skip to main content
10.1145/3568294.3580121acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Exploring the Effects of Self-Disclosed Backstory of Social Robots on Development of Trust in Human-Robot Interaction

Published:13 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigated the influence of a social robot which discloses a backstory of its experiences on the development of trust in human-robot interaction with respect to the nature of backstories. We compared three cases of backstories, a happy backstory, a sorrowful backstory and no backstory told by the robot during interaction with participants. The results indicated that the robot disclosing a happy backstory provided the participants with higher impression of trustworthiness in general and affective trust compared to the robot telling no backstory. However, the robot with sorrowful backstory was not evaluated to lead to higher trustworthiness than the robot with no backstory. Furthermore, the happy backstory condition scored higher than the sorrowful backstory condition in general, affective and cognitive trust. Thus, participants rated a happy backstory tied to positive self-disclosed emotion, to be significantly more influential in human-robot trust.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

HRI23-lbr1157.mp4

mp4

4.7 MB

References

  1. Icek Ajzen. 1977. Information Processing Approaches to Interpersonal Attraction. Theory and Practice in interpseronal attraction October: 51--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wilma A. Bainbridge, Justin Hart, Elizabeth S. Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2008. The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN, IEEE, 701--706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jenay M. Beer, Karina R. Liles, Xian Wu, and Sujan Pakal. 2017. Affective Human--Robot Interaction. In Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Inc., 359--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Deborah R. Billings, Kristin E. Schaefer, Jessie Y.C. Chen, and Peter A. Hancock. 2012. Human-robot interaction: Developing trust in robots. HRI'12 - Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: 109--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pablo Briñol, Richard E. Petty, and Jamie Barden. 2007. Happiness Versus Sadness as a Determinant of Thought Confidence in Persuasion: A Self- Validation Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93, 5: 711--727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Rik van den Brule, Ron Dotsch, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Daniel H.J. Wigboldus, and Pim Haselager. 2014. Do Robot Performance and Behavioral Style affect Human Trust?: A Multi-Method Approach. International Journal of Social Robotics 6, 4: 519--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kate Darling. 2017. ?Who's Johnny?" Anthropomorphic Framing in Human-Robot Interaction, Integration, and Policy. In P. Lin, G. Bekey, K. Abney, and R. Jenkins, eds., ROBOT ETHICS 2.0. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ed Diener, Eunkook M. Suh, Richard E. Lucas, and Heidi L. Smith. 1999. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 125, 2: 276--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Seth Duncan and Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2007. Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis. Cognition and Emotion 21, 6: 1184--1211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. F Eyssel, R Wullenkord, and V Nitsch. 2017. The Role of Self-Disclosure in Human-Robot Interaction. 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 922--927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Patrick Gebhard, Ruth Aylett, Ryuichiro Higashinaka, Kristiina Jokinen, Hiroki Tanaka, and Koichiro Yoshino. 2021. Modeling Trust and Empathy for Socially Interactive Robots. In K. Miehle, J., Minker, W., André, E., Yoshino, ed., Multimodal Agents for Ageing and Multicultural Societies. Springer Singapore, 21--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rachel Gockley, Allison Bruce, Jodi Forlizzi, et al. 2005. Designing robots for long-term social interaction. 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS: 1338--1343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Takayuki Gompei and Hiroyuki Umemuro. 2018. Factors and Development of cognitive and affective trust on social robots. Social Robotics. ICSR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham, 45--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. David Hagmann, Julia A Minson, and Catherine H Tinsley. 2020. Personal Narratives Build Trust Across Ideological Divides. OSF Preprints, 29 Sept 26, 173--180. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/sw7nz.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dorota Jasielska. 2020. The moderating role of kindness on the relation between trust and happiness. Current Psychology 39, 6: 2065--2073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Leslie K. John, Kate Barasz, and Michael I. Norton. 2016. Hiding personal information reveals the worst. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 4: 954--959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Devon Johnson and Kent Grayson. 2005. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research 58, 4: 500--507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Noel D. Johnson and Alexandra A. Mislin. 2011. Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 32, 5: 865--889.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jacqueline M. Kory-Westlund and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. Exploring the Effects of a Social Robot's Speech Entrainment and Backstory on Young Children's Emotion, Rapport, Relationship, and Learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6, July.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthias Kraus, Johannes Kraus, Martin Baumann, and Wolfgang Minker. 2018. Effects of gender stereotypes on trust and likability in spoken human-robot interaction. LREC 2018 - 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 112--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. David Lewis and Andrew Weigert. 1985. Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces 63, 4: 967--985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara, and Phillip Walker. 2018. The role of trust in. In D. Abbass, H., Scholz, J., Reid, ed., Foundations of Trusted Autonomy. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Springer, Cham, 135--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Akihiro Maehigashi. 2022. The nature of trust in communication robots: Through comparison with trusts in other people and AI systems. 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 900--903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D. J. McAllister. 1995. Affect and CognitionBased Trust As Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38, 1: 24--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Daniel J Mcallister. 1995. Affect and cognition based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38, 1: 24--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. James Ohio Pattie. 2021. Personal Narrative. Travels, Explorations and Empires: 289--303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nicole C. Krämer, Laura Hoffmann, Sabrina Sobieraj, and Sabrina C. Eimler. 2013. An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics 5, 1: 17--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kristin E. Schaefer. 2016. Measuring Trust in Human Robot Interactions: Development of the"Trust Perception Scale-HRI". In R. Mittu, D. Sofge, A. Wagner, and W.F. Lawless, eds., Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems. Springer, Boston, 191--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarah Strohkorb Sebo, Priyanka Krishnamurthi, and Bria Scassellati. 2019. ?I Don't Believe You": Investigating the Effects of Robot Trust Violation and Repair. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2019-March: 57--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Yulong Tang, Paul L. Harris, Hong Zou, and Qunxia Xu. 2019. The impact of emotional expressions on children's trust judgments. Cognition and Emotion 33, 2: 318--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jakub Z?otowski. 2015. Understanding Anthropomorphism in the Interaction Between Users and Robots. University of Canterbury.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Effects of Self-Disclosed Backstory of Social Robots on Development of Trust in Human-Robot Interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2023
      612 pages
      ISBN:9781450399708
      DOI:10.1145/3568294

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader