and joint learning. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 32, 3 (Mar. 2022), 1133-1147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Guojia Hou, Xin Zhao, Zhenkuan Pan, Huan Yang, Lu Tan, Jingming Li. 2020. Benchmarking underwater image enhancement and restoration, and beyond. IEEE Access 8 (Jul. 2020), pp. 122078-122091.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jun Xie, Guojia Hou, Guodong Wang, Zhenkuan Pan. 2022. A variational framework for underwater image dehazing and deblurring. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 32, 6 (Jun. 2022), 3514-3526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Anish Mittal, Anush Krishna Moorthy, Alan Conrad Bovik. 2012. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 12 (Dec. 2012), 4695-4708Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Anish Mittal, Rajiv Soundararajan, Alan Conrad Bovik. 2013. Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 20, 3 (Mar. 2013), 209-212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lark Kwon Choi, Jaehee You, Alan Conrad Bovik. 2015. Referenceless prediction of perceptual fog density and perceptual image defogging. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 11 (Nov. 2015), 3888-3901.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miao Yang and Arcot Sowmya. 2015. An underwater color image quality evaluation metric. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 12 (Dec. 2015) 6062-6071.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Karen Panetta, Chen Gao, and Sos Again. 2016. Human-visual-system-inspired underwater image quality measures. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 41, 3 (Jul. 2016), 541-551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yan Wang, Na Li, Zongying Li, Zhaorui Gu, Haiyong Zheng, Bing Zheng, Mengnan Sun. 2017. An imaging-inspired no-reference underwater color image quality assessment metric. Comput. Electron. Eng. 70 (Dec. 2017), 904-913.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ning Yang, Qihang Zhong, Kun Li, Runmin Cong, Yao Zhao, Sam Kwong. A reference-free underwater image quality assessment metric in frequency domain. Signal Process. Image Commun. 94 (Mar. 2021), 116218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Daniel L Ruderman. 1994. The statistics of natural images. Netw., Comput. Neural Syst. 5, 4 (Apr. 1994), 517-548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lin Zhang, Lei Zhang, Alan Conrad Bovik. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 9 (Apr. 2015), 2579 – 2591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Krešimir Matković, László Neumann, Attila Neumann, Thomas Psik, Werner Purgathofer. 2005. Global contrast factor - a new approach to image contrast. In Proceedings of the First Eurographics conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging. (May. 2005), 159–167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Alan Conrad Bovik, Muhammad Farooq Sabir, Hamid R. Sheikh. 2006. A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15, 11(Nov. 2006), 3440-3451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yan-Tsung Peng, Pamela Cosman. 2017. Underwater image restoration based on image blurriness and light absorption. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 4 (Apr. 2017), 1579-1594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Codruta Orniana Ancuti, Cosmin Ancuti, Christophe De Vleeschouwer, Philippe Bekaert. 2018. Color balance and fusion for underwater image enhancement. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27, 1 (Jan. 2018), 379-393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Xinjie Li, Guojia Hou, Kunqian Li, Zhenkuan Pan. Enhancing underwater image via adaptive color and contrast enhancement, and denoising. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 111 (May 2022), 104759.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBDT '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data Technologies
    September 2022
    454 pages
    ISBN:9781450396875
    DOI:10.1145/3565291

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 December 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format