ABSTRACT
In this article, we consider the Hydro Unit Commitment (HUC) problem arising at the Son La hydropower plant. This problem aims to minimize the total input power used to produce a given amount of electricity and satisfy the technological constraints of the turbines. The problem is divided into two phases: 1) estimating the unit efficiency function from the hill chart provided by the turbine’s manufacturer, and 2) determining the optimal unit commitment based on that function. An Epsilon-Support Vector Regression (ϵ-SVR) model is implemented to precisely approximate the nonlinear function of the unit efficiency in the first phase. The Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulation utilizing this function with binary variables, which determines the target power used at each unit set up, is established in the second phase. The final results are compared to the usual cost incurred by the manual approach to determine the effectiveness of this model.
- [1] O. Nilsson and D. Sjelvgren, “Hydro unit start-up costs and their impact on the short term scheduling strategies of Swedish power producers,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 38-44, Feb. 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [2] V. N. Vapnik, “An overview of statistical learning theory,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 988-999, Sept. 1999.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [3] A. J. Conejo, J. M. Arroyo, J. Contreras and F. A. Villamor, “Self-scheduling of a hydro producer in a pool-based electricity market,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1265-1272, Nov. 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [4] Chapelle, O., V. N. Vapnik, V., Bousquet, O. et al. “Choosing Multiple Parameters for Support Vector Machines”. Machine Learning 46, 131–159 (2002).Google ScholarDigital Library
- [5] A. Borghetti, C. D’Ambrosio, A. Lodi and S. Martello, “An MILP Approach for Short-Term Hydro Scheduling and Unit Commitment With Head-Dependent Reservoir,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1115-1124, Aug. 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [6] Chang, Chih-Chung and Lin, Chih-Jen, “LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines,” Association for Computing Machinery, NY, USA, vol. 2, num. 3, 2011, ISSN 2157-6904.Google Scholar
- [7] Chen, P., Lu, Yz. “Extremal optimization for optimizing kernel function and its parameters in support vector regression.” J. Zhejiang Univ. - Sci. C 12, 297–306 (2011).Google ScholarCross Ref
- [8] M. Claesen, J. Simm, D. Propovic, Y. Monreau, B.D. Moor, “Easy Hyper Search Using Optunity,” Machine Learning,CoRR, v. abs/1412.1114, 2014.Google Scholar
- [9] M.M. Cordova, E.C. Finardi, F.A.C. Ribas, V.L. de Matos, M.R. Scuzziato, “Performance evaluation and energy production optimization in the real-time operation of hydropower plants,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 116, 2014, pp. 201-207, ISSN 0378-7796.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [10] X. Li, T. Li, J. Wei, G. Wang and W. W.. -G. Yeh, “Hydro Unit Commitment via Mixed Integer Linear Programming: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Project, China,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1232-1241, May 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [11] L. S. M. Guedes, P. de Mendonça Maia, A. C. Lisboa, D. A. G. Vieira and R. R. Saldanha, “A Unit Commitment Algorithm and a Compact MILP Model for Short-Term Hydro-Power Generation Scheduling,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 3381-3390, Sept. 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [12] Ali T. Hammid, Omar I. Awad, Mohd H. Sulaiman, S.S. Gunasekaran, S.A. Mostafa, N.M. Kumar, B.A. Khalaf, Y.A. AI-Jawhar and R.A. Abdulhasan, “A Review of Optimization Algorithms in Solving Hydro Generation Scheduling Problems,” Energies 2020, 13(11), 2787.Google Scholar
- [13] Brito, B.; Finardi, E.; Takigawa, F. “Mixed-integer nonseparable piecewise linear models for the hydropower production function in the Unit Commitment problem”. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2020, 182, 106234, ISSN 0378-7796.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [14] RENEWABLES 2020 GLOBAL STATUS REPORT. NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS on renewables. REN 21 2020. pp.48.Google Scholar
- [15] W. Cao, X. Liu and J. Ni, “Parameter Optimization of Support Vector Regression Using Henry Gas Solubility Optimization Algorithm,” in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 88633-88642, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [16] M. Daadaa, S. Séguin, K. Demeester, M. F. Ajos, “An optimization model to maximize energy generation in short-term hydropower unit commitment using efficiency points,” in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 125, Feb. 2021, 106419, ISSN 0142-0615.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [17] Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. IEA. Flagship report - May 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050, pp. 198.Google Scholar
- [18] K. Kumar, R.P. Saini, “A review on operation and maintenance of hydropower plants,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 49, 2022, 101704, ISSN 2213-1388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [19] A. L. Diniz, P. P. I. Esteves and C. A. Sagastizabal, “A Mathematical Model for the Efficiency Curves of Hydroelectric units,” in 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2007, pp. 1-7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [20] Finardi, Erlon C., Silva, Edson L. da and Sagastizábal, Claudia, “Solving the unit commitment problem of hydropower plants via Lagrangian Relaxation and Sequential Quadratic Programming,” Computational & Applied Mathematics [online]. 2005, v. 24, n. 3, pp. 317-342, ISSN 1807-0302.Google Scholar
- [21] L. S. M. Guedes, P. de Mendonça Maia, A. C. Lisboa, D. A. G. Vieira and R. R. Saldanha, “A Unit Commitment Algorithm and a Compact MILP Model for Short-Term Hydro-Power Generation Scheduling,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 3381-3390, Sept. 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [22] E. C. Finardi and E. L. da Silva, “Solving the hydro unit commitment problem via dual decomposition and sequential quadratic programming,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 835-844, May 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [23] F. J. Heredia and N. Nabona, “Optimum short-term hydrothermal scheduling with spinning reserve through network flows,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1642-1651, Aug. 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [24] W. T. Alley, “Hydroelectric plant capability curves,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 999-1003, May 1977.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [25] A. Arce, T. Ohishi and S. Soares, “Optimal dispatch of generating units of the Itaipu hydroelectric plant,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 154-158, Feb. 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [26]F.J. Heredia and N. Nabona, “Optimum Short-Term Hydrothermal Scheduling with Spinning Reserve Through Network Flows”, IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 10(3), August (1995).Google ScholarCross Ref
- [27] http://www.pecc1.com.vn/d4/news/Vai-tro-cua-thuy-dien-trong-he-thong-khi-Viet-Nam-phat-trien-manh-dien-mat-troi-8-1731.aspxGoogle Scholar
- [28] https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/Google Scholar
- [29] https://kernelsvm.tripod.com/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Optimizing energy generation in short-term hydro unit commitment using efficiency points
Recommendations
CO2 Emission-Constrained Short-Term Unit Commitment Problem Using Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm
The increasing concerns about greenhouse gas emissions have made it necessary to incorporate environmental constraints in the operation of power systems. The CO2 emission-constrained short-term unit commitment problem (CSCUCP) is a multiobjective ...
Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem Incorporating Renewable Energy Power
Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic ComputingAbstractIt is necessary to incorporate wind and pumped storage plants in classical unit commitment problem due to the increase in use of renewable energy sources. The cost of power generation will be reduced due to inclusion of the renewable energy ...
Unit Commitment in Electric Energy Systems
The unit commitment problem is a fundamental problem in the electricpower industry. The objective of unit commitment is to determinean optimal schedule for each generating unit so that the demand forelectricity is met at minimum cost for the system as a ...
Comments