skip to main content
10.1145/3565967.3571762acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Black Innovation: Creating and Appropriating Technology to Survive and Thrive

Published:08 January 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Taking tech to task means more than pointing out the problems and injustices. My research will seek solutions and innovative ways to create and reimagine technology that will better serve historically disenfranchised communities. In addition to learning about how technology has fallen short for those communities, I also want to learn how such communities create and appropriate technology for themselves. This requires engaging with equitable design practices. I also want to incorporate Afrofuturism as a design probe into the participatory design speculation that I aspire to facilitate in order to bring out rich responses and visceral contributions from participants.

References

  1. Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race after technology : abolitionist tools for the new Jim code / Ruha Benjamin.Polity, Medford, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Patricia Hill Collins. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Unwin Hyman, Boston. 221–238 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kimberle Crenshaw. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43, 6 (1991), 1241–1299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brianna. Dym and Casey. Fiesler. 2020. Ethical and Privacy Considerations for Research Using Online Fandom Data. Transformative works and cultures 33 (2020). https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10184948Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Virginia Eubanks. 2011. Digital Dead End: Fighting for Social Justice in the Information Age. The MIT Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhgk1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s Press, Inc., USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society 4, 1 (2018), 2056305118763366. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Shamika Goddard. 2015. Techno-Womanism: A Moral Imperative for Social Justice, Faith, and the Digital Space. Master’s thesis. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8RB73HXGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shamika Goddard and Xeturah Woodley. 2019. Techno-womanism: Foundations for Social Justice in and through the Technosphere. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019, Kevin Graziano (Ed.). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Las Vegas, NV, United States, 657–664. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/207712Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alex Hanna, Emily Denton, Andrew Smart, and Jamila Smith-Loud. 2020. Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Barcelona, Spain) (FAT* ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shamika Klassen. 2022. Black Twitter is Gold: Why This Online Community is Worthy of Study and How to Do so Respectfully. Interactions 29, 1 (jan 2022), 96–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505681Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shamika Klassen, Sara Kingsley, Kalyn McCall, Joy Weinberg, and Casey Fiesler. 2021. More than a Modern Day Green Book: Exploring the Online Community of Black Twitter. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 458 (oct 2021), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shamika Klassen, Sara Kingsley, Kalyn McCall, Joy Weinberg, and Casey Fiesler. 2022. Black Lives, Green Books, and Blue Checks: Comparing the Content of the Negro Motorist Green Book to the Content on Black Twitter. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, GROUP, Article 27 (jan 2022), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492846Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D.R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical Race Theory for HCI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cathy O’Neil. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yolanda A. Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and Nicole M. Joseph. 2020. Intersectionality in HCI: Lost in Translation. Interactions 27, 5 (Sept. 2020), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3416498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2020. The Intersection of Being Black and Being a Woman: Examining the Effect of Social Computing Relationships on Computer Science Career Choice. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 20, 2, Article 9 (Feb. 2020), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377426Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Kandrea Wade, Caitlin Lustig, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2020. How We’ve Taught Algorithms to See Identity: Constructing Race and Gender in Image Databases for Facial Analysis. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 058 (May 2020), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Miriam (ed.) Schneir. 1994. Feminism in Our Time: The Essential Writings, World War II to the Present. Vintage, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Woodrow W. Winchester. 2018. Afrofuturism, Inclusion, and the Design Imagination. Interactions 25, 2 (Feb. 2018), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3182655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Black Innovation: Creating and Appropriating Technology to Survive and Thrive

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GROUP '23: Companion Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
      January 2023
      98 pages
      ISBN:9781450399456
      DOI:10.1145/3565967

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 January 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format