skip to main content
research-article

"It's Just Like doing Meditation": Making at a Community Men's Shed

Published:29 December 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Men's sheds are community makerspaces where retired men can socialize and cooperatively organize craftwork type activities (predominantly - woodworking). The HCI and CSCW literature has increasingly shown the importance of positive health outcomes associated with makerspace-type environments. This paper aims to study how men's shed members engage in making practices and what health benefits such a hyper-masculine maker culture brings to retired older men. Informed by the occupational wellbeing framework, we report on eight-month-long ethnographic fieldwork at an Australian men's shed. Our findings show that factors such as post-retirement support, materiality afforded by the space and social factors associated with the men's shed create a positive sense of experience among retired men. We situate our findings into the CSCW literature on making and maker cultures; and provide a nuanced view on how such a maker culture can be seen a site for positive health outcomes.

References

  1. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Steven J Jackson, and Md Rashidujjaman Rifat. 2015. Learning to fix: knowledge, collaboration and mobile phone repair in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Morgan G. Ames, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Silvia Lindtner, David A. Mellis, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2014. Making cultures. In Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '14, 1087--1092. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2579405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. The Crafting of DIY Fatherhood. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 1109--1122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bell, G., Dourish, P. Back to the shed: gendered visions of technology and domesticity. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11, 373--381 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0073--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Megan L. Ballinger, Lyn A. Talbot, and Glenda K. Verrinder. 2009. More than a place to do woodwork: a case study of a community-based Men's Shed. Journal of Men's Health 6, 1: 20--27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jomh.2008.09.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Austin Toombs. 2014. Now That'S Definitely a Proper Hack: Self-Made Tools in Hackerspaces. Proceedings of the 32nd annual {ACM} conference on {Human} factors in computing systems: 473--476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kayla Carucci and Kentaro Toyama. 2019. Making well-being: Exploring the role of makerspaces in long-term care facilities. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300699Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jennifer S. Culph, Nathan J. Wilson, Reinie Cordier, and Roger J. Stancliffe. 2015. Men's Sheds and the experience of depression in older Australian men. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 62, 5: 306--315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440--1630.12190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sarah R. Davies. 2018. Characterizing Hacking. Science, Technology, & Human Values 43, 2: 171--197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917703464Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kristin N. Dew and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Designing with Waste. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS '19, 1307--1319. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Susan E. Doble and Josiane Caron Santha. 2008. Occupational Well-Being: Rethinking Occupational Therapy Outcomes. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 75, 3: 184--190. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740807500310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dave Fildes, Yona Cass, Frank Wallner, and Alan Owen. 2010. Shedding light on men: the Building Healthy Men Project. Journal of Men's Health 7, 3: 233--240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jomh.2010.08.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela Rosner. 2015. Hacking Culture, Not Devices. CSCW '15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2015. Hacking culture, not devices: Access and recognition in feminist hackerspaces. CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing: 56--68. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675223Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Barry; Foley, Annette; Brown, Mike; Golding. 2007. Shedding some new light on gender: evidence about men's informal learning preferences from Australian men's sheds in community contexts. In 37th Annual SCUTREA Conference, 3--5 July 2007, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Karen Whalley Hammell. 2015. Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 62, 2: 78--85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440- 1630.12183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Neeraj L. Hansji, Nathan J. Wilson, and Reinie Cordier. 2015. Men's Sheds: enabling environments for Australian men living with and without long-term disabilities. Health & Social Care in the Community 23, 3: 272--281. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lara Houston and Steven J. Jackson. 2016. Caring for the "next billion" mobile handsets. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development - ICTD '16: 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909609.2909658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lara Houston, Steven J. Jackson, Daniela K. Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in Repair. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16: 1403--1414. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J S Hui and E M Gerber. 2017. Developing makerspaces as sites of entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW: 2023--2038. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Steven J Jackson. 2013. Breakdown, Obsolescence and Reuse: HCI and The Art of Repair. 449--458. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Beth Kolko, Alexis Hope, Brook Sattler, Kate Maccorkle, and Behzod Sirjani. 2012. Hackademia : Building Functional Rather Than Accredited Engineers. Pdc '12: 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Amanda Lazar. 2017. Successful Leisure in Independent Living Communities: Understanding Older Adults' Motivations to Engage in Leisure Activities. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 7042--7056. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Amanda Lazar, Mark Diaz, Robin Brewer, Chelsea Kim, and Anne Marie Piper. 2017. Going Gray, Failure to Hire, and the Ick Factor. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17: 655--668. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998275Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Amanda Lazar, Jessica L. Feuston, Caroline Edasis, and Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Making as Expression: Informing Design with People with Complex Communication Needs through Art Therapy. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18: 1-- 16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173925Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Silvia Lindtner, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2016. Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16: 1390--1402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Silvia Lindtner, Anna Greenspan, and David Li. 2015. Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai Manufacturing and Maker Entrepreneurs. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21265Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Silvia Lindtner, Garnet D Hertz, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Emerging sites of HCI innovation: Hackerspaces, Hardware Startups & Incubators. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14: 439--448. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Nick Logler, Caroline Pitt, Xin Gao, Allison Marie Hishikawa, Jason Yip, and Batya Friedman. 2020. "I Feel Like This is a Bad Thing": Investigating Disassembly in Action for Novices. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376337Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as Experience. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Janis Lena Meissner, John Vines, Janice McLaughlin, Thomas Nappey, Jekaterina Maksimova, and Peter Wright. 2017. Do-It-Yourself Empowerment as Experienced by Novice Makers with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '17 1: 1053--1065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Benjamin Milbourn, Natasha Mahoney, Concettina Trimboli, Ciarain Hoey, | Reinie Cordier, Angus Buchanan, and Nathan J Wilson. 2020. "Just one of the guys" An application of the Occupational Wellbeing framework to graduates of a Men's Shed Program for young unemployed adult males with intellectual disability. Aust Occup Ther J 67: 121--130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440--1630.12630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Mohammad Rashidujjaman Rifat, Hasan Mahmud Prottoy, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2019. The breaking hand: Skills, care, and sufferings of the hands of an electronic waste worker in Bangladesh. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300253Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, Margot Brereton, Kate Vaisutis, Gary Marsden, and Frank Vetere. 2014. Never too old: Engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 3913--3922. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557184Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Daniela K. Rosner and Morgan Ames. 2014. Designing for repair? In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14, 319--331. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jaya Mai Rose Saraswati, Benjamin Tyler Milbourn, and Angus James Buchanan. 2019. Re-imagining occupational wellbeing: Development of an evidence-based framework. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 66, 2: 164--173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440--1630.12528Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. M. E. P. Seligman. 2011. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Choice Reviews Online 48, 12: 48--7217--48--7217. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48--7217Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Rita Shewbridge, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2014. Everyday making. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS '14: 815--824. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Oliver Stickel, Dominik Hornung, Konstantin Aal, Markus Rohde, and Volker Wulf. 2015. 3D Printing with Marginalized Children-An Exploration in a Palestinian Refugee Camp. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 83--102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--20499--4_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Yuling Sun, Silvia Lindtner, Xianghua Ding, Tun Lu, and Ning Gu. 2015. Reliving the Past & Making a Harmonious Society Today. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15, 44--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Joshua G. Tanenbaum, Amanda M. Williams, Audrey Desjardins, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2013. Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 2603--2612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Amanda Lazar, Alisha Pradhan, Ben Jelen, Katie A. Siek, and Alex Leitch. 2021. Studying the Formation of an Older Adult-Led Makerspace. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 593, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445146Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Nick Taylor, Ursula Hurley, and Philip Connolly. 2016. Making community: the wider role of makerspaces in public life. CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1415--1425. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858073Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yvonne Thomas, Marion Alexandra Gray, and Sue McGinty. 2017. The occupational wellbeing of people experiencing homelessness. Journal of Occupational Science 24, 2: 181--192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1301828Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Austin L. Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2015. The proper care and feeding of hackerspaces: care ethics and cultures of making. CHI '15. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 2093--2102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Dhaval Vyas. 2019. Altruism and Wellbeing as Care Work in a Craft-based Maker Culture. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, GROUP: 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Dhaval Vyas and John Vines. 2019. Making at the margins: Making in an Under-resourced e-Waste Recycling Centre. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Susann Wagenknecht and Matthias Korn. 2016. Hacking as Transgressive Infrastructuring: Mobile Phone Networks and the German Chaos Computer Club. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16: 1104--1117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Ann Allart Wilcock. 1999. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 46, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440--1630.1999.00174.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. India Anderson and Dhaval Vyas. 2022. Shedding Ageist Perceptions of Making: Creativity in Older Adult Maker Communities. In Creativity and Cognition (C&C '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 208--219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue GROUP
    GROUP
    January 2023
    414 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3578937
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 December 2022
    Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue GROUP

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader