Sharon Ferguson
ABSTRACT
Much of the communication in organizations is now taking place on enterprise communication platforms like Slack and Microsoft Teams. These platforms enable modern teamwork, but may also exacerbate discriminatory practices. As discrimination can harm team outcomes, it is essential to study the impact that these communication methods can have. As a case study, we investigate gender discrimination in Mechanical Engineering – one of the least diverse subfields. We investigate whether traditional gendered communication patterns can be found on these platforms, as these patterns can communicate gendered differences that can lead to discrimination. Studying the Slack messages sent in mechanical design teams, we find that being a minority gender (identifying as not a man) is associated with an increase in some measures of emotional and agreeable communication, although not all, and there is no significant association with assertive communication. Future work will relate these patterns to discriminatory practices.
- R. Brisco, R. I. Whitfield, and H. Grierson. 2020. A novel systematic method to evaluate computer-supported collaborative design technologies. Research in Engineering Design 31, 1 (2020), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00323-7 Publisher: Springer London ISBN: 0016301900.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Michael J. Brzozowski, Thomas Sandholm, and Tad Hogg. 2009. Effects of Feedback and Peer Pressure on Contributions to Enterprise Social Media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531684Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catalyst. 2020. The Impact of Covid-19 on Workplace Inclusion: Survey. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Na Cheng, R. Chandramouli, and K. P. Subbalakshmi. 2011. Author gender identification from text. Digital Investigation 8, 1 (2011), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2011.04.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leah Fessler. 2017. Your company’s Slack is probably sexist. https://qz.com/work/1128150/your-companys-slack-is-probably-sexist/Google Scholar
- Leah Fessler. 2021. Workplace Harassment in the Age of Remote Work. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/08/us/workplace-harassment-remote-work.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Cary Funk and Kim Parker. 2018. Women and Men in STEM Often at Odds Over Workplace Equity. Technical Report. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/01/PS_2018.01.09_STEM_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Susan C. Herring. 2008. Gender and Power in On-line Communication. The Handbook of Language and Gender(2008), 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shiri Kremer-Davidson, Inbal Ronen, Lior Leiba, Avi Kaplan, and Maya Barnea. 2016. Raising Your Eminence inside the Enterprise Social Network. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957281Google ScholarDigital Library
- Na Li. 2012. Language Proficiency Matters in Group Chat: Supporting Cross-Cultural Communication Processes. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 291–292. https://doi.org/10.1145/2389176.2389224Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michela Menegatti and Monica Rubini. 2017. Gender Bias and Sexism in Language. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.470Google ScholarCross Ref
- A Mulac, JJ Bradac, and P Gibbons. 2006. Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis.Human Communication Research 27, 1 (2006), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00778.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- James W Pennebaker, Ryan L Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn. 2015. The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2014-3991Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F. Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W. Malone. 2010. Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science 330, 6004 (2010), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Measuring Gendered Communication Patterns on Enterprise Communication Platforms
Recommendations
Are We Equal Online?: An Investigation of Gendered Language Patterns and Message Engagement on Enterprise Communication Platforms
CSCWIt was previously hypothesized that gender differences -- and thus gender discrimination -- would disappear if communication was no longer in person, and instead was transmitted and received in the same format for all. Yet, even online, researchers have ...
Children's interactions in an asynchronous video mediated communication environment
INTERACT'11: Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part IVideo-mediated communication (VMC) has become a feasible way to connect people in remote places for work and play. Nevertheless, little research has been done with regard to children and VMC. In this paper, we explore the behavior of a group of children,...
Loneliness, parent-child communication and cyberbullying victimization among Spanish youths
Cyberbullying has been recognized as an important risk factor for mental health. Few studies have analyzed relationships between family variables and cyberbullying victimization. This ex post facto study analyze the relationships between loneliness, ...
Comments