skip to main content
10.1145/3568834.3568880acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicibeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How to Successfully Develop Functional Conflict to Enhance Marketing Channels and Co-Creation Value: Channel Conflict Management Mechanism as the Pre-variable

Published:25 January 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the market competition of marketing channel, channel conflict can sometimes positively impact and stimulate the operation of the entire channel. If channel conflict mechanism can be properly displayed among channel members, a valuable channel relationship can be established. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore the relationship of conflict mechanism, functional conflict, and co-creation value among channel members, and to construct a theoretical framework to study the relationship between marketing channels. This study focuses on smartphone retailers in the Greater Taipei area in Taiwan as research objects. The method of questionnaire survey is used to collect data, and a total of 223 valid questionnaires are obtained. This study also uses structural equations to conduct data analysis to verify of the relationship between marketing channels. The results of the study found that partner-type channel conflict mechanism does not generate co-creation value of the channel. On the contrary, self- interested channel conflict mechanism will have a negative impact on the co-creation value of the channel, but will not generate co-creation value of the channel through functional conflict. In addition, partner-type channel conflict mechanism has a significant and direct impact on improving functional conflict of retailers, and further generates channel co-creation value through functional conflict. Co-creation value of channels cannot be increased when partner-type channel conflict mechanism is adopted.

References

  1. Amason, A. C., 1996. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams, Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of management, 27(6), 643-650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(1), 25-36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bennet, G. A. and J. W. Cadogan (2001),” Partner symmetries, partner conflict and the quality of joint venture marketing strategy: An empirical investigation, ” Journal of Marketing Management, 17(1/2), 223−256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boehm, D. N., & Hogan, T. 2014. 'A jack of all trades': The role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1): 134-149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2014. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107-125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2016. Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2): 229-251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R., & Durand, R. 2011. Heterogeneous motives and the collective creation of value. Academy of Management Review, 36(4): 711-730.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cetin, Munevver Olcum and Ozge Hacifazlioglu (2004), “Conflict Management Styles: A Comparative Study of University Academics and High School Teachers,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 5 (1/2), 325–332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, K. H. and D. F. Gotcher (2010), “Conflict-coordination learning in marketing channel relationships: The distributor view, ” Industrial Marketing Management, 39 Chen, H. and T.J. Chen (2003), “Governance structures in strategic alliances: Transaction cost versus resource-based perspective, ” Journal of World Business, 38(1), 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Claycomb, C., & Frankwick, G. L. (2004). A contingency perspective of communication, conflict resolution and buyer search effort in buyer‐supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(4), 18-34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cosier, R. A. (1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(2), 295-306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dahlstrom, R. and A. Nygaard (1999), “An Empirical Investigation of Ex Post Transaction Costs in Franchised Distribution Channels, ” Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 160-170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Filley, A. C. (1970). Committee management: guidelines from social science research. California Management Review, 13(1), 13-21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gouillart, F., & Billings, D. 2013. Community-powered problem solving. Harvard Business Review, 91(4): 70-77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of marketing Research, 27(1), 24-36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Homans, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jap, S. D. (1999), “ Pie-expansion effects: Collaboration processes in buyer–seller relationships, ” Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 461-475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Madhok, A. and S. Tallman (1998), “ Resources, transaction and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relative relationships, ” Organizational Science, 9(3), 326-339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. March, J. G. , & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Menon, A., S. G. Bharadwaj and R. Howell (1996), “ The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships, ” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14(4), 299−313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Morris, M., & Carter, C. R. (2005). Relationship marketing and supplier logistics performance: an extension of the key mediating variables model. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(4), 32-43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. 1998. The concept of "Ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3): 40-54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Pinho, N., Beirão, G., Patrício, L., & Fisk, R. P. 2014. Understanding value co-creation in complex services with many actors. Journal of Service Management, 25(4): 470-493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2): 62-77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 22-40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological reports, 44(3), 1323-1344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahim, M. A., Antonioni, D., & Psenicka, C. (2001). A STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODEL OF LEADER POWER, SUBORDINATES'STYLES OF HANDLING CONFLICT, AND JOB PERFORMANCE. International journal of conflict management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Raisch, S. and Birkinshaw, J., 2008. Organizationl Mbidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators, Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rawwas, M. Y., Vitell, S. J., & Barnes, J. H. (1997). Management of conflict using individual power sources: A retailers' perspective. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 49–64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Robbins, S. P., 1978. Conflict Management and ConflictResolution are not Synonymous Terms, California Management Review, 21(2), 67-75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Rose, Gregory M. and Aviv Shoham (2004), “Inter–organizational Task and Emotional Conflict with International Channels of Distribution,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (9), 942–950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of applied psychology, 85(1), 102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Stiles, P. (2001). The impact of the board on strategy: An empirical examination. Journal of management studies, 38(5), 627-650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. 2016. Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 314-329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of organizational behavior, 265-274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International journal of intercultural relations, 22(2), 187-225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Tjosvold, D. (1985). Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of management, 11(3), 21-37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Yu, Z. (2003). Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in‐role and extra‐role performance in China. International Journal of Conflict Management.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. 2016. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4): 54-62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Vargo, S. L. and R. Lusch (2004), “ Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing, ” Journal of Marketing, 68, 1-17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an inter organizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 373-392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. How to Successfully Develop Functional Conflict to Enhance Marketing Channels and Co-Creation Value: Channel Conflict Management Mechanism as the Pre-variable

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIBE '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering
      September 2022
      552 pages
      ISBN:9781450397582
      DOI:10.1145/3568834

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 January 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format