Cited By
View all- Kaufmann CSchmiedel TChristen P(2024)Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in University TeachingIntelligent Systems Design and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-64836-6_35(360-370)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2024
Analysis of Organization and Individual Factors to Resolving the Technostress on Employees
Pages 288 - 293
Abstract
The application of information technology provides many benefits for humans, such as higher productivity and efficiency. However, it has some adverse effects. One of the negative effects of technology is technostress. Technostress is a negative psychological state associated with threats to new technology, leading to anxiety, mental exhaustion, and scepticism. Previous research has shown the role of organisation and individual factors in technostress. However, until this research was written, the relationship between organisational factors and individual factors in resolving technostress in employees is unknown. Therefore, this study will explore the relationship between these factors. This research use a qualitative method. We collected interview data by conducting semi-structured interviews. There are ten source people with the interview duration of 414 minutes. The result found are organisational factors and individual factors can resolve technostress experienced by employees. This research is expected to provide a new understanding of how technostress is managed in individuals and organisations and can limit the impact of technostress on their employees.
References
[1]
A. Ramakrishna, G. Varun, and R. Purvis, “Technostress: Technological Atecendents and Implication,” vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 9–25, 2019.
[2]
A. M. Fuglseth and Ø. Sørebø, “The effects of technostress within the context of employee use of ICT,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 40, pp. 161–170, 2014.
[3]
M. Tarafdar, Q. Tu, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and T. S. Ragu-Nathan, “The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 301–328, 2007.
[4]
D. G. Kim and C. W. Lee, “Exploring the roles of self-efficacy and technical support in the relationship between techno-stress and counter-productivity,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 8, 2021.
[5]
A. Oksanen, R. Oksa, N. Savela, E. Mantere, I. Savolainen, and M. Kaakinen, “COVID-19 crisis and digital stressors at work: A longitudinal study on the Finnish working population,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 122, p. 106853, 2021.
[6]
K. Pflügner, C. Maier, and T. Weitzel, “The direct and indirect influence of mindfulness on techno-stressors and job burnout: A quantitative study of white-collar workers,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 115, no. October 2019, p. 106566, 2021.
[7]
J. Ma, A. Ollier-Malaterre, and C. qin Lu, “The impact of techno-stressors on work–life balance: The moderation of job self-efficacy and the mediation of emotional exhaustion,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 122, no. 5, p. 106811, 2021.
[8]
T. S. Ragu-Nathan, M. Tarafdar, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and Q. Tu, “The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and validation,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 417–433, 2008.
[9]
M. Tarafdar, C. L. Cooper, and J. F. Stich, “The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 29, no. 1. pp. 6–42, 2017.
[10]
J. Saldaña, Coding Manual. 2013.
[11]
P. D. Sugiyono, “Metode penelitian bisnis: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, dan R&D,” Penerbit CV. Alf. Bandung, vol. 225, 2017.
[12]
D. Priharsari and B. Abedin, “What facilitates and constrains value co-creation in online communities: A sociomateriality perspective,” Inf. Manag., vol. 58, no. 6, p. 103433, 2021.
[13]
J. M. Morse, “Data were saturated...,” Qual. Health Res., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 587–588, 2015.
[14]
B. C. K. Choi and A. W. P. Pak, “A catalog of biases in questionnaires.,” Prev. Chronic Dis., vol. 2, no. 1, p. A13, Jan. 2005.
[15]
K. Wahl-Jorgensen, “The Affordances of Interview Research on Zoom: New Intimacies and Active Listening,” Commun. Cult. Crit., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 373–376, 2021.
[16]
D. Priharsari and R. Indah, “Coding Kualitatif Untuk Analisis Hasil Wawancara Pada Qualitative Coding To Interpret Interviews in Health,” vol. 2, pp. 1–7, 2014.
[17]
R. Kanfer, “Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectives,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 221–239, 1990.
[18]
G. W. Bock and Y. G. Kim, “Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing,” Inf. Resour. Manag. J., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 14–21, 2002.
Index Terms
- Analysis of Organization and Individual Factors to Resolving the Technostress on Employees
Recommendations
Managerial Technostress: A Qualitative Study on Causes and Consequences
SIGMIS-CPR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 Computers and People Research ConferenceTechnostress is widespread among employees in modern work life. While research has identified the causes and consequences of technostress for the general working population, insights into how managers perceive technostress, i.e. managerial technostress, ...
IT Professionals' Turnaway Intention and the Role of Technostress
The supply of global information technology (IT) workers does not meet the demand of the industry. Therefore, researchers try to distill ways to increase and retain the IT talent pipeline. Ensuring that IT professionals remain in their IT careers is an ...
Technostress Creators and Burnout: A Job Demands-Resources Perspective
SIGMIS-CPR'18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People ResearchAlthough prior research has examined the influence of technostress creators on various job outcomes, insights into the influence of individual technostress creators and their impacts on job outcomes are rather limited. In this research, by providing a ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2022
398 pages
ISBN:9781450397117
DOI:10.1145/3568231
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 January 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
SIET '22
SIET '22: 7th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology 2022
November 22 - 23, 2022
Malang, Indonesia
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 45 of 57 submissions, 79%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 69Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)25
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Kaufmann CSchmiedel TChristen P(2024)Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in University TeachingIntelligent Systems Design and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-64836-6_35(360-370)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2024
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format